world-postgres 4.3.x (latest): close() can resolve while a job is still running — fixed on main, not on the 4.x line
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 2/5
- Tempo stimato
- 1-3 ore
- Idoneità per principianti
- 74/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Specificata chiaramente
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- typescript
- Ambito
- backend
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia da dist/queue.js e confronta il percorso di shutdown di 4.3.x con l’implementazione corrispondente su main. Esegui la riproduzione fornita di Graphile-layer con una DATABASE_URL il cui ruolo disponga di CREATEDB, quindi verifica che lo shutdown rimanga in sospeso finché il job attivo non termina e la relativa riga non viene rimossa.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Summary
On the latest release line, PostgresWorld.close() can resolve while a step job is still running, so the application tears down its pool (and exits) underneath a job that has not yet acknowledged completion. The cause is the interaction between Graphile's own signal handlers and runner.stop().
This is already fixed on main. Both fixes are present in the published 5.0.0-beta.44 and absent from 4.3.7, which is what latest currently points at. The ask is a backport to the 4.3.x line, since 5.0 is still beta and moving the whole SDK ([email protected] → 5.0.0-beta.53) is a much larger step than the shutdown fix warrants.
The race on 4.3.7
dist/queue.js calls Graphile without noHandleSignals, so Graphile installs its own SIGTERM/SIGINT handlers:
runner = await run({
pgPool: pool,
concurrency: config.queueConcurrency || 10,
logger: graphileLogger,
pollInterval: 500,
taskList,
});
and close() does not await the pool after stopping the runner:
async close() {
closing = true;
// ...
if (runner) {
await runner.stop();
runner = null;
}
if (workerUtils) {
await workerUtils.release();
workerUtils = null;
}
// ...
}
In [email protected] (the pinned version), stop() only awaits the worker pool when it is still active:
const promises = [];
if (cron._active) {
promises.push(cron.release());
}
if (workerPool._active) {
promises.push(workerPool.gracefulShutdown());
}
await Promise.all(promises).then(release);
So on SIGTERM the ordering is:
- Graphile's own handler starts
workerPool.gracefulShutdown(), which clears_activebefore in-flight jobs finish. - The application calls
world.close()→runner.stop(). _activeis already false, sostop()awaits nothing, runsrelease()and resolves.close()continues:workerUtils.release(), pool teardown, process exit — while a job still needs a connection to persist its result.
The window is small but real, and it is exactly the case an application-managed shutdown is supposed to cover: the whole point of awaiting world.close() is that it means "jobs are done".
Reproduction
At the Graphile layer, with the same options world-postgres passes. Needs a DATABASE_URL whose role has CREATEDB; it creates and drops a disposable database. On [email protected] this prints the failure; with either upstream fix applied it prints PASS.
const { Pool } = require("pg");
const { run } = require("graphile-worker");
const verify = async () => {
const connectionString = process.env.DATABASE_URL;
if (!connectionString) throw new Error("DATABASE_URL with CREATEDB is required");
const databaseName = `gw_shutdown_check_${process.pid}_${Date.now()}`;
const admin = new Pool({ connectionString, connectionTimeoutMillis: 3000 });
const entered = Promise.withResolvers();
const release = Promise.withResolvers();
const originalKill = process.kill;
let taskPool, runner, stopping, created = false, jobFinished = false;
try {
await admin.query(`CREATE DATABASE "${databaseName}"`);
created = true;
const databaseUrl = new URL(connectionString);
databaseUrl.pathname = `/${databaseName}`;
taskPool = new Pool({ connectionString: databaseUrl.toString(), connectionTimeoutMillis: 3000 });
runner = await run({
concurrency: 1,
pgPool: taskPool,
pollInterval: 50,
taskList: {
hold: async () => {
entered.resolve();
await release.promise;
jobFinished = true;
},
},
});
await runner.addJob("hold", {});
await entered.promise;
// Deliver the signal Graphile is listening for, but keep this process alive.
process.kill = (pid, signal) => (pid === process.pid ? true : originalKill(pid, signal));
process.emit("SIGTERM", "SIGTERM");
let stopResolved = false;
stopping = runner.stop().then(() => { stopResolved = true; });
await new Promise((done) => setTimeout(done, 100));
if (stopResolved || jobFinished) {
throw new Error("Runner stopped before its active job finished");
}
release.resolve();
await stopping;
await runner.promise;
const result = await taskPool.query("SELECT count(*)::int AS count FROM graphile_worker.jobs");
if (!jobFinished || result.rows[0].count !== 0) {
throw new Error("Job completion was not acknowledged before stop resolved");
}
console.log("PASS: shutdown waited for the job and its acknowledgement");
} finally {
release.resolve();
if (runner) { await (stopping ?? runner.stop()); await runner.promise; }
await taskPool?.end();
if (created) await admin.query(`DROP DATABASE "${databaseName}"`);
await admin.end();
process.kill = originalKill;
}
};
verify().catch((error) => { console.error(error.message); process.exitCode = 1; });
Expected: the runner stays pending until the job completes and its row is gone.
Actual on 4.3.7's dependency set: Runner stopped before its active job finished.
The fix that already exists on main
5.0.0-beta.44, dist/queue.js:
runner = await run({
pgPool: pool,
concurrency: config.queueConcurrency || 50,
logger: graphileLogger,
...(config.applicationManagedShutdown === true && {
noHandleSignals: true,
}),
pollInterval: 500,
taskList,
});
const activeRunner = runner;
if (activeRunner) {
try {
await activeRunner.stop();
} catch (error) { /* "Runner is already stopped" */ }
await activeRunner.promise.catch(() => {});
runner = null;
}
Either change alone closes the race. Note that 5.0.0-beta.44 still pins [email protected], so this is a World-level fix and not something a Graphile bump would deliver.
Request
Backport one or both to 4.3.x. await runner.promise after runner.stop() is the smaller of the two and is safe regardless of who owns the signal, so it would be enough on its own.
If a backport is not planned, it would help to say so — then the answer for self-hosted 4.x users is "pin a patch until 5.0 is stable", which is what we are doing (a three-line patch adding promises.push(workerPool.promise) to Graphile's stop()), and knowing that is the intended state is useful.
Environment
@workflow/[email protected](latest),[email protected],[email protected]- Next.js 16 App Router, Bun 1.4.2 (
bun --bun next start), self-hosted on Kubernetes - Application-managed shutdown: the HTTP server owns SIGTERM and drains, then awaits
world.close()before exiting
- Lingua principale
- TypeScript
- Stelle
- 2.5k
- Fork
- 385
- Merge medio
- 1g 2h
- PR unite (30g)
- 172
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Nessuna guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di vercel/workflow
-
node-module-esbuild-plugin: getImportedIdentifier only checks the first named import when locating a violationForse già presa @FelixFangX l’ha presa 3 giorni fa. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
vercel/workflow#5057 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Feature: Expose isLastAttempt/maxAttempts in step metadataForse già presa @joelfickson l’ha presa 3 giorni fa. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
vercel/workflow#4979 · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
WorkflowServerReadableStream leaks the connection when cancelled before streams.get() resolvesForse già presa @bluepegasus123 l’ha presa 3 giorni fa. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
vercel/workflow#4644 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
world-vercel waitForTerminalStatus drops the abort signal on its fallback readForse già presa @bluepegasus123 l’ha presa 3 giorni fa. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
vercel/workflow#4643 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
world-local write() does not retry a transient Windows EPERM from its existence probeForse già presa @pranaygp l’ha presa 35 giorni fa. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
vercel/workflow#4203 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di vercel/workflow
Issue simili
-
e2e-failure ready-to-code
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 82/100
redhat-developer/rhdh-plugin-export-overlays#4616 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 66/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
ai-handle
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
nextlevelbuilder/dewee-web-v2#73 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
backend bug good first issue
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
PoCInnovation/Distribox#255 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno