RTDB: updateChildren() creating a new child raises no local events at locations observed only by filtered queries — silent, and dependent on invisible cache state
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Idoneità per principianti
- 48/100
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia da firebase-database/core/view/ViewProcessor.java, tracciando applyUserOverwrite attraverso WriteTreeCompleteChildSource.getCompleteChild e il percorso della cache SyncTree/SyncPoint/View descritto nell’issue. Confronta il comportamento corrispondente di firebase-js-sdk ViewProcessor.ts ed esegui o aggiungi la coverage per la riproduzione filtrata di orderByKey updateChildren, il relativo controllo setValue e il controllo loadsAllData. Il lavoro è completato quando il comportamento locale previsto di child_added è coperto e il comportamento scelto, indicizzato per chiave, conservativo o di errore esplicito, è coerente.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Summary
When a user write creates a child implicitly — updateChildren() at the
child path, or setValue() below it — under a location observed only by
filtered queries (e.g. orderByKey().startAt(...)), no local child_added
is ever raised. The write is persisted, syncs to the server normally, and
listeners eventually receive it as server echo — so while online the loss
is invisible (~50 ms latency instead of ~1 ms), and offline the app appears
frozen despite writing correctly.
setValue() at the child raises normally in the identical state. And the
behavior flips if an unfiltered (loadsAllData) listener has ever completed a
sync at the location this session — or is seeded complete from persisted
tracked-query records of a previous session — making the observable local
semantics of an identical write depend on invisible cache lineage.
The same logic exists verbatim in firebase-js-sdk, and we reproduced the
behavior empirically on the iOS SDK (macOS) as well — it appears inherited
from the common ancestral implementation.
Root cause (line-anchored, main branch)
ViewProcessor.applyUserOverwrite (firebase-database
core/view/ViewProcessor.java):
- For
changePathdeeper than one level (childChangePathnon-empty — the
implicit-creation case), the new child must be synthesized:
Node childNode = source.getCompleteChild(childKey)(~line 377). WriteTreeCompleteChildSource.getCompleteChild(~704–721) can only
succeed via (a) the event cache containing the child — never true for a
new key on a filtered view, sinceCacheNode.isCompleteForChildis
(fullyInitialized && !filtered) || hasChild(key); (b) the
optCompleteServerCacheargument; or (c)
WriteTree.calcCompleteChild(~336–349) passing the same
isCompleteForChildtest against the filtered server cache — also false
for a new key.optCompleteServerCachecomes from
SyncTree.applyOperationHelper(~1044) →
SyncPoint.getCompleteServerCache(emptyPath)→
View.getCompleteServerCache(~99–110), which with an empty path returns
non-null only for aquery.loadsAllData()view with a fully
initialized server cache. A location with only bounded listeners can never
supply it.- With
getCompleteChild == null:newChild = EmptyNode.Empty()(~389,
comment "There is no complete child node available"), then
!oldChild.equals(newChild)(~392) compares Empty to Empty for the
brand-new key → treated as no change →newViewCache = oldViewCache
(~405). No event, no warning, nothing.
setValue() at the child takes the childChangePath.isEmpty() branch
(~373–375, newChild = changedSnap) and never consults the gate — which is
why it works.
firebase-js-sdk ViewProcessor.ts (viewProcessorApplyUserOverwrite)
contains the identical structure: getCompleteChild null →
ChildrenNode.EMPTY_NODE → equals skip.
Why this is a bug and not acceptable conservatism
- Silent contract violation. The documented behavior — local writes fire
events on local listeners immediately, before server acknowledgment — is
violated with no error, no log, no documented carve-out. - Semantics depend on invisible cache lineage. The same write at the
same location raises or doesn't depending on whether some other listener
(loadsAllData) ever completed a sync there this session, or left a
persisted tracked-query completeness record in a previous session. No
application developer can reason about this from the API surface. No
specification would choose "same write, same listener, different result
depending on how the cache got here." - The conservatism is provably unnecessary for key-indexed queries. For
orderByKeyranges, window membership is decidable from the key alone —
no old value is needed to know achild_addedis due. Applying the merge
overEmptyNodefor a key the filter accepts (or at minimum for
key-indexed filters) would be correct where the current code is silent.
(For value-indexed windows the old value genuinely matters, and a
conservative path is defensible — but it should not be silent.)
Reproduction (no network manipulation needed)
Persistence enabled. Fresh app data (important: no persisted loadsAllData
completeness records for the path).
- Attach
ref(L).orderByKey().startAt("x")with aChildEventListener;
never attach an unfiltered listener atLin the app's lifetime. - Let the initial sync complete (online).
goOffline()(offline only makes the loss observable; the local event
is equally absent online, masked by server echo).ref(L).child("x_new").updateChildren({"v": 1}).- Expected: local
child_addedforx_new. Actual: nothing until
reconnect (server echo). - Controls, same state:
ref(L).child("x_new2").setValue(1)→ fires;
attaching an unfiltered listener atL, letting it sync, then repeating
step 4 → fires (the cache-lineage flip).
Evidence from our app (verbose native logging)
Deaf (bounded-only location):
RepoOperation: update: /teams/.../events/2026-08/1788115390730_A3..._0
DataOperation: update: ... {us=222}
Persistence: Persisted user merge in 1ms
Persistence: Transaction completed. Elapsed: 3ms
(no "Updated tracked query keys", no EventRaiser output)
Identical state, setValue at the child:
Persistence: Persisted user merge in 0ms
Persistence: Updated tracked query keys (1 added, 0 removed) for tracked query id 4256
EventRaiser: Raising 1 event(s)
EventRaiser: Raising /teams/.../events/2026-08: CHILD_ADDED: { 1788121988664_FF..._0: 1 }
Environment / impact
- flutterfire firebase_database 12.4.1 and 12.0.4 (pre/post Pigeon —
identical; native SDK behavior), Android 14/15; reproduced on macOS via the
iOS SDK. - Impact: our offline-first sports-timing console wrote every live event with
updateChildrenunder boundedorderByKeylisteners; during venue Wi-Fi
outages (events still arriving over BLE) the operator display froze
entirely while data was written and synced correctly — discovered only
after a two-month-old release because server echo masks the loss whenever
online. - Workaround we shipped:
setValue()at the child. Also effective:
maintaining anyloadsAllDatalistener at the location (with its cost).
Ask
Either raise the event when the filter can decide membership without the old
value (key-indexed case at minimum), or fail loudly / document prominently
that updateChildren under exclusively-filtered listeners does not raise
local events.
- Lingua principale
- Java
- Stelle
- 2.6k
- Fork
- 733
- Merge medio
- 2g 15h
- PR unite (30g)
- 72
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di firebase/firebase-android-sdk
-
api: remoteconfig
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
firebase/firebase-android-sdk#8827 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Crashlytics plugin writes build ID lists in directory listing order, so APKs can differ between machinesForse già presa @mrober l’ha presa 8 giorni fa. Apertaapi: crashlytics
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
firebase/firebase-android-sdk#8789 · 1 commento · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
api: auth
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
firebase/firebase-android-sdk#8505 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 15/100
firebase/firebase-android-sdk#8835 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 25/100
firebase/firebase-android-sdk#8832 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di firebase/firebase-android-sdk
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
NationalSecurityAgency/ghidra#10220 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 80/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
RIS export splits an organization name containing “and” into multiple authorsForse già presa @Gautam-aman l’ha presa oggi. Apertastatus: needs-triage
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
JabRef/jabref#17821 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
FailureContext.java rounds down thresholds in lastedAtLeast()Forse già presa Una pull request collegata a questa issue è aperta o già unita. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno