McpToolset hangs silently for ~5 minutes per retry (3 retries) when stdio command is an npm shim ("npx") on Windows
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Valutazione
Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.
Descrizione
Description
The examples/mcpfilesystem sample — and any McpToolset built with
command("npx") — appears to hang indefinitely on Windows. No error is
printed and no node.exe process is ever spawned; the caller just blocks
inside McpToolset.getTools().
After digging into it, the "hang" is actually a very slow failure loop:
each initialization attempt waits out the full default
initializationTimeout (5 minutes), and the sync retry logic re-runs the
same doomed initialization, so the program stays silent for a measured
900 seconds (~15 minutes: 3 attempts x 5-minute timeout) before a
McpToolLoadingException (wrapped
Client failed to initialize by explicit API call) finally surfaces —
and even that is invisible unless an SLF4J provider is on the classpath,
which the samples don't include by default.
Environment
- OS: Windows 11 Home (10.0.26200)
- JDK: Oracle 21.0.5
- google-adk: 1.13.0
- Maven: 3.9.8
- Node.js: 24.15.0 (npx 11.12.1, standard npm-for-Windows install with
npx.cmdshim)
Root cause
On Windows, npm installs command shims as batch scripts (npx.cmd), not
executables. Java's ProcessBuilder cannot execute a bare npx command
(it is not a PE executable and is not resolved through PATHEXT), so the
stdio subprocess never starts.
A plain new ProcessBuilder("npx", "-v").start() on the same machine
fails immediately with CreateProcess error=2, which confirms the
JVM/OS-level cause. Inside ADK, however, the failure is masked by:
McpSessionManager.initializeSession(...)defaults the
initializationTimeoutto 5 minutes
(core/src/main/java/com/google/adk/tools/mcp/McpSessionManager.java,
theDuration.ofMinutes(5)fallback), soclient.initialize()waits
for a response from a process that never started.- The sync
McpToolset.getTools()retry logic (MAX_RETRIES = 3,
100 ms delay) then re-runs the same doomed initialization. - Without an SLF4J provider (the default for the samples), even the
retry ERROR logs are swallowed, leaving zero output on the console.
Observed log once an SLF4J provider is added (full run, timestamps from
the measured repro):
ERROR com.google.adk.tools.mcp.McpToolset - Unexpected error during tool loading, retry attempt 1
java.lang.RuntimeException: Client failed to initialize by explicit API call
at io.modelcontextprotocol.client.LifecycleInitializer...
ERROR ... retry attempt 2
ERROR ... retry attempt 3
ERROR com.google.adk.tools.mcp.McpToolset - Failed to load tools after multiple retries due to unexpected error.
com.google.adk.tools.mcp.McpToolsetException$McpToolLoadingException
(total elapsed: 900,857 ms)
Minimal reproduction (public API only)
StdioServerParameters params = StdioServerParameters.builder()
.command("npx") // hangs; "npx.cmd" works
.args(ImmutableList.of(
"-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem", "<some-dir>"))
.build();
McpToolset toolset = new McpToolset(params.toServerParameters());
List<BaseTool> tools = toolset.getTools(null).toList().blockingGet();
// blocks: ~5 min per attempt, up to 3 retries, then throws
Observed behavior
| command | result |
|---|---|
npx |
silent block, measured 900 s (~15 min) total, then McpToolLoadingException; no node.exe ever spawned |
npx.cmd |
OK in ~3.5 s, 14 tools loaded |
Workaround
Use the .cmd extension explicitly on Windows:
.command("npx.cmd")
Suggestions
- Add a Windows note to
examples/mcpfilesystem/README.md(lowest
effort, immediate relief for new users). - Optionally, fail fast with a clear error when the configured command
cannot be executed at all (e.g. probe withProcessBuilder.start()
before the 5-minute timeout), or auto-map well-known npm shims
(npx/npm/node) to their.cmdvariants on Windows.
Happy to send a PR for either suggestion. Thanks!
- Lingua principale
- Java
- Stelle
- 1.8k
- Fork
- 442
- Merge medio
- 3g 13h
- PR unite (30g)
- 95
Preparare l'ambiente
Avvia il container di sviluppo del progetto nel browser, con il tuo account GitHub.
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di google/adk-java
-
InMemorySessionService.appendEvent recreates a deleted sessionForse già presa @hirematha l’ha presa 5 giorni fa. Apertaneeds review
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 84/100
google/adk-java#1697 · 2 commenti · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Runner drops callbackContextData written in onUserMessageCallback when it resumes an invocationForse già presa @hirematha l’ha presa 5 giorni fa. Apertaneeds review
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
google/adk-java#1695 · 1 commento · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[spring-ai] Wrapping ChatModels without getOptions() override fail with ClassCastException when ADK tools are attachedForse già presa @hirematha l’ha presa 1 giorno fa. Aperta
google/adk-java#1731 · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
AgentExecutor ignores the A2A contextId when creating a session, so multi-turn conversations start over every turnForse già presa @hirematha l’ha presa 3 giorni fa. Apertaneeds review
google/adk-java#1718 · 2 commenti · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
runLive passes partial events to appendEvent and never aggregates text chunks, unlike ADK PythonForse già presa @hemasekhar-p l’ha presa 18 giorni fa. Apertaneeds review
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 45/100
google/adk-java#1648 · 3 commenti · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di google/adk-java
Issue simili
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
breaking change bug needs human review not ready priority medium size S
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
martin-francois/symphony-trello#1193 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Mend: dependency security vulnerability
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100