Merge queue rebases a fast-forward and re-runs CI above it

Inizia con il flusso gh stack enqueue e REBASE merge-queue, usando la riproduzione numerata per confrontare il parent e il tree prima e dopo il landing. Il lavoro è completato quando un commit il cui parent e tree corrispondono già alla base della queue viene integrato tramite fast-forward, così i livelli superiori mantengono i propri SHAs, i check richiesti non ripartono e rimangono correttamente nella queue.

Summary

The merge queue rebased a commit whose parent was already the queue base. The rebase changed only the SHA: same parent, same tree. GitHub then rewrote the head of the layer above to a commit with an identical tree, which restarted a required 15-minute check. It did not put that layer back in the queue.

A fast-forward would have produced the same history, with no rewrite, no re-run and no second enqueue.

Evidence

Stack main ← #101 ← #102, queue method REBASE, both pull requests approved and green. The SHAs below are relabelled; the parent and tree relationships are verbatim.

The bottom commit needed no rebase. Its parent was the base the queue built against, gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-101-B:

queue base:         B
#101 head:          X    parent B   tree T1
landed on main as:  X'   parent B   tree T1

The new SHA invalidated the layer above. GitHub rewrote its head to a commit with the same tree:

#102 head before:   Y    tree T2
#102 head after:    Y'   tree T2

The queue then stood empty and the required checks restarted:

13:26:16   queue=[#101]   #101 inQ=true pos=1   #102 base=feature/bottom  inQ=false  head=Y
13:26:47   queue=[]       #101 MERGED           #102 base=main            inQ=false  head=Y'

The suite runs three times for one landing: once on #102, once after the rewrite over the same tree, and once in the queue after a manual re-enqueue. The second run cannot reuse the build cache either, because the merge that caused the rewrite also republished a container image the test tasks key on. It pays full price for a tree that was already green.

Expected

When a head's parent is already the queue base, land it as a fast-forward. The SHA then does not change, so no layer above needs a rewrite, a re-run or a second enqueue.

More generally: a rebase that keeps both the parent and the tree changes nothing, and the queue should fast-forward instead.

Actual

Under merge_method: REBASE the queue rewrites every commit, including one that is already a fast-forward. Each layer above pays for the new SHA with a full CI re-run.

Environment

• gh 2.100.0, gh stack v0.0.8
• Trunk ruleset:

  merge_queue:   grouping_strategy HEADGREEN, merge_method REBASE,
                 max_entries_to_build 8, max_entries_to_merge 8,
                 min_entries_to_merge 1, min_entries_to_merge_wait_minutes 5,
                 check_response_timeout_minutes 40
  pull_request:  allowed_merge_methods ["rebase"], required_approving_review_count 1,
                 require_last_push_approval false, dismiss_stale_reviews_on_push false
  

• delete_branch_on_merge: true, allow_auto_merge: false
• A required check that takes about 15 minutes, not a no-op job.

Reproduction

1. Protect a trunk with a REBASE merge queue and a slow required check.
2. Run gh stack link <bottom> <top>. Approve both, and rebase the bottom so its parent is the trunk tip.
3. Press Enqueue stack (2).
4. Compare the landed commit's parent and tree against the bottom pull request's head: same parent, same tree, new SHA. The top pull request's head is rewritten to an identical tree, its required checks restart, and isInMergeQueue stays false.

Related

• #174 — the upper layers leave the queue and are not put back
• #485 — a partial merge leaves a stale stack base, and Rebase stack replays merged commits. Same area, different cause: there the base SHA is stale, here the queue rewrites a commit that needed no rewrite
• #172 — "'Merge stack' appears to enqueue only the bottom PR"
• #498 — the stack cannot be merged from the UI or the CLI
• #503 — the panel described the layer above as queued while it was not, observed in this same run
• #504 — a stacked pull request cannot use auto-merge, so the re-enqueue this forces is manual