smoke(simplify): first real use — one detached run of a `main` build on two notes-fixture smoke issues, after #S-01 to #S-07 merge; the owner reads the report
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 25/100
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Chiarezza
- Specificata chiaramente
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- github-actions, node.js, typescript
- Ambito
- devtools, testing-qa
Direzione di ricerca
Read the smoke templates and bin/cli.ts:374, then inspect the merged main build and the frozen skill referenced by the report. Follow the procedure to file two smoke issues on admarble/notes-fixture, launch the detached run, and collect stdout, the run log, and phase transcripts. Done when the tracker report includes the acceptance evidence and the owner answers SMOKE: ship or SMOKE: reopen #N <reason>.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Epic: graph-2026-11-simplify Tier: judgment Execution: runner Blocked by: #1646, #1647, #1648, #1649, #1650, #1651, #1652
- Blocked by: #1646
- Blocked by: #1647
- Blocked by: #1648
- Blocked by: #1649
- Blocked by: #1650
- Blocked by: #1651
- Blocked by: #1652
Problem
The phases that build each node run the published 2.20.0, not the branch, so no node's runtime behaviour has been seen by the time it merges. Unit tests show the halt, the warning and the reach block in isolation; they do not show a live qa agent leaving a needs-human Evidence line unrun while the frozen skill's §6h tells it to run every line (OQ-3), or which verdict follows (OQ-6). This node runs the merged main once. Founding doc P-12.
Procedure
- Build
mainat the commit after the last of #1646 to #1652 merges; record the SHA. - On
admarble/notes-fixture, file two smoke issues frommain's smoke templates, written at launch: A with three ACs (one ordinarynpx vitestAC; one whose Evidence isnpx tsx --env-file=.env.local scripts/smoke-check.ts→ok; one whose Evidence cannot pass, so that QA refuses), B with one ordinary AC. Neither touches fixture #34's branch. - Launch
node ~/Projects/sequant/dist/bin/cli.js run <B> <A> --chain -Q --max-iterations 3withlaunchctl submit, undersmpl-sequant/experiments/E2c/deny.sbas it stands (#856; sandbox per P-12). B goes first because--chainhalts on any failed issue (bin/cli.ts:374) and A is built to fail. - Collect the stdout, the run log and the phase transcripts; write the report as a comment on the tracker.
Acceptance Criteria
- AC-1: The run printed both experimental warnings. Evidence:
grep -cE '^⚠ (--chain is|Multi-issue runs are) experimental' ~/Projects/notes-fixture-runs/simplify-smoke/stdout.log→≥ 2 - AC-2: The run summary named A's env-file AC as needing a person. Evidence:
grep -c 'needs a person: .npx tsx --env-file' ~/Projects/notes-fixture-runs/simplify-smoke/stdout.log→1 - AC-3: No phase executed the env-file command (the prompt block quoting it is a user turn, not a tool call). Evidence:
ls ~/Projects/notes-fixture-runs/simplify-smoke/transcripts/*.jsonl > /dev/null && cat ~/Projects/notes-fixture-runs/simplify-smoke/transcripts/*.jsonl | jq -r 'select(.type=="assistant") | .message.content[]? | select(.type=="tool_use" and .name=="Bash") | .input.command' | grep -c -- '--env-file'→0 - AC-4: The run log shows A's quality loop stopping at
ac_not_met_repeated, or the report says the second refusal was not reached and why. Evidence:jq -r --argjson a "$A" '.issues[] | select(.issueNumber==$a) | .abortReason // "not-reached"' ~/Projects/notes-fixture-runs/simplify-smoke/run-log.json | cut -d: -f1→ac_not_met_repeated, ornot-reachedwith a reason in the report - AC-5: The removed flags are rejected by the build. Evidence:
for f in --model-ladder=sonnet --escalate-effort --stacked --reflect --full-qa; do node ~/Projects/sequant/dist/bin/cli.js run 1 $f --dry-run 2>&1 | grep -c "unknown option"; done | sort -u | tr '\n' ' '→1 - AC-6: The owner answered the smoke question on the tracker. Evidence:
gh issue view $(gh issue list --label graph-2026-11-simplify --search 'tracker' --state all --json number --jq '.[0].number') --json comments --jq '[.comments[].body|select(test("^SMOKE: (ship|reopen)"))]|length'→≥ 1
The question (owner): given the report, is main fit to release as 3.0, or which node reopens? Answer SMOKE: ship or SMOKE: reopen #N <reason>.
isGateTestEvidence classifies AC-1 to AC-4 as gates (parse-check, 2026-11-04). This node changes nothing in sequant's tree and runs no /qa phase (Execution: runner), so §6i never reads them and no SEQUANT_MUTATION record applies; the report pastes each command's output.
OQ-6 (the verdict A gets with one AC pending) is recorded in the report; a verdict the frozen skill gets wrong is a post-lift fix, not a reopen.
May touch
Nothing in sequant's tree. admarble/notes-fixture: two issues, their branches and PRs, closed after the report. ~/Projects/notes-fixture-runs/simplify-smoke/ (local).
Non-Goals
- Any scored measurement; this is a smoke.
- Fixture #34 or any fixture with ground truth.
Done when
The owner has read one real run of the simplified main and answered ship or reopen.
- Lingua principale
- TypeScript
- Stelle
- 1
- Fork
- 1
- Merge medio
- 11h 3m
- PR unite (30g)
- 84
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di sequant-io/sequant
-
graph-2026-11-simplify
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
sequant-io/sequant#1650 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
run: --phases does not suppress the UI-label test phase (determinePhasesForIssue adds it to an explicit list)Forse già presa @admarble l’ha presa oggi. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
sequant-io/sequant#1631 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
sequant-io/sequant#1601 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 86/100
sequant-io/sequant#1582 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 76/100
sequant-io/sequant#1381 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di sequant-io/sequant
Issue simili
-
content triage
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
tensorflow/tfjs#8754 ·
-
tool-submission
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 83/100
BraveOPotato/NoSignups#2348 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent#12784 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
external-issue to-triage
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 71/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno