Hacktoberfest 2026: le issue che i maintainer hanno segnato per ottobre, aperte e adatte ai principianti. Sfoglia le issue Hacktoberfest

[workshop-sim] Repair: Fix checkpoint-quality regex in curriculum_assessment.py to recognize :white_check_mark: shortcode headings

Chiusa Adatta ai principianti
  • Qualcosa non va?
#4,249 0 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Valutazione

Difficoltà
2/5
Tempo stimato
1-3 ore
Idoneità per principianti
78/100
Tipo di issue
Bug
Chiarezza
Specificata chiaramente
Stato di attività
Attiva
Stack tecnologico
markdown, python
Ambito
testing, tooling

Direzione di ricerca

Inizia da .github/skills/curriculum-quantitative-assessment/curriculum_assessment.py ed esamina CHECKPOINT_RE e i test di score_checkpoint_quality(). Esegui la valutazione sui file del workshop e conferma che vengano rilevati sia i titoli con il ✅ letterale sia quelli con :white_check_mark:. Il lavoro è completato quando i checkpoint vengono valutati in base al contenuto delle relative checklist, il Learning KPI della coorte migliora e nessun contenuto del workshop cambia.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

feedback simulation workshop
Problem statement

.github/skills/curriculum-quantitative-assessment/curriculum_assessment.py scores checkpoint_quality as 0.0/10 for all 30 main workshop steps, even though every step (confirmed on 04-github-actions-intro.md, 07-your-first-workflow.md, 07d-confirm-model-access.md, 08-run-your-workflow.md, and others) ends with a properly formatted ## :white_check_mark: Checkpoint section containing a markdown checklist, exactly as required by AGENTS.md. The detection regex CHECKPOINT_RE = re.compile(r"##\s+✅\s*Checkpoint", re.IGNORECASE) only matches the literal unicode ✅ emoji character, but the workshop's actual convention (and AGENTS.md's own documented style) uses the GitHub Markdown shortcode :white_check_mark:. This silently zeroes out one-third of the weight in the Learning KPI index (checkpoint_quality carries a 2.0 weight alongside active_learning) for every single page in the corpus, masking genuine scaffolding and making the Learning KPI index (currently 2.87/10) artificially pessimistic.

Proposed change

Update CHECKPOINT_RE to also match the :white_check_mark: shortcode form, e.g.:

CHECKPOINT_RE = re.compile(
    r"##\s+(?:✅|:white_check_mark:)\s*Checkpoint", re.IGNORECASE
)

Re-run the assessment script against all workshop files and confirm has_checkpoint becomes True and checkpoint_quality is scored on its actual content-quality criteria (not zeroed) for every page with a real checkpoint section.

Failure mode classification

Learning barrier (measurement defect) — this is not a dropout-causing problem for learners, but it is a content-quality measurement gap that misrepresents the curriculum's actual scaffolding quality and would misdirect future repair priorities if left uncorrected.

Quantitative guardrail

Current cohort-wide values: checkpoint_quality mean 0.0/10 across all 30 steps (every step affected identically), Learning KPI index (2.0×4.15 + 2.0×0.0 + 1.5×5.0)/5.5 ≈ 2.87. After the regex fix, checkpoint_quality should rise from its artificial floor to reflect each step's actual checklist quality (item count, specificity, actionability per score_checkpoint_quality), and the Learning KPI index should rise correspondingly — this is a pure correction, not a content change, so overall_score per step should only increase or stay flat, never decrease, since no step currently benefits from the broken regex.

Acceptance criteria
  • The shared curriculum quantitative assessment overall_score for every step with an existing :white_check_mark: Checkpoint heading stays flat or improves after the regex fix
  • The cohort-wide Learning KPI index ((2.0 × active_learning + 2.0 × checkpoint_quality + 1.5 × scaffolding) / 5.5) improves measurably once checkpoint_quality is no longer artificially zeroed
  • No existing checklist items, checkpoints, or scaffolding content are touched — this is a scoring-tool fix only, not a workshop content change
  • score_checkpoint_quality() unit tests (new or existing) confirm both the unicode ✅ and :white_check_mark: shortcode forms are detected
Suggested owner

copilot coding agent (small, well-scoped regex fix with an existing test harness in curriculum_assessment.py)
Related to #4247

Generated by 🔬 Workshop Student Simulator · copilot · auto · 246.5 AIC · ⌖ 8.13 AIC · ⊞ 15.1K · ◷

  • expires on Oct 7, 2026, 9:06 AM UTC
Lingua principale
JavaScript
Stelle
52
Fork
26
Merge medio
11h 32m
PR unite (30g)
22

Preparare l'ambiente

Apri in Codespaces

Avvia il container di sviluppo del progetto nel browser, con il tuo account GitHub.

  • Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
  • Nessun modello di pull request
  • Nessuna guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di githubnext/gh-aw-workshop

Tutte le issue di githubnext/gh-aw-workshop

Issue simili

Altre issue su JavaScript

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.