`vp migrate`: Recognize asynchronous assertions awaited through local variables
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 58/100
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Chiarezza
- Specificata chiaramente
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- typescript
- Ambito
- devtools
Direzione di ricerca
Start with packages/cli/src/migration/vitest-v5/source.ts, which the issue identifies as the analyzer implementation. Trace how it checks whether asynchronous assertions are awaited or returned, then inspect the relevant migration analyzer tests and add a case for a promise assigned to a local const and awaited later in the same function. Done means this pattern no longer produces the review item while the existing conservative checks still behave as expected.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Description
When running vp migrate, the Vitest v5 migration analyzer reports an unawaited-assertion review item for asynchronous assertions assigned to a local variable, even when that variable is explicitly awaited later in the same test.
This can occur in tests that intentionally inspect the return type of an asynchronous assertion before awaiting it:
import { expect, expectTypeOf, it } from 'vite-plus/test';
it('checks an asynchronous matcher return type', async () => {
const assertion = expect(Promise.resolve(1)).resolves.toBe(1);
expectTypeOf(assertion).toEqualTypeOf<Promise<void>>();
await assertion;
});
The assertion is properly awaited, and the test passes under Vitest v5. However, vp migrate continues to report:
REVIEW [unawaited-assertion] Check that the result of this asynchronous assertion is awaited or returned.
I understand that the migration analyzer intentionally uses conservative static analysis and that REVIEW findings are not necessarily errors. However, this is a straightforward case where the assertion is demonstrably awaited.
Because the warning persists across subsequent migration runs, it adds unnecessary review noise for code that has already been inspected and verified.
It would be useful for the migration analyzer to recognize this pattern or provide a way to acknowledge intentionally retained code without repeatedly reporting the same finding.
Suggested solution
Extend the Vitest v5 migration analyzer to recognize simple cases where an asynchronous assertion's returned promise is assigned to a local const and subsequently awaited or returned within the same function.
For example, the following should not produce an unawaited-assertion review item:
const assertion = expect(Promise.resolve(1)).resolves.toBe(1);
expectTypeOf(assertion).toEqualTypeOf<Promise<void>>();
await assertion;
The analysis could remain intentionally conservative for more complex control flow, reassigned variables, or cases where the promise may not be awaited on every execution path.
This would preserve the existing safety checks while avoiding recurring findings for a common and easily verifiable pattern.
Alternative
An alternative would be to provide a documented mechanism for acknowledging or suppressing specific migration review findings.
For example, a narrowly scoped inline directive or configuration option could allow developers to mark an unawaited-assertion finding as reviewed without disabling the entire Vitest migration analysis.
This could also benefit other migration checks that intentionally report ambiguous cases requiring manual verification.
I would prefer improved recognition of straightforward awaited bindings, but an acknowledgment mechanism would be useful when more complex code cannot be analyzed safely.
Additional context
This was encountered while upgrading a TypeScript application using Vite+ and Vitest v5.
The original test verifies the return types of synchronous and asynchronous DOM matchers. The promise is intentionally retained in a variable so its type can be checked before awaiting it.
Relevant migration analyzer implementation:
https://github.com/voidzero-dev/vite-plus/blob/main/packages/cli/src/migration/vitest-v5/source.ts
The current analyzer appears to determine whether an asynchronous assertion is awaited or returned primarily by examining its immediate AST parent. An assertion assigned to a local variable therefore produces a review item even when the variable is awaited later.
The finding is reported as REVIEW, not BLOCK, and does not prevent migration or successful test execution.
Observed output:
$ vp migrate
VITE+ - The Unified Toolchain for the Web
▲ Vitest v5: 1 review item
src/testing/matchers.test.ts
7:21 REVIEW [unawaited-assertion] Check that the result of this asynchronous assertion is awaited or returned.
Docs: https://vitest.dev/guide/migration/#unawaited-asynchronous-assertions-fail-the-test
The warning persists when rerunning vp migrate after upgrading dependencies and verifying that the tests pass.
This request concerns the usability and precision of Vite+'s migration diagnostics, not a Vitest runtime or assertion failure.
Validations
- Read the Contributing Guidelines.
- Confirm this request is for Vite+ itself and not for Vite, Vitest, tsdown, Rolldown, or Oxc.
- Check that there isn't already an issue requesting the same feature.
- Lingua principale
- Rust
- Stelle
- 6.3k
- Fork
- 283
- Merge medio
- 1g 14h
- PR unite (30g)
- 231
Preparare l'ambiente
Avvia il container di sviluppo del progetto nel browser, con il tuo account GitHub.
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di voidzero-dev/vite-plus
-
pending triage
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
voidzero-dev/vite-plus#2882 · 2 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
enhancement
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 62/100
voidzero-dev/vite-plus#2097 · 10 commenti · 2 reazioni ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
`pnpm create vite-plus` and `yarn create vite-plus` fail with `spawn vp ENOENT` when `vp` is not on PATHForse già presa @fengmk2 l’ha presa oggi. Apertabug
voidzero-dev/vite-plus#3177 · 1 reazione · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
vp migrate doesn't flag esbuild-specific config (minify: "esbuild") — migrated project fails to build on Vite 8Forse già presa @john-okeefe l’ha presa oggi. Apertacontribution welcome
voidzero-dev/vite-plus#3176 · 1 reazione · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
`vp run`: scripts get a non-blocking stdin (EAGAIN) when `run` tasks in vite.config.ts use constantsApertapending triage
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 55/100
voidzero-dev/vite-plus#3155 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di voidzero-dev/vite-plus
Issue simili
-
llm translation
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
BerriAI/litellm#47884 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug(stubgen): `typing` / `_typeshed` imports are emitted above `from __future__ import annotations`Apertastubgen
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
bug-hunt confirmed good first issue
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
area: pcb area: rendering priority: high status: needs-triage type: bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 67/100
-
Update webpki-root-certsAperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 62/100
rustls/rustls-platform-verifier#262 · 2 commenti · 2 reazioni ·