TextLLMRunner degenerates on an LFM2.5 export that steps correctly token by token
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
@JakeStevens ci sta già lavorando.
Dal 15/8/2026.
Valutazione
Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.
Descrizione
TextLLMRunner produces degenerate output for an LFM2.5 export that generates correctly when the same .pte is stepped token by token. Reproduces on macOS with the pip wheel and on Android through LlmModule, and does not depend on the export configuration.
Environment: executorch 1.4.0 (pip), torch 2.13.0, macOS arm64; also reproduced on a Pixel 8a with an AAR built from main.
What happens
Same .pte, same prompt, same machine, two ways of driving it:
token-by-token, explicit input_pos "Here are three colors:\n\n1. **Red**\n2. **Green**"
TextLLMRunner "s::::<|im_end|>"
Shorter prompts make the shape clearer — the runner repeats one token:
prompt "Hi" -> "HiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHi"
prompt "Name three colours." -> "<|im_end|><|im_end|>"
Repro
from executorch.extension.llm.custom_ops import custom_ops # noqa
from executorch.kernels import quantized # noqa
from executorch.extension.llm.runner import TextLLMRunner, GenerationConfig
r = TextLLMRunner("lfm2_5_350m_xnnpack_8da4w.pte", "tokenizer.json")
out = []
r.generate("Hi", GenerationConfig(max_new_tokens=16, echo=False), lambda t: out.append(t))
print("".join(out)) # HiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHiHi
The same file through a loop that steps one token at a time answers normally:
import torch
from executorch.extension.pybindings.portable_lib import _load_for_executorch
model = _load_for_executorch("lfm2_5_350m_xnnpack_8da4w.pte")
for i, tok in enumerate(prompt_tokens):
logits = model.forward((torch.tensor([[tok]]), torch.tensor([i])))[0]
# then greedy-decode from logits, advancing input_pos each step
The .pte is public: https://huggingface.co/mlboydaisuke/LFM2.5-350M-ExecuTorch — exported with
executorch.extension.llm.export.export_llm, qmode: 8da4w, embedding_quantize: "8,0",
XNNPACK.
What it is not
I re-exported the model to remove each candidate in turn and drove every build both ways:
| build | forward input |
enable_dynamic_shape |
token-by-token | TextLLMRunner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
shipped (use_sdpa_with_kv_cache: True) |
[1, 2047] |
True | correct | degenerate |
control (use_sdpa_with_kv_cache: False, enable_dynamic_shape: False) |
[1, 1] |
False | correct | degenerate |
So it is not the custom SDPA path, and not dynamic versus static shape — a static [1, 1] export,
which the runner should drive sequentially, fails the same way.
It is not the tokenizer either: the same tokenizer.json encodes the prompt to the expected ids
through a standalone HFTokenizer harness on the same machine, special tokens included, and the
.pte reports get_bos_id = 1, get_eos_ids = [7], matching the tokenizer.
And it is not the runner in general — Qwen3.5-0.8B exported the same way (8da4w,
embedding_quantize: "8,0", XNNPACK) generates correctly through TextLLMRunner on the same
build, so whatever this is interacts with something specific to LFM2.5.
A guess I could not confirm
LFM2.5 is a hybrid: short-convolution blocks interleaved with attention. Convolution blocks carry
state along the sequence, so anything that drives positions differently from a plain
one-token-at-a-time walk — a warmup pass, a re-prefill, a batched first step — would corrupt that
state while leaving a pure-attention model like Qwen unharmed. I could not confirm which of those
the runner does, so I am reporting the isolation rather than a diagnosis.
Happy to run further experiments against this model, or to test a patch.
This report was written with Claude.
cc @larryliu0820 @mergennachin @cccclai @helunwencser @jackzhxng @digantdesai
- Lingua principale
- Python
- Stelle
- 5k
- Fork
- 1.2k
- Merge medio
- 2g 5h
- PR unite (30g)
- 491
Preparare l'ambiente
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di pytorch/executorch
-
enhancement triaged
Difficoltà 2/5 Mezza giornata Idoneità per principianti 68/100
pytorch/executorch#21640 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[RFC] ExecuTorch Persisting Device Specialized Delegate ArtifactsForse già presa @JacobSzwejbka l’ha presa oggi. Aperta
pytorch/executorch#23192 · 1 commento · 1 reazione · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[QNN] Enable ConvTranspose + BatchNorm fusion after #23170Forse già presa @psiddh l’ha presa oggi. Apertamodule: qnn partner: qualcomm
pytorch/executorch#23185 · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
enhancement module: examples
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 20/100
pytorch/executorch#23164 · 7 commenti · 2 reazioni ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Qualcomm: 8-bit per-channel weight scales are floored at the 16-bit eps, and the HTP miscomputes near-zero channelsForse già presa @psiddh l’ha presa 3 giorni fa. Apertamodule: qnn module: quantization partner: qualcomm
pytorch/executorch#23160 · 1 commento · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di pytorch/executorch
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 86/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 70/100
-
FingerprintSplitter raises ZeroDivisionError when int(frac_train * len(dataset)) floors to zeroAperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 88/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 7 giorni
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
lmstudio-ai/mlx-engine#376 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
pyiron/bagofholding#166 ·