graphql-core coerce_string used instead of graphene.String
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 35/100
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia tracciando la gestione degli scalari attraverso graphene/types/schema.py e confronta graphene/types/scalars.py con graphql/type/scalars.py. Riproduci il caso HttpUrl usando graphene.test.Client.execute, quindi determina se la correzione prevista consiste nel preservare la coercizione di graphene.String o nell’allinearla a graphql-core. Il lavoro è completato quando il comportamento e la coercizione prevista sono coperti da un test di regressione.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Note: for support questions, please use stackoverflow. This repository's issues are reserved for feature requests and bug reports.
- What is the current behavior?
Not 100% sure this is a bug, but it seems not quite right.
graphene.String has the following coerce_string method:
https://github.com/graphql-python/graphene/blob/master/graphene/types/scalars.py#L144
This should mean that any value that is resolved via a graphene.String field gets cast to str
In contrast, graphql-core has this coerce_string method:
https://github.com/graphql-python/graphql-core/blob/a2d52df815f81a62649ee637999fc241af1e67a3/src/graphql/type/scalars.py#L176
...note that in graphql-core any value which passes an isinstance(val, str) check will not get cast to str.
I noticed this because I am using pydantic HttpUrl type in my parent object, the value is an HttpUrl instance (which passes an isinstance(val, str) check).
I noticed in my test cases that the HttpUrl value passes untouched through the graphene.test.Client.execute flow.
Looking at the graphene src this was puzzling because it seemed like it should get cast down to a plain string.
Stepping through with ipdb, I could see in complete_value method:
ipdb> pp result
HttpUrl('https://example.com/test-url, scheme='https', host='example.com', tld='com', host_type='domain', path='test-url')
ipdb> return_type
<graphql.type.definition.GraphQLScalarType object at 0x1059876a0>
ipdb> import inspect
ipdb> inspect.getsource(return_type.serialize)
'def coerce_string(value):\n # type: (Any) -> str\n if isinstance(value, string_types):\n return value\n\n if isinstance(value, bool):\n return u"true" if value else u"false"\n\n return text_type(value)\n'
ipdb> inspect.getsourcefile(return_type.serialize)
'/lib/python3.8/site-packages/graphql/type/scalars.py'
...so we have a graphql-core field rather than a graphene one, which explains why the cast to str didn't happen.
I am guessing it may be due to this code:
https://github.com/graphql-python/graphene/blob/f039af2810806ab42521426777b3a0d061b02802/graphene/types/schema.py#L148
Which raises the question... are the methods on graphene.String and friends just dead code?
Or if they're still used in some other circumstance, should they maybe delegate to corresponding graphql-core methods for sake of consistency, rather than having their own subtly different implementation?
If I change my type def to:
import graphene
class HttpUrl(graphene.String):
pass
class MyParent(graphene.ObjectType):
some_url = HttpUrl(required=True)
...then I get the graphene casting behaviour, again I think because we fall thru this check https://github.com/graphql-python/graphene/blob/f039af2810806ab42521426777b3a0d061b02802/graphene/types/schema.py#L148 and don't substitute a graphql-core type.
In the end this behaviour didn't break anything for me, but it's probably possible to imagine a scenario where it would.
- Lingua principale
- Python
- Stelle
- 8.2k
- Fork
- 818
- Metriche di merge delle PR
- Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g
Guida per i contributori
Nessuna guida per i contributori indicizzata per questo repository
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di graphql-python/graphene
-
Tutorial mistakes Aperta🐛 bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
graphql-python/graphene#1389 · 5 commenti · 2 reazioni ·
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 68/100
graphql-python/graphene#1606 ·
-
Python 3.14 support Aperta✨ enhancement
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 38/100
graphql-python/graphene#1601 · 2 commenti ·
-
✨ enhancement
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 42/100
graphql-python/graphene#1600 ·
-
🐛 bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 55/100
graphql-python/graphene#1593 ·
Tutte le issue di graphql-python/graphene
Issue simili
-
agent-ready documentation needs-triage
Difficoltà 1/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 88/100
-
documentation
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 91/100
-
workflow-status page template still says reusable workflows are "triggered only by workflow_call:" Aperta
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 92/100
-
instance instance add
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 72/100
searxng/searx-instances#939 · 1 commento ·
-
area-deployment area-integrations triage:bot-seen
Difficoltà 2/5 Mezza giornata Idoneità per principianti 86/100