[flame_3d] Object3D.isVisible only checks the center point, so partially visible objects are not drawn
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
@ufrshubham ci sta già lavorando.
Dal 29/10/2026.
Valutazione
Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.
Descrizione
What happened?
The base Object3D.isVisible only checks whether the component's local position is inside the camera's frustum:
bool isVisible(CameraComponent3D camera) {
return camera.frustum.containsVector3(position);
}
Object3D.renderTree calls it to decide whether to draw the component itself whenever its AABB intersects the edge of the frustum. So any Object3D that is partially visible, but whose center is outside of the view, isn't drawn. This happens even when the component isn't nested and reports correct bounds through computeLocalAabb. Being nested makes it worse, since position is then in the parent's space.
MeshComponent and ModelComponent aren't affected because they override isVisible with camera.frustum.intersectsWithAabb3(aabb). Custom Object3D subclasses that don't do the same are affected, for example long walls, floors or anything else that can be partially on screen.
What do you expect?
An Object3D whose AABB intersects the frustum should be drawn, like MeshComponent does.
How can we reproduce this?
- Run the
main.dartbelow withflutter run --enable-flutter-gpu(on Windows also add--enable-impeller). - There are two identical walls going from
z = -30toz = 0, both directly in the world. Their centers (z = -15) are behind the camera, but their front parts are in view. The red one is aMeshComponent, the green one is a customObject3Dwith the samecomputeLocalAabb, but without overridingisVisible. - Only the red wall is rendered.
Nothing is nested, moved or added after the first frame, so this is independent of the other culling issues.
What steps should take to fix this?
Use the world-space AABB in the base implementation, and remove the now identical override from MeshComponent:
bool isVisible(CameraComponent3D camera) {
return camera.frustum.intersectsWithAabb3(aabb);
}
ModelComponent has the same override plus a TODO about animations, so it can keep it for now.
Do have an example of where the bug occurs?
import 'package:flame/game.dart';
import 'package:flame_3d/camera.dart';
import 'package:flame_3d/components.dart';
import 'package:flame_3d/game.dart';
import 'package:flame_3d/graphics.dart';
import 'package:flame_3d/resources.dart';
import 'package:flutter/widgets.dart';
Future<void> main() async {
WidgetsFlutterBinding.ensureInitialized();
await GpuBackend.initialize();
runApp(GameWidget(game: ReproGame()));
}
class ReproGame extends FlameGame3D {
ReproGame()
: super(
camera: CameraComponent3D(
position: Vector3(0, 2, -6),
target: Vector3(0, 1, 0),
),
);
@override
Future<void> onLoad() async {
// Two identical walls going from z = -30 to z = 0. Their centers
// (z = -15) are behind the camera, but their front parts are in view.
world.addAll([
// Red: MeshComponent. Rendered.
MeshComponent(
mesh: _wallMesh(const Color(0xFFFF0000)),
position: Vector3(1.5, 0.5, -15),
),
// Green: custom Object3D with the same bounds. Not rendered.
CustomMesh(
mesh: _wallMesh(const Color(0xFF00FF00)),
position: Vector3(-1.5, 0.5, -15),
),
]);
}
Mesh _wallMesh(Color color) => CuboidMesh(
size: Vector3(1, 1, 30),
material: UnlitMaterial(albedoColor: color),
);
}
/// An [Object3D] that draws a mesh and reports its bounds, but does not
/// override `isVisible`.
class CustomMesh extends Object3D {
CustomMesh({required this.mesh, super.position});
final Mesh mesh;
@override
Aabb3? computeLocalAabb() => mesh.aabb;
@override
void draw(covariant RenderContext3D context) {
context
..model.setFrom(worldTransformMatrix)
..drawMesh(mesh);
}
}
Relevant log output
No errors or warnings are logged.
Execute in a terminal and put output into the code block below
Flutter 3.47.8 • channel stable • https://github.com/flutter/flutter.git
Framework • revision 737ba8f885 (6 days ago) • 2026-10-22 21:37:31 -0700
Engine • hash dfd2e6cb7d319db05e3bf1503f3e2ac60f6288a2 (revision cf636b1dfb) (6 days ago) • 2026-10-23 02:13:38.000Z
Tools • Dart 3.13.7 • DevTools 2.60.0
Affected platforms
All
Other information
Reproduced on Windows (Impeller with the OpenGL ES backend), but the culling logic is platform independent.
Closely related to #4165: for a nested Object3D without computeLocalAabb, both are needed for it to be culled correctly, since this fix relies on the AABB being at the world position. Other culling issues found at the same time: #4163 and #4164.
Are you interested in working on a PR for this?
- I want to work on this
- Lingua principale
- Dart
- Stelle
- 10.8k
- Fork
- 1.1k
- Merge medio
- 1g 14h
- PR unite (30g)
- 62
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di flame-engine/flame
-
[flame_3d] Nested Object3D without computeLocalAabb is culled using its local positionForse già presa @ufrshubham l’ha presa 1 giorno fa. Apertabug flame_3d
flame-engine/flame#4165 · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[flame_3d] Children added to an Object3D after it was rendered can be culled while on screenForse già presa @ufrshubham l’ha presa 1 giorno fa. Apertabug flame_3d
flame-engine/flame#4164 · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[flame_3d] Nested components are culled at their old position after an ancestor movesForse già presa @ufrshubham l’ha presa 1 giorno fa. Apertabug flame_3d
flame-engine/flame#4163 · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 35/100
flame-engine/flame#4157 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 3/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 45/100
flame-engine/flame#4150 · 1 reazione ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di flame-engine/flame
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
aaronified/fluenough#918 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
TButton 小尺寸时文字在垂直方向不居中,有点偏下Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
Tencent/tdesign-flutter#1233 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 92/100
fossasia/badgemagic-app#2025 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 5 giorni
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 4 giorni