A per-context command allowlist can be bypassed with `--use-context` (no way to lock an agent to its context)
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Idoneità per principianti
- 35/100
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- node.js, typescript
Direzione di ricerca
Start by tracing how the CLI parses --use-context and --config-file, selects the current context, and enforces commands.allowed; the issue does not name specific files or tests. Compare the parsed-argument path with the bypass examples, then check what existing test coverage exercises context selection and policy enforcement. Done means context switching and config-file overrides are rejected before requests when a lock is enabled, with a structured error.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Summary
A context's commands.allowed list only applies while that context is active. Any caller can switch to another context in the same config file by passing --use-context <name>, or can point at a different file with --config-file. A context with no allowlist has no restrictions, so switching to it removes the restrictions.
So the allowlist can't restrict an agent that is allowed to run elastic. A config file commonly holds both a restricted agent context and an unrestricted admin context (the pattern that --save-as admin produces). An agent that runs elastic --use-context=admin ... gets full admin access, and the CLI gives no indication that it left the restricted context.
Why this matters for agents
The typical setup for letting an AI agent use the CLI is:
- Layer 1 (Elasticsearch): give the
agentcontext a read-only API key. - Layer 2 (CLI): attach a
commands.allowedlist to theagentcontext and make it the current context. - Layer 3 (agent harness): allow the agent to run only
elastic ..., and add deny rules for--use-contextand--config-file.
Layer 3 is there only to stop the agent from escaping layer 2. But harness deny rules match the command's text, and the CLI accepts many spellings of the same flag. Using Claude Code with --allowedTools "Bash(elastic *)" and --disallowedTools "Bash(elastic * --use-context *)" "Bash(elastic * --config-file *)":
| Command the agent runs | Harness result | CLI result |
|---|---|---|
elastic <cmd> --use-context admin |
denied | n/a |
elastic <cmd> --use-context=admin |
allowed | runs as admin |
elastic --use-context admin <cmd> |
allowed | runs as admin |
elastic --config-file=/other.yml <cmd> |
allowed | runs against the other file |
elastic <cmd> --use-cont''ext=admin (shell quote-splitting) |
allowed | runs as admin |
Wider patterns such as Bash(elastic *--use-context*) catch the first three but not the quote-splitting form. No text pattern can cover every way a shell can spell a flag. The CLI has the parsed arguments, so it is the only layer that can enforce this reliably.
How the quote-splitting row was checked: Claude Code's permission check allowed elastic status --json --use-cont''ext=nope under the wider deny pattern. The original pattern can't match it either, because it needs the literal text --use-context with spaces on both sides. And the CLI answered Context "nope" not found, so it had parsed the flag as --use-context. Against the reproduction config below, the same form switches to admin (see the last two commands under "Actual result"). In later runs where the target context was admin, the model itself declined to run the obfuscated command, saying it looked like an attempt to evade a deny rule. That refusal is the model's judgement, not an enforced control, so a prompt-injected or differently configured agent can't be relied on to make it.
Steps to reproduce
No cluster is needed. The unreachable URL shows whether the request got past the allowlist: command_blocked means the allowlist stopped it, and connection_error means the CLI tried to send it.
-
Create
repro.yml:current_context: agent contexts: agent: elasticsearch: url: http://127.0.0.1:9 auth: api_key: read-only-key commands: allowed: - status - stack.es.search admin: elasticsearch: url: http://127.0.0.1:9 auth: api_key: admin-key -
Run:
chmod 600 repro.yml export ELASTIC_CLI_CONFIG_FILE=$PWD/repro.yml elastic es indices delete --index products --yes --json elastic es indices delete --index products --yes --json --use-context admin elastic es indices delete --index products --yes --json --use-context=admin elastic --use-context admin es indices delete --index products --yes --json elastic status --json --use-cont''ext=admin elastic es indices delete --index products --yes --json --use-cont''ext=admin
Actual result
$ elastic es indices delete --index products --yes --json
{"error":{"code":"command_blocked","message":"command \"stack.es.indices.delete\" is not allowed by the current policy"}}
$ elastic es indices delete --index products --yes --json --use-context admin
{"error":{"code":"connection_error","message":"fetch failed"}}
$ elastic es indices delete --index products --yes --json --use-context=admin
{"error":{"code":"connection_error","message":"fetch failed"}}
$ elastic --use-context admin es indices delete --index products --yes --json
{"error":{"code":"connection_error","message":"fetch failed"}}
$ elastic status --json --use-cont''ext=admin
{"context":"admin","services":{"elasticsearch":{"ok":false,"url":"http://127.0.0.1:9","error":"network error: fetch failed"}}}
$ elastic es indices delete --index products --yes --json --use-cont''ext=admin
{"error":{"code":"connection_error","message":"fetch failed"}}
The first call is blocked as expected. All the others get past the allowlist: the CLI tries to send the delete as admin (the status call confirms that the active context is admin), and against a real cluster it would succeed. --config-file=<other file> behaves the same way.
Expected result
A config file should be able to lock callers to the current context, so that the allowlist can't be escaped from the command line. With the lock on, every --use-context / --config-file call above should fail with command_blocked (or a similar structured error) before any request is sent.
Possible approaches
Any of these would solve it. The first is probably the simplest:
- Context lock in the config file. For example, a root-level or per-context setting like
allow_context_override: false. When the current context sets it, the CLI rejects--use-contextand--config-file(in any spelling) with a structured error. - The allowlist covers context switching. Treat switching contexts as a command that the current context's
commands.allowedmust permit. With no entry, you can't leave the context. - A lock environment variable. For example,
ELASTIC_CLI_LOCKED_CONTEXT=agent, set by whatever launches the agent. The CLI then refuses to run as any other context. This also coversELASTIC_CLI_CONFIG_FILEbeing overridden inside the agent's shell, as long as the harness doesn't let the agent change its environment.
Workarounds considered
- Root-level
commands.allowed: a context's list replaces the root list, and the root list would also restrictadmin, which the operator needs. - Separate config files for admin and agent: the agent can still use
--config-file=<admin file>if it can guess or find the path. - Harness deny rules: they match text, so they can be bypassed (see the table above).
Environment
- Elastic CLI: 0.5.0 (
elastic version --json) - Node.js: v22.22.3
- OS: Linux 7.0.0
- Agent harness used for the bypass table: Claude Code 2.1.284
- Lingua principale
- TypeScript
- Stelle
- 45
- Fork
- 26
- Merge medio
- 1g 16h
- PR unite (30g)
- 71
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di elastic/cli
-
enhancement
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 88/100
elastic/cli#628 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug: malformed JSON passed to --document (and other body object flags) silently passes validationApertabug
Difficoltà 3/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 74/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 3/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 58/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 88/100
callstackincubator/rozenite#518 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Area/Workflow Priority/Blocker Type/Bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
wso2/product-integrator#2622 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
-
area:bash bug has repro platform:macos
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
anthropics/claude-code#98644 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
allure-framework/allure-js#1603 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno