hyperdb-mcp: QUALIFY unsupported (42601); APPROX_COUNT_DISTINCT no speedup on string keys — surfaced by 299M-row benchmark
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 38/100
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Tranquilla
- Ambito
- databases, performance
Direzione di ricerca
Start by reproducing the QUALIFY query and the exact versus approximate distinct queries against the benchmark table described in the issue. Determine whether the appropriate scope is QUALIFY support, dialect documentation, or optimization of constructed-string approximate aggregation. Done means the selected behavior is implemented or documented, with the reported queries and timings used to verify the result.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Summary
Follow-up from the same NYC TLC Yellow Taxi exercise as #1, this time a head-to-head benchmark of hyperdb-mcp vs DuckDB over the full normalized dataset (299,214,146 rows, 34 Parquet files, Jan + Jul × 2009–2025). hyperdb performed very well — it won 8 of 10 compute queries against DuckDB's own pre-loaded native table, by 1.25–3.9× — but the suite surfaced one dialect blocker and one perf papercut worth filing.
Environment: hyperdb-mcp (this repo), driven from Claude Code. Dialect is Salesforce Data Cloud SQL / Tableau Hyper. Data was warm in the daemon (one bench table). Timings are engine-side stats.elapsed_ms.
1. (Dialect gap) QUALIFY is not supported — 42601 syntax error
A standard "top-N per group" query using QUALIFY on a window function fails:
WITH z AS (
SELECT data_year, "PULocationID", COUNT(*) trips
FROM bench WHERE "PULocationID" IS NOT NULL
GROUP BY data_year, "PULocationID"
)
SELECT data_year, "PULocationID", trips,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY data_year ORDER BY trips DESC) rnk
FROM z
QUALIFY rnk <= 5;
-- server error (42601): ERROR: syntax error: got identifier, expected end-of-file
The documented subquery fallback works fine:
SELECT * FROM (
WITH z AS (...) SELECT ..., ROW_NUMBER() OVER (...) rnk FROM z
) s
WHERE rnk <= 5;
Impact: Minor functionally (the fallback is mechanical), but QUALIFY is a very common idiom and is supported by DuckDB, Snowflake, BigQuery, and Databricks. The MCP server instructions / dialect card advertise extensive window-function support (row_number, rank, modified_rank, IGNORE NULLS, frame modes, etc.) but do not flag QUALIFY as absent, so a user reasonably expects it to work.
Suggestion: Support QUALIFY, or explicitly note its absence (and the subquery-wrap workaround) in the dialect card alongside the window-function list.
2. (Perf) APPROX_COUNT_DISTINCT gives almost no speedup when the argument is a constructed string
Exact vs approximate distinct over a 299M-row concatenated key were essentially the same:
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT "PULocationID" || '-' || "DOLocationID") FROM bench;
-- ~2.31 s (median of 3)
SELECT APPROX_COUNT_DISTINCT("PULocationID" || '-' || "DOLocationID") FROM bench;
-- ~2.10 s (median of 3) — only ~9% faster
For comparison, on DuckDB the approximate path is dramatically cheaper than exact. Here the cost is dominated by materializing the BIGINT || '-' || BIGINT string for every row before the distinct/sketch step, so swapping exact for approximate barely moves the needle. Hashing the integer pair directly (e.g. "PULocationID" * 1000 + "DOLocationID") sidesteps it.
Impact: Low — this is a "shape your key as a number, not a string" lesson more than a bug. Filing because APPROX_COUNT_DISTINCT being ~equal to exact is a surprising result that suggests the string concat, not the cardinality estimation, dominates; worth a docs note or a look at whether string construction can be lazier under approximate aggregation.
Notes / context (not issues — positive findings)
- hyperdb beat DuckDB's pre-loaded native table on Q2/Q3/Q4/Q5/Q6/Q7/Q9/Q10 (global agg, low- and high-card GROUP BY, FILTER aggregates, PERCENTILE_CONT, window rank, EXTRACT grouping, GROUPING SETS) by 1.25–3.9×. GROUPING SETS (3.9×) and FILTER aggregates (2.6×) were the standouts.
- The only losses were Q1 (
COUNT(*), ~28 ms vs ~8 ms — trivial fixed overhead, not throughput) and Q8 exact distinct (the string-key issue above). PERCENTILE_CONT ... WITHIN GROUP,FILTER (WHERE ...),GROUPING SETS,APPROX_COUNT_DISTINCT, and all window functions worked as documented.- Build path: 34
load_filesat concurrency 8 into distinct per-file tables, then oneCREATE TABLE bench AS ... UNION ALL ...(= 61 s), was stable. (The unsafe pattern is concurrent appends to a single table — avoided here.) - Mixed-case TLC column names (
VendorID,PULocationID,DOLocationID,RatecodeID) require double-quoting (42703otherwise) — expected for a PostgreSQL-family dialect, noted for completeness.
- Lingua principale
- Rust
- Stelle
- 2
- Fork
- 2
- Merge medio
- 12h 2m
- PR unite (30g)
- 60
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di tableau/hyper-api-rust
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
tableau/hyper-api-rust#294 ·
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 35/100
tableau/hyper-api-rust#311 ·
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 45/100
tableau/hyper-api-rust#305 ·
-
Windows Named Pipe: verify DACL denies other users, and measure read-path perf for MCP workloads Aperta
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 38/100
tableau/hyper-api-rust#302 ·
-
Difficoltà 3/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 72/100
tableau/hyper-api-rust#300 ·
Tutte le issue di tableau/hyper-api-rust
Issue simili
-
Replayed reasoning items send "content": null, which the Responses API schema does not permit Apertabug CLI custom-model
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin#6930 · 1 commento ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
fulcrumgenomics/ferro-hgvs#2251 ·
-
A-allocators A-docs C-enhancement T-libs
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100