API review and ongoing API quality controls
@stephentoub ci sta già lavorando.
Dal 9/4/2026.
Valutazione
Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.
Descrizione
Meta issue to represent some goals that @stephentoub and I discussed:
- Before GA, we need to do an exhaustive review of all our APIs, including all the codegenerated RPC ones
- We might primarily pick one language as a representative - one that has good tooling for doing API reviews (so, C# then), and go through that end-to-end. For other languages we'd carefully review the most mainstream non-code-generated APIs but not re-do the review for codegenerated RPC.
- The goal here is to identify names, shapes, and patterns that feel wrong or that we might not want to support in the long term
- We know that a pretty large
rpc.*API surface has appeared quickly and it hasn't been consistent about which things are flagged as experimental or not
- Before/beyond that, we want to be more organized about reviewing new RPC APIs that arrive with each runtime update
- Proposal: the automation that updates
@github/copilotand re-runs codegen should also output a cleanly readable list of all API additions/changes. We can ask it to flag breaking changes to non-experimental APIs too, but won't 100% rely on it detecting them. We will review the API changes as part of merging the PR that does a runtime update. This will entail extra effort for the first language we update for each runtime bump, but hopefully will be almost a no-op for subsequent languages.
- Proposal: the automation that updates
- After the big naming change goes in, @stephentoub will look at extending the type metadata in the JSON schema to let us map to more idiomatic types in each language (example: timespans)
- Lingua principale
- Java
- Stelle
- 10.5k
- Fork
- 1.5k
- Merge medio
- 1g 9h
- PR unite (30g)
- 130
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di github/copilot-sdk
-
agentic-workflows
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
github/copilot-sdk#2760 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
github/copilot-sdk#2759 ·
-
documentation
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 85/100
github/copilot-sdk#2758 ·
-
agentic-workflows
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
github/copilot-sdk#2709 · 1 commento ·
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 78/100
github/copilot-sdk#2673 ·
Tutte le issue di github/copilot-sdk
Issue simili
-
documentation
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
inu-appcenter/memorIN-backend#288 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
-
frontend maui-pilot pilot-ask question
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
-
executions.Query — startDate and timeRange filters are sent with inverted comparison operators Apertaarea/plugin
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
kestra-io/plugin-kestra#190 ·