[aw] Pelis Agent Factory Advisor: hit engine rate limit (HTTP 429)
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 1-2 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 35/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- github-actions, typescript
Direzione di ricerca
Start with the linked run and the workflow source, .github/workflows/pelis-agent-factory-advisor.md; inspect the failing “Execute GitHub Copilot CLI” step and the invocation_cap_exceeded diagnostics. Determine why the workflow exceeded its LLM invocation cap despite retrying twice, then confirm the targeted fix by checking a subsequent run completes and records terminal safe output.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
What happened
Pelis Agent Factory Advisor hit engine rate limit (HTTP 429).
View run #40412035966 · Workflow source · Previous failures
Branch: main
Next step
Review the failure details below for a targeted fix, or assign this issue to a coding agent to investigate.
Failure details
Runtime evidence
[!WARNING]
Task Could Not Be Completed: The workflow recorded areport_incompletesignal: the task was not completed or completion could not be confirmed.
Error details:
Failure classification: prompt_exhaustion
Driver exit code: 1. The engine driver exited before a terminal safe output was recorded.
Last driver stderr summary: Engine error: Maximum LLM invocations exceeded (invocation_cap_exceeded)
Last tool call status: failed
Failed tool calls observed: 1
Token budget state: unknown (no exhaustion signal recorded)
Step budget state (LLM invocations): exceeded
Safe-output tools: available at gateway snapshot (registered 5 tools)
Safe-output CLI calls observed: unknown (not recorded)
Safe-output MCP calls observed: 0
Safe-output persistence: not recorded
Engine error: Maximum LLM invocations exceeded (invocation_cap_exceeded)
Agent finished without emitting a terminal safe output; task completion could not be confirmed.
Engine HTTP error codes: 429
Last engine error type: invocation_cap_exceeded
Retry attempts observed: 2
A comment or other safe output does not confirm that the requested task was completed. Only inferred runtime status and error codes are reported; agent text is excluded.
Failure Diagnostics
Agent job: agent
Agent job conclusion: failure
Failing step: Execute GitHub Copilot CLI
No additional engine error was captured. Check the reported failure signals and linked run for details.
Only runtime metadata is shown; agent-generated text is excluded.
Copy a debugging prompt
Paste this into your coding agent:
Debug the agentic workflow "pelis-agent-factory-advisor" failure.
Follow https://raw.githubusercontent.com/github/gh-aw/main/debug.md
Failed run: https://github.com/github/gh-aw-firewall/actions/runs/40412035966
If the repository includes the agentic-workflows skill, load it before investigating.
Manage failure notifications
To stop creating failure issues for this workflow, set this in its frontmatter and recompile:
safe-outputs:
report-failure-as-issue: false
This only disables issue reporting; it does not fix the failure.
Generated from Pelis Agent Factory Advisor · copilot · haiku45 · ~8 AIC · ◷
- expires on Nov 2, 2026, 10:40 PM UTC
- Lingua principale
- TypeScript
- Stelle
- 157
- Fork
- 80
- Merge medio
- 3h 25m
- PR unite (30g)
- 441
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di github/gh-aw-firewall
-
agentic-workflows automated dependencies
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
github/gh-aw-firewall#3837 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
agentic-workflows
Difficoltà 4/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 38/100
github/gh-aw-firewall#10743 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
agentic-workflows
Difficoltà 4/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 35/100
github/gh-aw-firewall#10742 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
agentic-workflows
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 35/100
github/gh-aw-firewall#10741 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[awf] api-proxy: Gemini Vertex WIF default OIDC audience and missing project pathForse già presa @lpcox l’ha presa 1 giorno fa. Apertaawf-triage
github/gh-aw-firewall#10711 · 2 commenti · 1 reazione · 2 assegnatari ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di github/gh-aw-firewall
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
vekexasia/pi-extensible-workflows#374 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
documentation good first issue
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 77/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
help wanted linux
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
GiuseppeBellamacina/downtime#19 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
scaleway/ultraviolet#7089 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
Get-Concord-AI/concord-mcp#296 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno