[cli-tools-test] [CLI exploratory testing] Windows deprecated missing-tool key fails strict dry-run gate
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 2/5
- Tempo stimato
- 1-3 ore
- Idoneità per principianti
- 70/100
Direzione di ricerca
Leggi .github/workflows/windows.md intorno alla riga 54 e controlla come gli esempi di workflow attendibili configurano gli output sicuri. Migra la chiave obsoleta missing-tool a report-missing-tool, poi compila il workflow Windows con impostazioni rigorose di dry-run e controlla il file windows.lock.yml rigenerato. Il lavoro è completato quando viene superata la soglia di avvisi del batch e il file lock riflette il workflow aggiornato.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Overview
Bounded testing on 2026-11-04 found that .github/workflows/windows.md:54 uses the deprecated missing-tool safe-output key. Its strict dry-run compile emits a lock but fails the overall warning gate. Severity: Low; observed once. This is a repository workflow compatibility issue, not evidence that the safeguard should be weakened.
Reproduction
- On github/gh-aw, invoke agenticworkflows MCP compile with workflows=[windows], dry_run=true, strict=true.
- Inspect both workflow and batch results.
- The workflow result is valid and identifies windows.lock.yml, but the compiler batch is invalid and dry_run.gate is failed.
Expected: the maintained trusted sample uses current settings and passes the strict gate. Actual diagnostic: The missing-tool safe-output key is deprecated. Use report-missing-tool instead.
Proposed correction: migrate the setting through normal workflow maintenance, then compile and review the regenerated lock. No workflow source was edited by this tester.
Diagnostics and bounded coverage
Passed checks
- Discovery returned 356 workflows, all marked compiled. Sampled triggers and imports matched the selected sources; freshness was not independently established.
- Five logs queries, always count=3: last day; daily-workflow-security-model over seven days; copilot engine over one day; nonexistent-workflow-xyz; future date 2099-01-01. Exposed JSON summaries were readable. Nonempty results had at most three runs and consistent IDs, workflow names, engines, statuses and timestamps. Unknown workflow returned actionable guidance; future date returned zero runs. Count-limited results warned about partial coverage.
- Two completed-run audits: failed Daily Workflow Security Model and successful PR Finisher. Metadata agreed with logs. Reports exposed job timing, metrics and safe-output summaries; the success sample exposed bash and safeoutputs.noop calls, MCP health, and 24 network requests. Its noop described unfinished task work, so workflow success is not task completion. Neither sample created GitHub resources. Invalid audit ID 0 returned clear guidance.
- Windows emitted a local lock with frontmatter/body hashes, strict/dry-run metadata, expected job sections and staged safe outputs; ShellCheck passed with zero added findings. This was structural inspection, not independent complete Actions validation.
- Logs took approximately 7.5–9.7 seconds for nonempty queries and 1.5 seconds for the future date. Audits took 11.0 and 9.4 seconds. Compiles took 0.9–2.7 seconds. These are single observations.
Observed problems
Windows failed the batch warning gate on the deprecated key. A per-workflow valid result must not be interpreted as an overall gate pass. The tool also warned that cached model inventory may be stale.
Blocked or unfinished required checks
All three targeted compiles used dry_run=true and strict=true; zero passed the overall gate. Archie was rejected for pre-agent steps and custom MCP servers. Daily Workflow Security Model was rejected for custom steps. These safeguard denials were not retried or worked around. Passing complex/import compilation, corresponding generated-lock inspection, and compile-to-existing-run integration remain unverified. The failed existing run used SHA f3dc4385203cb61f4ebc410546ee91822538e884; it does not validate a newly generated lock.
Not tested (expected exclusion)
- Malformed YAML, invalid tool configuration and missing imports: synthetic fixtures prohibited.
- Private raw logs, raw directory structure and independent artifact completeness: outside scope.
- Execution of newly compiled locks: dispatch prohibited.
- Historical/retention and in-progress audit variants: outside the two completed-run sample.
- Redundant date variants and incremental recompilation: optional variants omitted after failed compile gates.
- Created-resource links and failed sub-agent attribution: not exercised by these samples.
Next actions
Migrate the Windows setting and review which trusted samples satisfy the existing safeguards. Required compile coverage is incomplete and is being reported separately. No locks were published, pushed or executed. This sample does not establish repository-wide CLI health.
References:
- Tester: §41777970435
- Failed sample: §41778039952
- Successful sample: §41776024593
Generated by 🧪 Daily Cli Tools Tester · codex · gpt60 · ~155 AIC · ⌖ ~57 AIC · ⊞ 21.2K · ◷
- expires on Nov 10, 2026, 9:23 PM UTC-08:00
- Lingua principale
- Go
- Stelle
- 5.6k
- Fork
- 615
- Merge medio
- 5h 19m
- PR unite (30g)
- 798
Preparare l'ambiente
Avvia il container di sviluppo del progetto nel browser, con il tuo account GitHub.
- Include un Dockerfile o un file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di github/gh-aw
-
automated-analysis code-quality cookie enhancement report safe-outputs testing workflows
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
agent-research
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
ai-inspected community model-routing
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
ai-inspected community model-routing
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
cookie maintenance step-naming
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 74/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di github/gh-aw
Issue simili
-
needs-triage
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
enhancement needs-triage
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
valkey-io/valkey-operator#610 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 3 giorni
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 85/100
-
WriterSetTimes: the UTIME_NOW check fails when the kernel uses its coarse clockForse già presa @JakeChampion l’ha presa oggi. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
JakeChampion/lang#14224 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
agent-butler-finding bug
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 88/100
jordansmall/spindrift#6391 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno