Cache operators drop OnCompleted and mishandle OnError
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 48/100
Direzione di ricerca
Start with the listed operator overloads grouped by implementation, especially BatchIf/BufferIf, Bind, Combine, Grouping, joins, MergeChangeSets, and the error-path cases. Reproduce the terminal-event behavior using the issue’s harness approach: test empty completion and error, then a changeset followed by each terminal event. Done means the affected overloads complete and propagate errors correctly, with tests that cover the cases described.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
While fixing Switch (#1136, #1137) I wanted to know whether that was a one off or the tip of something, so I wrote a harness that drives every operator overload with a source that either completes or errors, and records what actually comes out the other end.
It reached 476 of the 499 extension methods that hang off IObservable. The rest do not return an observable (AsObservableCache, the Bind overloads returning IDisposable, ChangeSetAggregator and so on) so there is nothing to assert about.
Two things are worth saying before the list.
Overloads of the same operator do not behave alike. Sort is the clearest case:
source.Sort(comparer) // completes
source.Sort(Observable.Return(comparer)) // never completes
source.Sort(comparer, resorter) // never completes
Testing one overload and assuming the rest are fine would have missed most of this, so every overload was driven separately.
"Never completes" means with an empty source. An operator that merges a stream per item is entitled to stay open while those streams are open, so I checked completion against a source that never produced an item. Nothing can legitimately block completion in that case. AutoRefresh, WhenAnyPropertyChanged and GroupOnPropertyWithImmutableState all complete on an empty source and are not listed here.
On the cache side 42 overloads either never complete or get the error path wrong. Grouped by the implementation they share, since several of these are one bug wearing different names.
Repro
var source = new SourceCache<Person, string>(p => p.Name);
var completed = false;
using var sub = source.Connect()
.Or(Observable.Empty<IChangeSet<Person, string>>())
.Subscribe(_ => { }, () => completed = true);
source.Dispose();
// completed is false
Never completes
BatchIf / BufferIf
BatchIf(IObservable<bool>, bool, IObservable<Unit>, IScheduler)
BatchIf(IObservable<bool>, bool, IScheduler)
BatchIf(IObservable<bool>, bool, TimeSpan?, IScheduler)
BatchIf(IObservable<bool>, IScheduler)
BatchIf(IObservable<bool>, TimeSpan?, IScheduler)
Bind (SortAndPage / SortAndVirtualize output)
Bind(IList<TObject>)
Bind(out ReadOnlyObservableCollection<TObject>)
Combiner (Combine)
And(params IObservable<IChangeSet<TObject, TKey>>[])
Except(params IObservable<IChangeSet<TObject, TKey>>[])
Or(params IObservable<IChangeSet<TObject, TKey>>[])
Xor(params IObservable<IChangeSet<TObject, TKey>>[])
DeferUntilLoaded
DeferUntilLoaded()
SkipInitial()
Grouping
Group(Func<TObject,TKey>, IObservable<IDistinctChangeSet<TKey>>)
Join family
FullJoinMany(IObservable<IChangeSet<TObject,TKey>>, Func<TObject,TKey>, Func<Optional<TObject>,IGrouping<TObject,TKey,TKey>,TObject>)
FullJoinMany(IObservable<IChangeSet<TObject,TKey>>, Func<TObject,TKey>, Func<TKey,Optional<TObject>,IGrouping<TObject,TKey,TKey>,TObject>)
InnerJoinMany(IObservable<IChangeSet<TObject,TKey>>, Func<TObject,TKey>, Func<TKey,TObject,IGrouping<TObject,TKey,TKey>,TObject>)
InnerJoinMany(IObservable<IChangeSet<TObject,TKey>>, Func<TObject,TKey>, Func<TObject,IGrouping<TObject,TKey,TKey>,TObject>)
LeftJoinMany(IObservable<IChangeSet<TObject,TKey>>, Func<TObject,TKey>, Func<TKey,TObject,IGrouping<TObject,TKey,TKey>,TObject>)
LeftJoinMany(IObservable<IChangeSet<TObject,TKey>>, Func<TObject,TKey>, Func<TObject,IGrouping<TObject,TKey,TKey>,TObject>)
RightJoinMany(IObservable<IChangeSet<TObject,TKey>>, Func<TObject,TKey>, Func<Optional<TObject>,IGrouping<TObject,TKey,TKey>,TObject>)
RightJoinMany(IObservable<IChangeSet<TObject,TKey>>, Func<TObject,TKey>, Func<TKey,Optional<TObject>,IGrouping<TObject,TKey,TKey>,TObject>)
MergeChangeSets
MergeChangeSets(IEnumerable<IObservable<IChangeSet<TObject,TKey>>>, IComparer<TObject>, IScheduler, bool)
MergeChangeSets(IEnumerable<IObservable<IChangeSet<TObject,TKey>>>, IEqualityComparer<TObject>, IComparer<TObject>, IScheduler, bool)
MergeChangeSets(IEnumerable<IObservable<IChangeSet<TObject,TKey>>>, IEqualityComparer<TObject>, IScheduler, bool)
