`k2nix` proposal
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Idoneità per principianti
- 20/100
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Chiarezza
- Da chiarire
- Stato di attività
- Ferma
- Stack tecnologico
- cpp
- Ambito
- build-system, developer-experience
Direzione di ricerca
Start by reviewing issue #47 and the proposed kbuild design, including the .kbuild example and boilerplate Nix flake using dream2nix. Determine how kbuild should translate project and dependency declarations into a flake and how kbuild shell . should invoke the resulting development environment. Done means the design is specified well enough to implement and provides the listed K, plugin, solc, and secp256k1 dependencies.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Having investigated #47, it turns out that the nix provided clang/c++ binaries are specially wrapped to ignore system wide paths as suspected. This wiki gives a bit more detail https://nixos.wiki/wiki/C, see also https://nixos.wiki/wiki/FAQ/I_installed_a_library_but_my_compiler_is_not_finding_it._Why%3F. THe way nix does this is to wrap the binaries in a script which reads any additional includes from NIX_CFLAGS_COMPILE/NIX_LDFLAGS. When a nix derivation is added to the buildInputs, nix automagically adds the relevant includes/ from those derivation to these vars inside it's build environment. The same thing happens when we call nix develop inside the project (e.g. evm-semantics), i.e. nix provides a shell with the same set of evn vars set correctly for clang to find the necessary libraries.
Given that C/C++ has no package manager, I think this is a sensible decision, but it does pose a question of how to provide an environment for developing with K, which implicitly relies on clang for the llvm-backend. One option would be to just patch nix provided clang to either look at the system path or alternatively provide versions of clang with the relevant libraries included in its search path, as discussed previously. However, both approaches go somewhat counter to nix philosophy and more importantly, given the discussions around kbuild, I believe it would make more sense to instead design a kbuild YAML/TOML format which nix can consume to supply the extra dependencies various projects require. This way, users wouldn't have to drop into the full nix language for basic/pre-packaged scenarios. Using nix in conjunction with kbuild, we could leverage nix to not only build executables but also provide us with a deterministic developer shell, which is largely consistent across the various distros, thus not relying on any system wide tools.
Roughly speaking we could have a .kbuild file:
[project]
k = ">=5.3.0"
title = "evm-semantics"
version = "0.1.0"
[dependencies.k]
repo = "https://github.com/runtimeverification/k"
rev = "..."
[dependencies.blockchain-k-plugin]
repo = "https://github.com/runtimeverification/blockchain-k-plugin"
rev = "..."
[dependencies.secp256k1]
type = "nix"
[dependencies.runtime.solc]
type = "nix"
...
and a boilerplate nix flake
{
inputs = {
dream2nix.url = "github:nix-community/dream2nix";
};
outputs = {
self,
dream2nix,
} @ inp:
(dream2nix.lib.makeFlakeOutputs {
systems = ["x86_64-linux"];
config.projectRoot = ./.;
source = ./.;
projects = ./projects.toml;
});
}
where the .kbuild file would actually get translated by dream2nix into a flake via makeFlakeOutputs.
Then, calling something like kbuild shell . would simply call nix develop ., providing us with a shell with k, blockchain plugin, solc, secp256k1, etc.
- Lingua principale
- Python
- Stelle
- 10
- Fork
- 2
- Metriche di merge delle PR
- Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g
Preparare l'ambiente
Non abbiamo ancora controllato i file di configurazione di questo progetto. Parti dal suo README e consulta la nostra guida al primo contributo per i passaggi generali.
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di runtimeverification/kup
-
Difficoltà 3/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 52/100
runtimeverification/kup#149 ·
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 35/100
runtimeverification/kup#138 ·
-
Update `kup list` to show nicer and shorter version strings againForse di nuovo libera @juliankuners l’ha presa 426 giorni fa e non c’è nessuna pull request aperta. Aperta
runtimeverification/kup#137 · 1 commento · 1 assegnatario ·
-
Add more Nix versions to test CI workflowForse di nuovo libera @juliankuners l’ha presa 426 giorni fa e non c’è nessuna pull request aperta. Aperta
runtimeverification/kup#136 · 1 assegnatario ·
-
Kup fails to uninstall nix profile packages by index on new nix and nix manifest versionsForse di nuovo libera @juliankuners l’ha presa 426 giorni fa e non c’è nessuna pull request aperta. Aperta
runtimeverification/kup#135 · 1 assegnatario ·
Tutte le issue di runtimeverification/kup
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 72/100
letsencrypt/cp-cps#353 ·
-
Marble Madness II is missingAperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 84/100
PedestrianDynamics/pyFDS-Evac#394 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
DOI-USGS/pywatershed#421 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
python-pillow/Pillow#10087 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno