Hacktoberfest 2026: le issue che i maintainer hanno segnato per ottobre, aperte e adatte ai principianti. Sfoglia le issue Hacktoberfest

Can resumed CI reuse successful matrix configurations?

Aperta
#4,447 0 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Valutazione

Difficoltà
5/5
Tempo stimato
Più di una settimana
Idoneità per principianti
42/100
Tipo di issue
Funzionalità
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Stato di attività
Attiva
Stack tecnologico
groovy

Direzione di ricerca

Inizia da jenkins/scripts/VersionSelectorScript.groovy e dallo node-test-commit-linux matrix-selection script, quindi segui MultiJobResumeControl e il comportamento di ripresa delle matrici di Jenkins. Convalida l’opt-in proposto rispetto ai casi documentati di successo, errore, ripresa ripetuta, metadati malformati e tutti i casi ignorati; il lavoro è completo quando le configurazioni riuscite vengono riutilizzate senza modificare i job che non hanno effettuato l’opt-in.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

Refs: https://openjs-foundation.slack.com/archives/C03BJP63CH0/p1787917001257859

I do not know Jenkins well enough to be confident about the implementation details. I asked an LLM to inspect the relevant build metadata, job configuration, and plugin sources. This is how I understand its suggestion.

Resume already seems to work between Multijob children. For example, node-test-commit #91372 reused the same builds for the twelve successful direct children from #91368.

The gap seems to be inside matrix jobs.

This uses node-test-commit-linux as a worked example. The intended scope is eventually all matrix jobs under node-test-commit, after checking their configurations individually.

node-test-commit-linux #72543 had ten configurations. Eight succeeded, alpine-last-latest-x64 was UNSTABLE, and rhel8-x64 was FAILURE. Its resume, #72548, ran all ten configurations again.

AFAICT, Multijob sees node-test-commit-linux as one unsuccessful child. It starts a new matrix parent, whose selector then selects every eligible configuration without considering the individual results from the build being resumed.

The suggested change is to extend VersionSelectorScript.groovy. Multijob already passes the previous child build through MultiJobResumeControl, so the selector could follow that lineage and exclude configurations whose newest exact result was SUCCESS.

The selector is also used by jobs outside the normal node-test-commit hierarchy. The proposed behavior is therefore opt-in and defaults to off. The example enables it for node-test-commit-linux first; the other matrix jobs under node-test-commit could opt in after being checked.

Suggested VersionSelectorScript.groovy diff
diff --git a/jenkins/scripts/VersionSelectorScript.groovy b/jenkins/scripts/VersionSelectorScript.groovy
--- a/jenkins/scripts/VersionSelectorScript.groovy
+++ b/jenkins/scripts/VersionSelectorScript.groovy
@@ -97,26 +97,109 @@
 // NOTE: this assumes that the default "Agents"->"Name" in the Configuration
 // Matrix is left as "nodes", if it's changed then `it.nodes` below won't work
 // and returning a result with a "nodes" property won't work.
 result['nodes'] = []

 // Before running this script, `def buildType = 'release'` or some other value
 // to be able to use the appropriate `buildType` in the exclusions
 def _buildType
 try {
   _buildType = buildType
 } catch (groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException e) {
   _buildType = 'test'
 }

