Hacktoberfest 2026: le issue che i maintainer hanno segnato per ottobre, aperte e adatte ai principianti. Sfoglia le issue Hacktoberfest

[Feature]: expand expression evaluator filter set (upper, lower, length, split, sort, to_json)

Aperta
#4,614 5 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Valutazione

Difficoltà
4/5
Tempo stimato
3-5 giorni
Idoneità per principianti
52/100
Tipo di issue
Funzionalità
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Stato di attività
Attiva
Stack tecnologico
python
Ambito
tooling

Direzione di ricerca

Start in src/specify_cli/workflows/expressions.py, reading the existing filter registration and _apply_filter() implementation around lines 20-26 and 419-484. Then inspect tests/test_workflows.py and the existing filter tests to understand input and error conventions. The work is done when the agreed filter set is registered, implemented, and covered by tests, including the unresolved length semantics and naming decisions.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

feature-assess feature-needs-clarification triage-can-wait

Problem

The workflow expression evaluator currently supports only 5 filters: default, join, map, contains, and from_json. For a system marketed as "Jinja2-like," common string and collection operations are missing, forcing workflow authors to shell out for basic transformations.

Missing filters that workflow authors frequently need:

  • String operations: upper, lower, trim (whitespace), split (string to list)
  • Collection operations: length, first, last, sort, unique
  • Serialization: to_json (the reverse of existing from_json)

Example of current limitation:

# Cannot do this today — no `length` filter:
- id: check
  type: shell
  config:
    command: "echo 'Found {{ items | length }} files'"

# Cannot do this today — no `split` filter:
- id: list
  type: shell
  config:
    command: "echo '{{ file_list | split(\",\") | length }} files found'"

Proposed Solution

Add a batch of new filters to the expression evaluator, following the existing registration pattern.

String Filters
Filter Input Output Example
upper "hello" "HELLO" {{ name | upper }}
lower "HELLO" "hello" {{ name | lower }}
trim " hi " "hi" {{ name | trim }}
split "a,b,c" ["a","b","c"] {{ csv | split(",") }}
Collection Filters
Filter Input Output Example
length ["a","b"] 2 {{ items | length }}
first ["a","b","c"] "a" {{ items | first }}
last ["a","b","c"] "c" {{ items | last }}
sort [3,1,2] [1,2,3] {{ items | sort }}
unique ["a","a","b"] ["a","b"] {{ items | unique }}
Serialization Filter
Filter Input Output Example
to_json {"key":"val"} "{\"key\":\"val\"}" {{ data | to_json }}

Design Notes

  • Follows existing pattern: Each filter is a standalone function registered in _REGISTERED_FILTERS and dispatched in _apply_filter() (expressions.py lines 20-26, 419-484)
  • Safe by design: All operations are pure transformations — no arbitrary code execution, no side effects, consistent with the sandboxed evaluator model
  • length enables conditionals: Unlocks {% if items | length > 0 %} patterns that currently require shell workarounds
  • split bridges shell output: Shell steps return newline/comma-separated strings; split converts them to lists for downstream processing
  • to_json completes the round-trip: from_json exists; to_json is its natural pair for passing structured data back to shell commands

Affected Files

  • src/specify_cli/workflows/expressions.py — filter registration and implementation (lines 20-26, 419-484)
  • tests/test_workflows.py — unit tests for each new filter

Questions

  1. Are there additional filters you would want in this batch, or should we start with a smaller set?
  2. Should length work on both lists and strings (Jinja2 behavior), or only collections?
  3. Any naming preferences (e.g., len vs length, flatten vs unique)?

Happy to implement if this aligns with your plans for the expression engine.

Lingua principale
Python
Stelle
138k
Fork
12.4k
Merge medio
3g 4h
PR unite (30g)
154

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di github/spec-kit

Tutte le issue di github/spec-kit

Issue simili

Altre issue su Python

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.