Hacktoberfest 2026: le issue che i maintainer hanno segnato per ottobre, aperte e adatte ai principianti. Sfoglia le issue Hacktoberfest

[Feature]: Compose workflows — run an installed workflow as a step

Aperta
#4,680 8 commenti 1 reazione 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Valutazione

Difficoltà
5/5
Tempo stimato
Più di una settimana
Idoneità per principianti
35/100
Tipo di issue
Funzionalità
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Stato di attività
Attiva
Stack tecnologico
python
Ambito
cli

Direzione di ricerca

Start in the Specify CLI initialization and commands component, locating workflow step registration and the engine.resume entry point. Trace how installed workflow IDs, child runs, outputs, and ancestry are represented; done means all listed acceptance criteria are covered by documentation and tests, including re-entry, cycle rejection, validation, and failure propagation.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

feature-assess feature-needs-clarification triage-can-wait
Problem Statement

Workflows can orchestrate commands but not other workflows. There is no workflow step type and overlays only edit a single base workflow, so a meta-workflow that routes to different workflows must copy their steps or shell out to specify workflow run opaquely.

Proposed Solution

Add a workflow step type that runs an already-installed workflow by ID:

- id: route
  type: if
  condition: "{{ steps.triage.output.stdout | contains('bug') }}"
  then:
    - id: run-bug
      type: workflow
      workflow: bug            # installed workflow id
      input: { spec: "{{ inputs.spec }}" }
  else:
    - id: run-speckit
      type: workflow
      workflow: speckit        # installed workflow id
      input: { spec: "{{ inputs.spec }}" }

Installed IDs only. The step starts the sub-workflow as its own run and exposes typed output:

{ "status": ..., "run_id": ..., "steps": {<child step id>: <child step_result>} }

downstream as {{ steps.run-bug.output.steps.<child_id>.output... }} (scoped under the parent step id, so no collision with other top-level step results).

Re-entry: the child run_id is deterministic — sanitize(f"{parent_run_id}-{effective_step_id}") (the effective id already carries loop/fan-out iteration). On re-execution the step looks up that run: paused/failed → engine.resume(child_run_id); terminal → reuse the persisted result; absent → start it. A sub-workflow that pauses at a gate therefore resumes from its own top-level state, with no duplicate runs even if the parent crashed before recording output.

Cycle safety: each run carries a path-based workflow_ancestry; the step refuses a child already on the path (or exceeding a max depth) and passes ancestry + [current_id] down — diamonds stay legal, only true cycles are blocked. Checked at runtime since target IDs may be expressions.

Alternatives Considered
  • Shell step calling specify workflow run --json — opaque, loses typed output, can't re-enter a paused sub-run.
  • Copying steps / overlays — duplicates logic and drifts.
  • Generic nested-resume via the top-level step index — engine-wide redesign; sidestepped by the deterministic run-id handoff.
Component

Specify CLI (initialization, commands)

AI Agent

Not applicable

Use Cases
  1. Triage/routing meta-workflow dispatching to existing bug vs. speckit workflows.
  2. Reusing a shared sub-workflow across several parent workflows.
Acceptance Criteria
  • workflow step type registered, documented, and tested.
  • Resolves installed IDs only; rejects unknown, path-like, and disabled workflows.
  • input: supports expressions and validates against the target schema.
  • Output {status, run_id, steps} exposed and readable downstream.
  • Deterministic child run_id; paused/failed child resumed via engine.resume; terminal child reused; no duplicate runs after a crash.
  • Path-based cycle detection plus max-depth backstop.
  • Failed/aborted child surfaces as a failed/aborted parent step.
Additional Context

Follow-up to discussion #4647 (maintainer approved).

AI Disclosure

Created with opencode (model: deepseek-v4.1-flash, human-supervised) on behalf of @markuswondrak, based on the AI-assisted draft in discussion #4647.

Lingua principale
Python
Stelle
138k
Fork
12.4k
Merge medio
3g 2h
PR unite (30g)
169

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di github/spec-kit

Tutte le issue di github/spec-kit

Issue simili

Altre issue su Python

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.