[REQUEST] UI: Make Skills a top-level sidebar resource, like Knowledge bases
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 52/100
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- react, typescript
- Ambito
- frontend
Direzione di ricerca
Start by tracing the sidebar's additionalActivePaths, the Skills page's IntegrationTabsHeader, and RESOURCE_MENU_ORDER, then follow the /skills routes and legacy ?skillId= redirect. Check the existing Knowledge bases, Tables, and Files resource flows for the corresponding entry points. Done means Skills has matching sidebar, flyout, list, Chat, search, row-action, permission, and backward-compatibility behavior without Integrations highlighting it.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Finding and managing skills can be frustrating because they’re hidden as a tab within the Integrations section. Skills are content my team writes to shape how agents behave, so they're much closer to a Knowledge base than to an external service. Because of where they sit today:
- Hard to find. New builders don't expect Skills under Integrations, and many never learn the feature exists.
- Wrong mental model. Integrations are services you connect with credentials. Putting Skills next to them suggests a Skill is a kind of connector.
- Confusing active state. On
/skills, the sidebar highlights Integrations, so it's unclear where you are. - Missing features other resources have. Tables and Files get rail flyouts and appear in the
+/@resource menus in Chat. Skills get neither.
Describe the solution you'd like
Move Skills into the workspace resources section of the sidebar and give it the same UX as Knowledge bases.
- Sidebar entry: add a Skills nav item with its own icon, after Knowledge bases:
Tables · Files · Knowledge bases · Skills · Logs. It's active on every/skills/*route, and Integrations is no longer highlighted there. - Rail flyout: in the collapsed sidebar, hovering Skills shows recent skills and a New skill action, like Tables and Files.
- Standalone page:
/skillsgets the same layout as the Knowledge bases list: header, search, New skill / Import, and a resource list. Remove the Skills tab from the Integrations header. - Chat and search: add Skills as a family in the
+attach,@mention and resource-tab menus, in sidebar order. Open a skill as a resource tab in Chat, and make individual skills searchable in ⌘K. - Row actions: give skill rows the same context menu as other resources: Open, Rename, Duplicate, Copy link, Manage members, then Delete after a separator.
- Permissions: add a
hideSkillsTabpermission-group option that works likehideKnowledgeBaseTab. - Backward compatibility: keep existing
/skillsURLs and the legacy?skillId=redirect. Send any old Integrations → Skills links to/skills.
Describe alternatives you've considered
- Keep Skills under Integrations and add a sidebar shortcut. This helps people find Skills but keeps the wrong mental model and duplicates the entry point.
- Put Skills inside Knowledge bases. They're related, but Skills are instructions and Knowledge bases are searchable documents. Merging them would blur two different jobs.
- Put Skills inside Agents. Skills are shared across agents and workflows, so tying them to one agent's settings would hide their reuse.
Additional context
- Why it matters: every resource an agent draws on (Tables, Files, Knowledge bases, Skills) should be found, opened and managed the same way. Skills are among the best ways to make agents reliable, so they should be easy to see.
- Where it lives today: the sidebar sets
additionalActivePaths: ['/workspace/{id}/skills']on the Integrations nav item, the Skills page renders underIntegrationTabsHeader, andRESOURCE_MENU_ORDERhas no skills family.
- Lingua principale
- TypeScript
- Stelle
- 29.8k
- Fork
- 3.9k
- Merge medio
- 1h 44m
- PR unite (30g)
- 841
Preparare l'ambiente
Questo progetto non fornisce container di sviluppo, Dockerfile né guida per i contributori, quindi l'ambiente è a tuo carico: parti dal suo README e consulta la nostra guida al primo contributo per i passaggi generali.
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di simstudioai/sim
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
simstudioai/sim#9831 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
v2 API rate limits self-hosted installs by IP even with billing disabledForse già presa Una pull request collegata a questa issue è aperta o già unita. Aperta
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 75/100
simstudioai/sim#8452 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Railway template generates invalid ENCRYPTION_KEY (should be 64-char hex string)Forse di nuovo libera @sahooarnav2007-gif l’ha presa 15 giorni fa e non c’è nessuna pull request aperta. Apertabug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
simstudioai/sim#6246 · 3 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
simstudioai/sim#1204 · 8 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 45/100
simstudioai/sim#9734 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di simstudioai/sim
Issue simili
-
Bug: Cloudflare Pages static _redirects identity rule causes RSC Flight to reload as HTMLForse già presa @Donvero l’ha presa oggi. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
Mantitup-Org/vista#210 ·
-
status: waiting for maintainer
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 88/100
mui/material-ui#49751 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 88/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
diplodoc-platform/transform#1184 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
JonasKruckenberg/imagetools#973 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno