Client.withBatch leaves per-request tasks pending when transport.send throws
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 55/100
Direzione di ricerca
Start with Client.withBatch(), Batch.addRequest(), and the single request Client.send() failure path described in the issue; use the existing MockTransport to reproduce the send failure with two Ping requests. Trace how pending request registration and continuation resumption are coordinated, including exactly-once cleanup. Done when each affected task receives the send error, its pending entry is removed, and unrelated requests remain unaffected.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Client.withBatch() propagates a transport send error to its caller, but does not propagate that failure to the tasks previously returned by Batch.addRequest().
How to found
After successfully connecting a client:
- Configure the transport to throw from
send()before delivering the batch, while keeping the receive stream open. - Add two requests inside
withBatch()and retain their returned task handles. - Catch the error thrown by
withBatch(). - Await the retained tasks without disconnecting or explicitly cancelling their requests.
The batch was not delivered, so no responses will arrive. However, the per-request tasks have no send-failure path that completes them.
This can be exercised using the existing MockTransport: complete initialization successfully, call setFailSend(true), then submit a batch of Ping requests.
Expected behavior
When sending the batch fails, its outstanding per-request tasks should complete with the send error, and their pending request entries should be removed.
Current code path
Batch.addRequest() returns an independent task that waits on a CheckedContinuation. Registration in pendingRequests happens through another asynchronous task:
Task {
await client.addPendingRequest(
id: request.id,
continuation: continuation,
type: M.Result.self
)
}
withBatch() subsequently sends the collected requests:
let data = try encoder.encode(requests)
try await connection.send(data)
There is no failure handler here to remove those pending requests or resume their continuations. Throwing from withBatch() does not automatically complete the separately created tasks.
By comparison, the single-request Client.send() path explicitly removes its pending request and resumes its continuation when sending fails.
Impact
Code awaiting the retained batch task results can remain suspended after the outer batch call has already failed. Registered pending requests also remain retained until another path handles them, such as explicit request cancellation or client disconnection.
This report concerns local transport send failure with no response received. It does not concern a successfully delivered batch containing JSON-RPC error responses, which already has response-handling logic.
my suggestion
I think withBatch() should propagate a send failure to all still-pending requests belonging to that batch, without affecting unrelated requests.
The fix also needs to account for asynchronous registration in Batch.addRequest(): simply removing currently registered IDs in a catch block may miss a continuation registered after cleanup. Registration and failure handling should be coordinated, while preserving exactly-once continuation resumption.
Related work
- #113 provides relevant exactly-once cleanup behavior for individual requests and response handling, but does not add batch send-failure cleanup.
- #210 and #213 change
withBatch()to return the closure’s result; their diffs leave the transport send-failure path without cleanup. - #314 adds rejection of batching for its modern protocol mode, rather than repairing failure handling in the existing batching path.
I did not find an existing issue or PR specifically addressing this failure path in the searches performed. If this issue and repair directions are correct, I am willing to open a PR.
- Lingua principale
- Swift
- Stelle
- 1.6k
- Fork
- 270
- Merge medio
- 2g 7h
- PR unite (30g)
- 15
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di modelcontextprotocol/swift-sdk
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 73/100
modelcontextprotocol/swift-sdk#327 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
Value decoding changes data-URL-looking JSON strings into Value.dataForse già presa @bitbemol l’ha presa 72 giorni fa. Apertabug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
modelcontextprotocol/swift-sdk#277 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
enhancement
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 78/100
modelcontextprotocol/swift-sdk#274 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
`HTTPClientTransport` fails to build on Windows: `#if !os(Linux)` guards no longer match the `EventSource` platform conditionForse di nuovo libera Una pull request per questa issue è stata chiusa senza essere unita. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 85/100
modelcontextprotocol/swift-sdk#261 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
NetworkTransport drops a JSON message when a TCP receive contains a heartbeat followed by the messageForse già presa @bbdu3 l’ha presa 4 giorni fa. Apertabug
Difficoltà 3/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 25/100
modelcontextprotocol/swift-sdk#322 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
Tutte le issue di modelcontextprotocol/swift-sdk
Issue simili
-
[java] TestClassWithoutTestCases: document that abstract classes and interfaces are not checkedAperta
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 91/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
文件夹设置bugAperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 62/100
joeseesun/qiaomu-jot#14 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
30-minutes algorithm any-language beginner-friendly c community cpp csharp data-structures go good first issue hacktoberfest help wanted kotlin learning leetcode php ruby rust swift
Difficoltà 2/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 85/100
Huerte/algo-solutions-python#211 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
area: build-and-ci S3: minor
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
manaflow-ai/cmux#39902 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno