Hacktoberfest 2026: le issue che i maintainer hanno segnato per ottobre, aperte e adatte ai principianti. Sfoglia le issue Hacktoberfest

asyncio: DPY-4011 on connect_async() when the listener closes the original socket after a redirect

Aperta
#616 0 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

@AlexGracas ci sta già lavorando.

Dal 6/10/2026.

  • #617 di @AlexGracas — aperta

Valutazione

Difficoltà
3/5
Tempo stimato
1-2 giorni
Idoneità per principianti
35/100
Tipo di issue
Bug
Chiarezza
Specificata chiaramente
Stato di attività
Ferma
Stack tecnologico
python
Ambito
backend, databases

Direzione di ricerca

Start with BaseAsyncProtocol._connect_tcp() and BaseAsyncProtocol.connection_lost() in the asyncio protocol implementation; the report identifies the unguarded waiter handling when the old redirected transport closes. Run the supplied fake-listener reproducer, which needs no database, and verify that the redirected connection waits until the 3-second timeout rather than failing early with DPY-4011. Pull request #617 is already open with a proposed fix.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

  1. What versions are you using?
  • Oracle Database 19.28.0.0.0 (RAC, the listener redirects every connection to another address)
  • python-oracledb 26.0.1 (Thin mode). Also reproduced with a build of main.
  • platform.platform: Linux-6.18.40.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2-x86_64-with-glibc2.39
  • sys.maxsize > 2**32: True
  • platform.python_version: 3.14.3 (same result with 3.13.2)
  1. Is it an error or a hang or a crash?

An error.

  1. What error(s) or behavior you are seeing?

oracledb.connect_async() and oracledb.create_pool_async() always fail with

oracledb.exceptions.DatabaseError: DPY-4011: the database or network closed the connection

about 0.3 seconds after the connect starts. oracledb.connect() with the same parameters works, with or without disable_oob=True and with either server_type.

With PYO_DEBUG_PACKETS the sync and async traces are the same up to the second authorization request. The async trace ends there:

Sending request authorization [op 17] on socket 7
Disconnecting transport [op 18] on socket 7

Wrapping the protocol passed to loop.create_connection() shows that the socket that gets closed is not the one in use (addresses replaced):

[0.050s] fd 6 connected to LISTENER:1521
[0.092s] fd 6 received 378 bytes        <- redirect
[0.134s] fd 7 connected to NODE:1521
[0.176s] fd 7 received 8 bytes
[0.217s] fd 7 received 45 bytes         <- accept
[0.259s] fd 7 received 191 bytes
[0.302s] fd 7 received 2717 bytes
[0.344s] fd 7 received 371 bytes        <- auth phase one response
[0.376s] fd 6 EOF received from LISTENER:1521
[0.376s] fd 6 connection_lost exc=None
[0.376s] DPY-4011: the database or network closed the connection
[0.376s] fd 7 connection_lost exc=None  <- closed by the driver after the error

Cause

After a redirect the driver opens a second transport using the same protocol object (lambda: self in BaseAsyncProtocol._connect_tcp()), and the transport to the listener is left open. In this environment the listener closes its side roughly 0.3 seconds later, while the driver is waiting for a packet on the new transport. BaseAsyncProtocol.connection_lost() is then called for the old transport:

def connection_lost(self, exc):
    if not self._in_connect:
        ...
    if self._read_buf._waiter is not None \
            and not self._read_buf._waiter.done():
        error = errors._create_err(errors.ERR_CONNECTION_CLOSED)
        self._read_buf._waiter.set_exception(error.exc_type(error))

The first block is skipped because _in_connect is set, as the docstring intends ("losing the connection is ignored since this can happen normally when a listener redirect is encountered"). The second block is not guarded, so the pending wait on the healthy transport is failed with DPY-4011. When the listener closes its socket before the driver starts waiting on the new transport there is no pending waiter, which is presumably why this is not seen everywhere.

The unguarded block is already present in 3.4.2 and 4.0.0, so this is not new in 26.x.

  1. Does your application call init_oracle_client()?

No. Thin mode.

  1. Include a runnable Python script that shows the problem.

No database is needed. A fake listener answers the CONNECT packet with a REDIRECT and closes its socket 0.3 seconds later; the redirected server accepts the TCP connection and stays silent. The driver should keep waiting on the redirected connection until the 3 second timeout.

"""
Reproduces DPY-4011 with asyncio and a listener redirect, without a database.

A fake listener answers the CONNECT packet with a REDIRECT to a second server
and closes its own socket only 0.3 seconds later. The second server accepts the
TCP connection and stays silent, so the driver should keep waiting on it until
the 3 second timeout below expires.
"""
import asyncio
import struct
import time

import oracledb

LISTENER_CLOSE_DELAY = 0.3


async def main():
    async def redirected_server(reader, writer):
        await reader.read()  # never answers; waits for the client to give up
        writer.close()

    target = await asyncio.start_server(redirected_server, "127.0.0.1", 0)
    target_port = target.sockets[0].getsockname()[1]

    async def listener(reader, writer):
        await reader.read(8192)  # CONNECT packet
        data = (
            f"(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=127.0.0.1)(PORT={target_port}))"
            "\x00(DESCRIPTION=(CONNECT_DATA=(SERVICE_NAME=svc)))"
        ).encode()
        # REDIRECT packet (type 5) followed by a DATA packet (type 6) with
        # the redirect data, as sent by an Oracle Database 19c listener
        writer.write(struct.pack(">HHBBHH", 10, 0, 5, 0, 0, len(data)))
        writer.write(
            struct.pack(">HHBBHH", 10 + len(data), 0, 6, 0, 0, 0) + data
        )
        await writer.drain()
        await asyncio.sleep(LISTENER_CLOSE_DELAY)
        writer.close()  # the listener closes its side late

    server = await asyncio.start_server(listener, "127.0.0.1", 0)
    listener_port = server.sockets[0].getsockname()[1]

    start = time.monotonic()
    try:
        await asyncio.wait_for(
            oracledb.connect_async(
                user="u",
                password="p",
                dsn=f"127.0.0.1:{listener_port}/svc",
                retry_count=0,
            ),
            3,
        )
    except asyncio.TimeoutError:
        print(
            f"{oracledb.__version__}: OK - still waiting on the redirected "
            f"connection after {time.monotonic() - start:.1f}s"
        )
    except oracledb.Error as e:
        print(
            f"{oracledb.__version__}: BUG - failed after "
            f"{time.monotonic() - start:.1f}s: {e.__cause__ or e}"
        )
    server.close()
    target.close()


asyncio.run(main())

Output with 26.0.1:

26.0.1: BUG - failed after 0.3s: DPY-4011: the database or network closed the connection

Output with the fix proposed in the linked pull request:

26.1.0b1: OK - still waiting on the redirected connection after 3.0s
Lingua principale
Python
Stelle
455
Fork
119
Metriche di merge delle PR
Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g

Preparare l'ambiente

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di oracle/python-oracledb

Tutte le issue di oracle/python-oracledb

Issue simili

Altre issue su Python

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.