MergeChangeSets(IEnumerable<IObservable<IChangeSet<TObject,TKey>>>, IScheduler, bool)
MergeChangeSets(IObservable<IChangeSet<TObject,TKey>>, IComparer<TObject>, IScheduler, bool)
MergeChangeSets(IObservable<IChangeSet<TObject,TKey>>, IEqualityComparer<TObject>, IComparer<TObject>, IScheduler, bool)
MergeChangeSets(IObservable<IChangeSet<TObject,TKey>>, IEqualityComparer<TObject>, IScheduler, bool)
MergeChangeSets(IObservable<IChangeSet<TObject,TKey>>, IScheduler, bool)
MonitorStatus
MonitorStatus()
Sort (dynamic overloads only)
Sort(IComparer<TObject>, IObservable<Unit>, SortOptimisations, int)
Sort(IObservable<IComparer<TObject>>, SortOptimisations, int)
Switch (already covered by #1137 / #1139)
Switch()
Error path
Bind (SortAndPage / SortAndVirtualize output)
Bind(IList<TObject>, SortAndBindOptions)
Bind(out ReadOnlyObservableCollection<TObject>, SortAndBindOptions)
Grouping
Group(Func<TObject,TKey>)
Group(Func<TObject,TKey>, IObservable<Unit>)
MergeManyItems
MergeManyItems(Func<TObject,IObservable<TObject>>)
MergeManyItems(Func<TObject,TKey,IObservable<TObject>>)
TreeBuilder
SelectTree(Func<TObject,TKey>)
TransformToTree(Func<TObject,TKey>, IObservable<Func<Node<TObject,TKey>,bool>>)
Why this matters
Anything that waits for a terminal event breaks against these: TakeUntil, Concat, LastAsync, ToTask, Amb. The completion pattern in the repo's own testing guidance (Publish, then LastOrDefaultAsync().ToTask(), then dispose the source) hangs forever rather than failing, so tests written that way around these operators are not asserting what they look like they assert.
The error cases are worse than the completion ones. Where an operator throws out of Subscribe instead of calling OnError, the exception surfaces on whichever thread happened to be writing to the source, which is usually nowhere near the subscription. Where the error is swallowed entirely the subscriber simply never learns the stream is dead.
Method
Each overload was subscribed and then given, in turn: OnCompleted with no items, OnError with no items, one changeset followed by OnCompleted, one changeset followed by OnError, and a dispose followed by more writes. Terminal events were delivered both during subscription and afterwards, since several of these only misbehave when the terminal event arrives synchronously, which is what Switch did.
- Lingua principale
- C#
- Stelle
- 1.9k
- Fork
- 194
- Merge medio
- 12m
- PR unite (30g)
- 1
Preparare l'ambiente
Questo progetto non fornisce container di sviluppo, Dockerfile né guida per i contributori, quindi l'ambiente è a tuo carico: parti dal suo README e consulta la nostra guida al primo contributo per i passaggi generali.
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di reactivemarbles/DynamicData
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
reactivemarbles/DynamicData#1229 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
infrastructure
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 64/100
reactivemarbles/DynamicData#1089 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[Bug]: ChangeAwareList merges an insert one slot before a pending AddRange, corrupting list order downstreamForse già presa @dwcullop l’ha presa 9 giorni fa. Apertabug
Difficoltà 3/5 Mezza giornata Idoneità per principianti 63/100
reactivemarbles/DynamicData#1225 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[Feature]: Make Avg, StdDev, Maximum and Minimum refresh-aware, consistent with SumForse già presa @dwcullop l’ha presa 14 giorni fa. Apertabreaking change enhancement
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 20/100
reactivemarbles/DynamicData#1214 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 35/100
reactivemarbles/DynamicData#1196 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di reactivemarbles/DynamicData
Issue simili
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
immichFrame/ImmichFrame#735 ·
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
dimitar-radenkov/Pointframe#318 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
DotHarness/dotcraft#546 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
a-corriger bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
christian-raj/S-Aloha#303 · 1 commento ·
-
Input editor says "Apply Changes" even when no changes have been made.Forse già presa @hcooper l’ha presa oggi. Aperta
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 72/100
MobiFlight/MobiFlight-Connector#3526 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno