[Task][RFC]: Qualify the effective manager runtime profile across sessions
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Idoneità per principianti
- 25/100
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- python
- Ambito
- ai-infra-agents
Direzione di ricerca
Read the canonical RFC and start with loopx/capabilities/manager_runtime/machine_profile.py, loopx/chat_manager.py, and apps/presentation/dashboard; coordinate with the current owners and #5187 before choosing an unowned acceptance gap. Verify the effective profile across the real supported endpoint and the affected CLI/frontend entrypoints, then report commands and passed, failed, and untested evidence against the acceptance checklist.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Outcome / 目标
验收管家有效运行配置与会话一致性。One task tracks this RFC's delivery; keep implementation PRs and milestone evidence here instead of creating a parallel task tree.
Canonical design: RFC. Roadmap: S1/S4/S9 · manager M1, under #4574. Design acceptance is distinct from implementation, live qualification and promotion.
Current boundary
Source audit: main at ce3862e33 (2026-09-28). This is source/PR inspection, not a new test or live-qualification claim.
The machine-level restricted/trusted_owner configuration, controller integration and focused tests are already recorded as shipped. The RFC explicitly separates that implementation from deployment and full M1 qualification.
Work remaining
- Verify the effective config, sandbox, prompt, workspace instructions and active upstream Session agree on the real supported endpoint.
- Finish restart/profile-change/downgrade recovery and existing settings readback without adding a second configuration source.
Ownership and ongoing work
Reuse #4339 and current manager/App work; coordinate with #5187 settings consolidation. This RFC owns profile consistency, not general handoff, outbox or a new permission system.
Contribution route: implementation/integration overlaps active work. Start from the linked current owners/PRs and identify an unowned acceptance gap in a claim comment; do not begin a competing rewrite.
Acceptance
- Default/invalid config remains restricted with actionable repair; unsupported endpoints do not pretend to enforce trusted_owner.
- A material profile change rotates the upstream thread while preserving visible history; unrelated settings do not rotate it.
- External audiences remain restricted absent the existing scoped grant; protected operations retain their own authorization. CLI and actual frontend expose the effective Session profile.
- Reconcile the RFC's current delivery checkpoint and this issue with the integrated revision, commands, passed/failed/untested evidence and remaining gates. Close the accepted scope only; no claim that a merged PR alone completes the RFC.
Starting points and delivery boundary
- loopx/capabilities/manager_runtime/machine_profile.py
- loopx/chat_manager.py
- apps/presentation/dashboard
Base: latest main. Reuse the existing typed owner and provider boundaries. Include affected CLI/frontend/Lark companions; verify real entrypoints and backend where changed. Preserve existing first-screen review and maintainer merge gates. Public artifacts contain only synthetic/public-safe evidence, no private operational state. This task does not authorize provider promotion, benchmark launches, release/deployment or unrelated protected effects.
- Lingua principale
- Python
- Stelle
- 6.2k
- Fork
- 596
- Merge medio
- 7h 35m
- PR unite (30g)
- 928
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di loopx-project/loopx
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 84/100
loopx-project/loopx#6842 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
loopx-project/loopx#6108 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
loopx-project/loopx#5688 · 2 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 60/100
loopx-project/loopx#5632 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
loopx-project/loopx#5443 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di loopx-project/loopx
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 62/100
foxglove/mcap#1907 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
namespace operations
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 72/100
EclipseFdn/open-vsx.org#14623 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
developmentseed/titiler-cmr#261 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
andrewyng/openworker#774 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
aggfuncAperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
worldbank/blackmarblepy#160 ·