Fix Cloud Hypervisor regression admission still rejecting all three enclave profiles
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Valutazione
Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.
Descrizione
Source and grouped failures
Follow-up to #11218: run 42302968504, attempt 1, source and workflow revision 35b56fc3f9d298c89ad971386d001133280529ec. This was a manual run of the daily workflow on main, on GitHub-hosted Ubuntu 24.04.
| Failed enclave case | Job |
|---|---|
| Copilot / Cloud Hypervisor | 128200400075 |
| Codex / Cloud Hypervisor | 128200400205 |
| Claude / Cloud Hypervisor | 128200400438 |
Confirmed failure boundary
All three startup.json artifacts now identify the same failure:
{"failureStage":"broker","phase":"pre-broker","reason":"exit","category":"configuration","exitCode":1,"earlyFailure":{"schemaVersion":1,"phase":"backend-selection","reason":"cloud-hypervisor-enclave-admission"}}
The fields above are a compact projection of the retained record. Finalization also records awf-exit/nonzero-exit and awf-cleanup/work-dir-present; gateway cleanup and diagnostic retention succeed. No enclave workload or provider request is established before rejection. All three primary Cloud Hypervisor tests pass.
This revision includes #11192, which closed #11187. Its early diagnostics work: the failure is no longer merely category=unknown. However, changing ordinary-workflow OIDC claim handling has not made the actual production admission path pass. Keep the prior issue closed and track the remaining rejection here.
Investigation boundary and PR scope
The rejection originates in assertCloudHypervisorPreSecurityCompatibility. The daily-regression predicate combines compiled source pins, runner/workflow identity, signed OIDC validation, runtime settings, and exact normalized profile defaults. The emitted reason does not identify which subcondition failed; no registry finding establishes that missing root cause.
One PR should make that rejection safely discriminating, fix the actual mismatch in the real assembled harness configuration/identity path, and handle its pre-start cleanup consequences. Do not guess that OIDC, artifacts, defaults, or KVM is the cause from the aggregate admission code alone.
Acceptance criteria
- Retain a finite, versioned admission-check reason identifying configuration/profile, workflow/source, token acquisition, signature, or claim rejection without publishing tokens, request URLs, headers, raw stderr, or environment dumps.
- Exercise the actual regression configuration through production assembly and admission, with realistic signed ordinary-workflow identity fixtures for all three profiles—not only a hand-built predicate input.
- A correctly pinned hosted daily/manual-main run reaches broker/gateway readiness and performs an approved invocation; malformed/untrusted identity, mismatched source/profile, and reusable-job impersonation still fail closed.
- Preserve artifact attestation, bounded storage, runtime matching, and no-fallback enforcement; do not broaden admission to arbitrary callers to turn the test green.
- Clean up harness-owned pre-start state on rejected admission, or classify explicitly what must be retained for recovery; do not blindly delete unverified recovery state.
These three cases share one pre-engine admission failure and belong in one PR, separate from the Docker native-engine failures.
- Lingua principale
- TypeScript
- Stelle
- 157
- Fork
- 80
- Merge medio
- 4h 43m
- PR unite (30g)
- 412
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di github/gh-aw-firewall
-
agentic-workflows automated dependencies
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
github/gh-aw-firewall#3837 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Wire Codex externally sandboxed execution mode into the real enclave launch pathForse già presa @lpcox l’ha presa oggi. Aperta
github/gh-aw-firewall#11219 · 1 reazione · 2 assegnatari ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Fix Claude Docker enclave immediate native-CLI exit after unattended launch changesForse già presa @lpcox l’ha presa oggi. Aperta
github/gh-aw-firewall#11221 · 1 reazione · 2 assegnatari ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 30/100
github/gh-aw-firewall#11218 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[Duplicate Code] Duplicated SUDO_UID/SUDO_GID operator identity parsing across four modulesForse già presa @lpcox l’ha presa oggi. Apertacode-quality refactoring
github/gh-aw-firewall#11213 · 1 reazione · 2 assegnatari ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di github/gh-aw-firewall
Issue simili
-
Add: ESP 2 ROApertaapproved check:passed streams:add
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 66/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
ipaas: Configure form shows "Deploy to apply." and "Overrides selected Link" when they don't applyForse già presa Una pull request collegata a questa issue è aperta o già unita. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 67/100
wso2/integration-control-plane#1118 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
UTDNebula/utd-notebook#311 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno