Hacktoberfest 2026: le issue che i maintainer hanno segnato per ottobre, aperte e adatte ai principianti. Sfoglia le issue Hacktoberfest

[curriculum-eval] curriculum-scorecard: overall page scores and trend analysis

Aperta Adatta ai principianti
#5,035 0 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Valutazione

Difficoltà
2/5
Tempo stimato
1-3 ore
Idoneità per principianti
66/100
Tipo di issue
Documentazione
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Stato di attività
Attiva
Stack tecnologico
github-actions, javascript

Direzione di ricerca

La scheda di valutazione elenca le pagine interessate sotto workshop/ e afferma che il rilevatore dei checkpoint confonde le emoji con gli shortcode :white_check_mark: e :clipboard:. Inizia leggendo il ticket del rilevatore presentato insieme a questa scheda e ispeziona il punto di ingresso del calcolo dei punteggi del curriculum che genera queste tabelle. Il lavoro è completo quando i punteggi riportati e l’analisi delle tendenze tengono conto della discrepanza degli shortcode; verifica i risultati sulle pagine indicate e sui totali del corpus.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

curriculum documentation quality
Part Summary
Part Files Mean Score Std Dev
Part 1 — core path (lessons 00–14) 55 6.13 / 10.0 ±0.63
Part 2 — advanced (lessons 15+) 38 5.98 / 10.0 ±0.36
Overall corpus 94 6.06 / 10.0 ±0.54

Flag threshold: 5.52. Five files fall below it (see findings). Systemic caveat: the rubric reports 92 of 94 learning pages as missing a checkpoint and all 94 as missing "Before You Start", but the pages do have them. The detector regexes match the literal emoji ✅ / 📋, while the workshop writes :white_check_mark: / :clipboard:. Absolute scores are deflated by roughly 2.5–3 points. See the detector issue filed alongside this scorecard.

Part 1 Scores (lessons 00–14)
File Overall Score
workshop/side-quest-01-02-environment-reference.md 4.93 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-11-06-anthropic-key.md 5.37 / 10.0
workshop/04-github-actions-intro.md 5.39 / 10.0
workshop/05-agentic-workflows-intro.md 5.43 / 10.0
workshop/14b-pr-reviewer-workflow.md 5.45 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-05-03-two-file-structure.md 5.50 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-11-08-frontmatter-tools-outputs.md 5.55 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-11-01b-workflow-structure.md 5.59 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-13-04-token-optimization.md 5.59 / 10.0
workshop/08-run-your-workflow.md 5.67 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-11-04-annotated-workflow.md 5.67 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-11-09-agent-session-phases.md 5.69 / 10.0
workshop/05b-agentic-workflows-security.md 5.75 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-06-03a-copilot-requests-permission.md 5.75 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-11-05-event-triggers.md 5.77 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-05-01-actions-power-user.md 5.81 / 10.0
workshop/14-next-steps.md 5.83 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-06-03-copilot-token.md 5.83 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-10-02-jailbreak-brief.md 5.85 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-09-02-schedule-expressions.md 5.87 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-11-07-openai-key.md 5.87 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-09-01f-debugging-checklist.md 5.90 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-12-01-iterate-agent-output.md 5.91 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-10-03-skill-dispatcher.md 5.95 / 10.0
workshop/08b-interpret-your-run.md 5.99 / 10.0
workshop/09-agentic-editing.md 5.99 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-08-01-codespaces-actions-write.md 6.01 / 10.0
workshop/02a-setup-codespace.md 6.09 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-10-01-agent-brief.md 6.09 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-09-01-debug-output.md 6.11 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-09-01a-pattern-long-plan-chain.md 6.12 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-05-02-aw-deep-dive.md 6.13 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-07d-billing-paths.md 6.13 / 10.0
workshop/05c-agentic-workflows-practice.md 6.22 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-11-03-better-prompts.md 6.24 / 10.0
workshop/07-your-first-workflow.md 6.25 / 10.0
workshop/07d-confirm-model-access.md 6.25 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-02-01-local-terminal.md 6.25 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-01-01-terminal-basics.md 6.26 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-09-01c-pattern-safe-output-blocked.md 6.31 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-09-01b-pattern-empty-results.md 6.33 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-09-01d-pattern-permission-denied.md 6.35 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-06-01-install-troubleshooting.md 6.39 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-09-01e-pattern-done-no-write.md 6.39 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-06-03c-copilot-github-token-ui-only.md 6.45 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-07-01-compile-workflow.md 6.45 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-13-03-pr-checklist-pattern.md 6.45 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-01-03-permission-errors.md 6.53 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-06-04-install-local.md 6.67 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-06-03b-copilot-github-token.md 6.71 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-11-02-yaml-frontmatter.md 6.82 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-11-01-frontmatter-deep-dive.md 6.97 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-06-02-cca-codespace.md 7.19 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-13-02-pr-summary-pattern.md 8.39 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-13-01-pr-labeler-pattern.md 8.59 / 10.0
Part 2 Scores (lessons 15+)
File Overall Score
workshop/side-quest-17-07-repo-poisoning.md 4.95 / 10.0
workshop/15-conditional-logic.md 5.53 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-20-01-memory-patterns.md 5.53 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-22-01-failure-modes.md 5.57 / 10.0
workshop/17-add-mcp-tools.md 5.61 / 10.0
workshop/20-persistent-memory.md 5.67 / 10.0
workshop/29-skills-and-domain-knowledge.md 5.69 / 10.0
workshop/16-connect-data-source.md 5.71 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-16-02-secrets-and-permissions.md 5.75 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-17-02-security-architecture.md 5.75 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-16-03-token-exfiltration.md 5.77 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-17-03-prompt-injection.md 5.81 / 10.0
workshop/18-share-and-reuse.md 5.82 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-23-01-ab-roundrobin.md 5.83 / 10.0
workshop/26-manage-costs-and-budgets.md 5.85 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-17-01-mcp-concepts.md 5.87 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-17-04-permission-escalation.md 5.89 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-16-05-long-lived-credentials.md 5.93 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-25-01-audit-reference.md 5.93 / 10.0
workshop/21-inline-sub-agents.md 5.97 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-17-06-output-injection.md 5.97 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-16-04-deterministic-vs-agentic-data-ops.md 6.01 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-17-05-supply-chain-mcp.md 6.01 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-15-01-expressions-and-contexts.md 6.03 / 10.0
workshop/30-preview-with-staged-mode.md 6.05 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-24-01-runner-infrastructure.md 6.07 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-29-01-skill-injection-strategies.md 6.09 / 10.0
workshop/28-orchestrate-workflows.md 6.13 / 10.0
workshop/25-audit-and-observability.md 6.15 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-26-01-forecast-costs.md 6.20 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-15-02-chaining-conditions.md 6.21 / 10.0
workshop/19-research-driven-training-node.md 6.37 / 10.0
workshop/22-error-handling-and-resilience.md 6.37 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-16-01-github-output.md 6.44 / 10.0
workshop/24-self-hosted-runners.md 6.45 / 10.0
workshop/27-evaluate-workflow-quality.md 6.57 / 10.0
workshop/23-ab-experiments.md 6.67 / 10.0
workshop/side-quest-21-01-sub-agent-syntax.md 6.91 / 10.0
Other Scores (no lesson number)
File Overall Score
workshop/side-quest-enterprise-setup.md 5.71 / 10.0
Score Trends (history window: 20 commits)

Only pages with a non-trivial delta are listed individually below; all 94 pages were compared and every page not listed is stable with |delta| ≤ 0.10 (most are exactly +0.00).

File Baseline Latest Delta Direction
workshop/side-quest-11-09-agent-session-phases.md 7.69 5.69 -2.00 declining
workshop/side-quest-12-01-iterate-agent-output.md 7.91 5.91 -2.00 declining
workshop/18-share-and-reuse.md 6.15 5.82 -0.33 declining
workshop/side-quest-01-03-permission-errors.md 6.79 6.53 -0.26 declining
workshop/side-quest-11-05-event-triggers.md 5.87 5.77 -0.10 stable
workshop/side-quest-11-08-frontmatter-tools-outputs.md 5.64 5.55 -0.09 stable
workshop/side-quest-09-01a-pattern-long-plan-chain.md 6.20 6.12 -0.08 stable
workshop/29-skills-and-domain-knowledge.md 5.75 5.69 -0.06 stable
workshop/side-quest-24-01-runner-infrastructure.md 6.13 6.07 -0.06 stable
workshop/side-quest-11-02-yaml-frontmatter.md 6.88 6.82 -0.06 stable
workshop/side-quest-06-02-cca-codespace.md 7.25 7.19 -0.06 stable
workshop/side-quest-09-01f-debugging-checklist.md 5.96 5.90 -0.06 stable
workshop/22-error-handling-and-resilience.md 6.35 6.37 +0.02 stable
workshop/23-ab-experiments.md 6.65 6.67 +0.02 stable
workshop/side-quest-01-02-environment-reference.md 4.93 4.93 +0.00 stable
workshop/side-quest-17-07-repo-poisoning.md 4.97 4.95 -0.02 stable
workshop/04-github-actions-intro.md 5.39 5.39 +0.00 stable
workshop/05-agentic-workflows-intro.md 5.43 5.43 +0.00 stable

The two −2.00 drops (side-quest-11-09, side-quest-12-01) match the exact weight of the checkpoint dimension, so a checkpoint was probably lost or reformatted (for example to the :white_check_mark: shortcode) in those files. That is consistent with the detector bug above.

