Hacktoberfest 2026: le issue che i maintainer hanno segnato per ottobre, aperte e adatte ai principianti. Sfoglia le issue Hacktoberfest

Kernel CI does not build drm-kmod, so LinuxKPI header regressions reach main green

Aperta
#201 0 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Valutazione

Difficoltà
4/5
Tempo stimato
3-5 giorni
Idoneità per principianti
52/100
Tipo di issue
Funzionalità
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Stato di attività
Tranquilla
Stack tecnologico
c, github-actions

Direzione di ricerca

Start with the kernel PR workflow and the drm-kmod build step in nextbsd-kernel-extensions, which the issue identifies as the existing reference. Check how the workflow can use the just-built kernel and restrict the check to PRs touching sys/compat/linuxkpi/. Done means those changes trigger a drm-kmod build (or the described header-check stopgap) and unrelated PRs do not incur the extra build.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

area:graphics

What happened

nextbsd/nextbsd-kernel#198 merged with all checks green and immediately broke the drm-kmod build in nextbsd-kernel-extensions — every amdgpu object failed with redefinition of 'resource'. Fixed in nextbsd/nextbsd-kernel#200; this issue is about the gap that let it through.

The gap

Patches under patches/ can modify sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/linux/*.h. Those headers have two consumers:

  1. the kernel itself — built by kernel (amd64) / kernel (arm64), and
  2. drm-kmod, built in a different repository (nextbsd-kernel-extensions) against the kernel's installed headers.

Only the first is a required check on a kernel PR. A change that is fine for the kernel but breaks the LinuxKPI include graph is invisible until someone opens an unrelated extensions PR — which is exactly how this surfaced.

That class of bug is easy to hit here: LinuxKPI has types that deliberately shadow FreeBSD ones (struct resource in <linux/ioport.h> vs sys/rman.h), so any new sys/*.h include in a LinuxKPI header can reorder definitions for consumers the kernel build never exercises.

Suggested fix

Add a check to the kernel PR workflow that builds drm-kmod against the just-built kernel — the same step nextbsd-kernel-extensions already runs — gated to PRs whose diff touches sys/compat/linuxkpi/, so the cost lands only on the PRs that can trigger it.

A cheaper stopgap, if the full build is too slow to gate on: compile a single translation unit that includes <linux/mfd/core.h> (which pulls platform_device.h then ioport.h) plus the other LinuxKPI headers with shadowing types. That would have caught this specific regression in seconds.

Related

  • nextbsd/nextbsd-kernel#200 — the fix
  • nextbsd/nextbsd-kernel#198 — the PR that introduced it
Lingua principale
C
Stelle
12
Fork
3
Merge medio
7h 1m
PR unite (30g)
7

Preparare l'ambiente

Questo progetto non fornisce container di sviluppo, Dockerfile né guida per i contributori, quindi l'ambiente è a tuo carico: parti dal suo README e consulta la nostra guida al primo contributo per i passaggi generali.

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di nextbsd/nextbsd-kernel

Tutte le issue di nextbsd/nextbsd-kernel

Issue simili

Altre issue su C

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.