 combinations.each{
   def builderLabel = it.nodes
   // Default to running all builders if nodeMajorVersion is still -1
   // (i.e. the version check failed)
   if (nodeMajorVersion >= 4) {
     if (!canBuild(nodeMajorVersion, builderLabel, _buildType)) {
       println "Skipping $builderLabel for Node.js $nodeMajorVersion"
       return
     }
   }
   result['nodes'].add(it)
 }
+
+// This is opt-in because this script is shared by jobs outside
+// node-test-commit.
+if (!(binding.hasVariable('reuseSuccessfulConfigurations') &&
+      binding.getVariable('reuseSuccessfulConfigurations') == true))
+  return
+
+// A resumed Multijob child carries the MatrixBuild it is resuming.
+// Avoid importing the action class because this script is evaluated by a
+// plugin whose class loader does not declare a Multijob dependency.
+def resumeControlClassName =
+  'com.tikal.jenkins.plugins.multijob.MultiJobResumeControl'
+def currentBuild = execution.build
+
+try {
+  def resumeControl = currentBuild.actions.find {
+    it.class.name == resumeControlClassName
+  }
+  def resumeSource = resumeControl?.run
+  def previousBuild = resumeSource
+  def latestResults = [:]
+  def seenBuilds = [] as Set
+
+  // Follow the complete resume lineage. getRuns() is deliberately not used:
+  // it may inherit a run from an unrelated matrix build which ran in between.
+  while (previousBuild != null) {
+    if (previousBuild.class.name != 'hudson.matrix.MatrixBuild' ||
+        previousBuild.parent != currentBuild.parent) {
+      throw new IllegalStateException(
+        "Unexpected resumed build ${previousBuild.externalizableId}")
+    }
+
+    if (!seenBuilds.add(previousBuild.externalizableId)) {
+      throw new IllegalStateException(
+        "Cycle in resume lineage at ${previousBuild.externalizableId}")
+    }
+
+    // The first exact run found for a combination is its newest result.
+    previousBuild.exactRuns.each { run ->
+      def combination = run.parent.combination
+      if (!latestResults.containsKey(combination))
+        latestResults[combination] = run.result
+    }
+
+    resumeControl = previousBuild.actions.find {
+      it.class.name == resumeControlClassName
+    }
+    previousBuild = resumeControl?.run
+  }
+
+  def successfulResumeCombinations = [] as Set
+  latestResults.each { combination, previousResult ->
+    if (previousResult?.toString() == 'SUCCESS')
+      successfulResumeCombinations.add(combination)
+  }
+
+  // Apply this after the normal version and MACHINES selection.
+  // If it would select no work, rerun the eligible set so a failure outside
+  // the individual cells cannot become a no-op success.
+  def eligibleCombinations = result['nodes']
+  def combinationsToRun = eligibleCombinations.findAll {
+    !successfulResumeCombinations.contains(it)
+  }
+  int skippedCount =
+    eligibleCombinations.size() - combinationsToRun.size()
+
+  if (skippedCount > 0) {
+    if (combinationsToRun.isEmpty()) {
+      println 'Resume would skip every eligible combination; running all'
+    } else {
+      println "Resume: reusing ${skippedCount} successful combination(s)"
+      // Otherwise Jenkins defaults to the immediately preceding matrix build,
+      // which may be unrelated to this resume.
+      currentBuild.setBaseBuild(resumeSource)
+      result['nodes'] = combinationsToRun
+    }
+  }
+} catch (Exception e) {
+  // Keep the normal selection on malformed or unexpected resume metadata.
+  println "Resume metadata could not be read; running all eligible " +
+    "combinations (${e.class.name}: ${e.message})"
+}

The node-test-commit-linux matrix-selection script would initially opt in with:

 buildType = 'test'
+reuseSuccessfulConfigurations = true

 evaluate(code)

My understanding of the proposed behavior is:

  • the existing version and MACHINES selection still runs first
  • jobs which do not opt in retain their current behavior
  • only exact SUCCESS results are reused
  • UNSTABLE, FAILURE, ABORTED, NOT_BUILT, and missing configurations run again
  • repeated resumes follow the explicit resume lineage
  • malformed or unexpected resume metadata leaves the existing full selection unchanged
  • if every configuration would be skipped, the eligible set runs again in case the matrix parent failed outside an individual configuration

The setBaseBuild() call is apparently needed so Jenkins inherits results from the matrix build actually being resumed, rather than whichever unrelated matrix build happened to run immediately before it.

Does this match how the matrix jobs are intended to resume? In particular:

  • Is VersionSelectorScript.groovy the right place to carry the existing Multijob resume behavior into matrix configurations?
  • Is making the behavior opt-in appropriate given the selector's other consumers?
  • If it works as expected for Linux, should the other matrix jobs under node-test-commit opt in as well?
Lingua principale
Jinja
Stelle
541
Fork
185
Merge medio
2g 18h
PR unite (30g)
6

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di nodejs/build

Tutte le issue di nodejs/build

Issue simili

Altre issue su Build System

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.