Overall Trend
  • Baseline mean score: 6.13
  • Latest mean score: 6.06
  • Delta: -0.07
  • Direction: stable
Bloom's Taxonomy audit

Distribution (94 files): remember 8, understand 15, apply 51, analyze 7, evaluate 5, create 8. The shape is a healthy pyramid with a heavy Apply base. has_min_understand_steps = true (15) and has_min_analyze_steps = true (7), so there are no gap proposals.

Per-file reclassification (justification is the one-sentence cue from corpus.bloom_reclassification; all files use "Primary cues: ..."):

  • remember (8): 21-inline-sub-agents (title/intro: reference), 29-skills-and-domain-knowledge (intro: reference, glossary), side-quest-01-02-environment-reference (title/intro: reference), side-quest-11-01-frontmatter-deep-dive, side-quest-11-02-yaml-frontmatter, side-quest-20-01-memory-patterns, side-quest-21-01-sub-agent-syntax, side-quest-25-01-audit-reference (all reference-style cues)
  • understand (15): 04-github-actions-intro, 05-agentic-workflows-intro, side-quest-05-01, 05-02, 05-03, 10-02-jailbreak-brief, 11-01b-workflow-structure, 11-09-agent-session-phases, 15-01-expressions-and-contexts, 16-03-token-exfiltration, 16-04-deterministic-vs-agentic-data-ops, 17-02-security-architecture, 17-03-prompt-injection, 17-04-permission-escalation, 17-05-supply-chain-mcp (title/intro: intro, introduction, explain-style cues)
  • apply (51): all remaining install/setup/run/configure/schedule pages, including 02a, 05b, 05c, 07d, 08, 08b, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 22, 24, 25, 26, 30, and 34 side quests (cues: install, run, configure, use, schedule, commands_or_code)
  • analyze (7): side-quest-09-01-debug-output, 09-01c, 09-01d, 09-01f, 12-01-iterate-agent-output, 16-01-github-output, 17-06-output-injection
  • evaluate (5): 09-agentic-editing (review/test), 23-ab-experiments (test), 27-evaluate-workflow-quality (evaluate/review), side-quest-13-01, 13-03 (checkpoint/review cues)
  • create (8): 07-your-first-workflow (create/write), 14b-pr-reviewer-workflow (create/build), 19-research-driven-training-node, 28-orchestrate-workflows (build/compose), side-quest-09-01e, 11-03-better-prompts, 13-02-pr-summary-pattern, 17-07-repo-poisoning

Caveat: the classifier is keyword-based. side-quest-17-07-repo-poisoning is an attack-and-defend exercise and reads more like Analyze/Evaluate than Create.

Corpus-level observations
  • Checkpoint/scaffolding coverage: the real coverage is high, but the rubric cannot see it (detector bug).
  • Length variance: side-quest-01-02 (1,433 words) and side-quest-17-07 (1,234 words) are well over the 800-word ideal; most steps are 650–800 words.
  • Active learning: concept-heavy pages (04, 05) have density < 4 because their activities are tables and reflection prompts rather than code blocks.

Fix prompt for the corpus: see the detector issue ("curriculum_assessment.py: checkpoint and prerequisite detection ignores :white_check_mark: / :clipboard: shortcodes").

Generated by 🔬 Curriculum Quality Evaluator · copilot · auto · ~40 AIC · ⌖ ~1 AIC · ⊞ 5K · ◷

  • expires on Oct 28, 2026, 3:43 AM UTC
Lingua principale
JavaScript
Stelle
55
Fork
36
Merge medio
2g 8h
PR unite (30g)
17

Preparare l'ambiente

Apri in Codespaces

Avvia il container di sviluppo del progetto nel browser, con il tuo account GitHub.

  • Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
  • Nessun modello di pull request
  • Nessuna guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di githubnext/gh-aw-workshop

Tutte le issue di githubnext/gh-aw-workshop

Issue simili

Altre issue su JavaScript

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.