LS_RELEASE lookup swallows skopeo pull failures, so -lsN restarts at ls1 and an existing tag gets overwritten
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 48/100
Direzione di ricerca
Start with the LS_RELEASE lookup and retry_ghcr in ansible/roles/repository/templates/Jenkinsfile.j2, then trace how an empty result reaches LS_TAG_NUMBER and the push steps. Reproduce the failure path from the linked Jenkins logs and review the existing retry logic. Done means lookup failures cannot silently produce and push ls1 over an existing tag, while a genuinely new image can still start at ls1.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Is there an existing issue for this?
- I have searched the existing issues
This is the failure described in linuxserver/docker-wireguard#333 ("Every once in a while it fails and starts from 1"). I'm reporting it again because this time it also overwrote an existing version tag, and both affected builds still finished SUCCESS.
Current Behavior
The LS_RELEASE step in ansible/roles/repository/templates/Jenkinsfile.j2 (line 136 @ 4c0cbaf):
retry_ghcr docker run --rm quay.io/skopeo/stable:v1 inspect docker://ghcr.io/${LS_USER}/${CONTAINER_NAME}:{{ release_tag }} \
| jq -r '.Labels.build_version' | awk '{print $3}' | grep '\\-ls' || :
retry_ghcr(L16–50, added in 583e5c0) only retries when stderr matchesretry-after:|toomanyrequests|too many requests. A quay.io 502 while pulling the skopeo image fails right away.|| :hides the failure, soLS_RELEASEis empty.LS_RELEASE_NUMBERis then empty too, andLS_TAG_NUMBER(L171–182) becomes$(( + 1)), which is1.- The build tags, pushes and releases
<version>-ls1and ends withFinished: SUCCESS.
Seen on Docker-Pipeline-Builders/docker-sonarr/master:
- #893 (2026-10-20): the skopeo pull worked. It read
4.0.20.3014-ls329and built4.0.20.3014-ls330.
https://ci.linuxserver.io/job/Docker-Pipeline-Builders/job/docker-sonarr/job/master/893/consoleText - #894 (2026-10-20, a few minutes later):
It then builtdocker: unknown: failed to copy: httpReadSeeker: failed open: unexpected status from GET request to https://quay.io/v2/skopeo/stable/blobs/sha256:f7f612bb210ed468b26a040ac658f93fe06dd02bd9b1b324743949933127de0f: 502 Bad GatewayMETA_TAG: '4.0.20.3014-ls1', pushed it, created GitHub release4.0.20.3014-ls1, and ended withSUCCESS.
https://ci.linuxserver.io/job/Docker-Pipeline-Builders/job/docker-sonarr/job/master/894/consoleText - #896 (2026-10-24 01:45 UTC): another quay.io 502 (
blobs/sha256:ec1cf86ab7be…). It producedMETA_TAG: '4.0.20.3014-ls1'again and pushed new images over the existing4.0.20.3014-ls1tag. Creating the GitHub release then failed withValidation Failed/already_exists, and the build still ended withSUCCESS.
https://ci.linuxserver.io/job/Docker-Pipeline-Builders/job/docker-sonarr/job/master/896/consoleText
So 4.0.20.3014-ls1 now points at a different image than the one released on 2026-10-20, and no GitHub release exists for the new image.
Expected Behavior
If the previous -lsN can't be determined, the build should not continue and push. For example:
- Retry the skopeo pull/inspect on 5xx and network errors too, not only on 429. Since
retry_ghcrwas only just added, extending its match to 5xx errors (502 Bad Gateway,unexpected status) would cover this case. - If
LS_RELEASEis still empty after the retries while the release tag exists, fail the build instead of continuing with an empty number. A genuinely new image, where the tag doesn't exist yet, would still start atls1. - Optionally, refuse to push a
META_TAGthat already exists in the registry.
That keeps version tags immutable, in line with the reproducibility policy stated in other issues.
Steps To Reproduce
Not reproducible on demand. It happens whenever quay.io/skopeo/stable:v1 can't be pulled on a builder that doesn't have it cached. The console logs above show both cases.
Environment / Docker creation / Container logs
Not applicable: this is a CI/tagging problem, not a runtime problem. The relevant logs are the Jenkins console logs linked above.
- Lingua principale
- Jinja
- Stelle
- 20
- Fork
- 26
- Merge medio
- 3g 3h
- PR unite (30g)
- 6
Preparare l'ambiente
- Include un Dockerfile o un file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
enhancement
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[guide] AGENTS.md claims the coverage gate, e2e and full lint run on every PR after ADR 0011 focused validationForse già presa @hivecommons-hive l’ha presa oggi. Apertaagent/guide documentation hive/claimed-by-guide stage/040-covered-by-pr
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 81/100
cncf/endusers#2006 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno