Skip the `FSharpType.IsUnion` check when a quotation node for an instance member is built
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 3 giorni
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 3/5
- Tempo stimato
- 1-2 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 57/100
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- fsharp
- Ambito
- performance
Direzione di ricerca
Start by reading checkObj and the instance member builders named in the issue, then inspect how RebuildShapeCombination reaches them. The proposed change is to check whether the receiver type is assignable to the declaring type before running the union type lookup. Verify that existing accepted and rejected receiver cases remain the same and compare instance member construction benchmarks with the static case.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Building a quotation node for an instance property, field or method takes 5 µs, a hundred times what the node for a static member takes. Every transformation through ExprShape pays that for each such node, because RebuildShapeCombination runs the same check as Expr.PropertyGet and Expr.Call.
type Person = { Name : string; Age : int; City : string }
type Clock () =
static member Zone = "UTC"
[<MemoryDiagnoser>]
type InstanceMember () =
let p = Var ("p", typeof<Person>)
let q = Var ("q", typeof<Person>)
let person = Expr.Var p
let age = typeof<Person>.GetProperty "Age"
let zone = typeof<Clock>.GetProperty "Zone"
let predicate =
<@@ (%%person : Person).Age >= 18 && (%%person : Person).City = "Kyiv" && (%%person : Person).Name <> "" @@>
let rec renameByShape (expr : Expr) : Expr =
match expr with
| ShapeVar v -> if v = p then Expr.Var q else expr
| ShapeLambda (v, body) -> Expr.Lambda (v, renameByShape body)
| ShapeCombination (shape, parts) -> RebuildShapeCombination (shape, List.map renameByShape parts)
[<Benchmark>]
member _.StaticProperty () = Expr.PropertyGet zone
[<Benchmark>]
member _.InstanceProperty () = Expr.PropertyGet (person, age)
[<Benchmark>]
member _.IsUnion () = FSharpType.IsUnion typeof<Person>
[<Benchmark>]
member _.RenameByShape () = renameByShape predicate
[<Benchmark>]
member _.RenameBySubstitute () = predicate.Substitute (fun v -> if v = p then Some (Expr.Var q) else None)
| Method | Mean | Allocated |
|---|---|---|
| StaticProperty | 0.05 µs | 104 B |
| InstanceProperty | 5.2 µs | 1216 B |
| IsUnion | 5.1 µs | 1080 B |
| RenameByShape | 20.1 µs | 7824 B |
| RenameBySubstitute | 0.8 µs | 2264 B |
BenchmarkDotNet 0.15.8, .NET 10.0.12, FSharp.Core 10.1.401, Windows 11 x64. The machine was not idle: standard deviations are up to 10 percent, the allocations are exact. A property of a class, an instance method call and RebuildShapeCombination of one such node measure like InstanceProperty.
Where it goes, as far as I read the code at a274432:
-
mkInstancePropGet,mkInstancePropSet,mkInstanceFieldGet,mkInstanceFieldSet,mkInstanceMethodCallandmkInstanceMethodCallWcallcheckObj, andRebuildShapeCombinationcalls them. -
checkObjfirst asksFSharpType.IsUnionabout the declaring type, for the case that the member belongs to the nested class of a union case:let rec loop (ty: Type) = if FSharpType.IsUnion ty && FSharpType.IsUnion ty.BaseType then loop ty.BaseType else ty let declType = loop membInfo.DeclaringType if not (assignableFrom declType (typeOf obj)) then invalidArg "obj" (SR.GetString(SR.QincorrectInstanceType)) -
FSharpType.IsUnionreadsCompilationMappingAttributethroughGetCustomAttributesand keeps nothing; for a record type that is four reads in one call (isExceptionRepr,isConstructorReprfor the type and its base type,isUnionType). -
Expr.Substitutebuilds nodes without the check, hence the last row.
Describe the solution you'd like
Test the common case first: when the receiver's type is assignable to the declaring type, the node is valid and nothing else has to be asked.
let checkObj (membInfo: MemberInfo) (obj: Expr) =
let objType = typeOf obj
if not (assignableFrom membInfo.DeclaringType objType) then
// as today: find the union type, test again, raise
It accepts and rejects what the current code does: loop gives the declaring type or a base type of it, and a receiver assignable to a type is assignable to its base types. I have not built FSharp.Core with it; from the table, an instance member node should then cost about what a static one costs. I can send a pull request.
Describe alternatives you've considered
- Keeping the answer of
FSharpType.IsUnionper type. It helps every caller ofFSharp.Reflection, but adds a cache for the life of the process where the change above removes the question. - In my code:
Expr.Substitutewhere a rewrite only replaces variables. A rewrite that replaces any other node still rebuilds every node above it.
Additional context
Found while measuring a quotation normalizer (pipes, let and [<ReflectedDefinition>] calls rewritten away) for fsprojects/FSharp.Azure.Cosmos: inlining a function with five member accesses took about 57 µs through ExprShape and 22 µs once the parameters were replaced with Expr.Substitute.
- Lingua principale
- F#
- Stelle
- 4.3k
- Fork
- 880
- Merge medio
- 3g 21h
- PR unite (30g)
- 109
Preparare l'ambiente
Avvia il container di sviluppo del progetto nel browser, con il tuo account GitHub.
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di dotnet/fsharp
-
Semantic classification cache for opened documents is never populated (written to the unopened-documents cache)Forse già presa @xperiandri l’ha presa 39 giorni fa. ApertaNeeds-Triage
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 90/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 3 giorni
-
Needs-Triage
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
dotnet/fsharp#20265 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 3 giorni
-
Bug Needs-Triage
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 3 giorni
-
Area-VS Bug Needs-Triage
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 5/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 3 giorni
-
Feature Request
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 35/100
dotnet/fsharp#20764 · 2 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 3 giorni
Tutte le issue di dotnet/fsharp
Issue simili
-
enhancement
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 60/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Re-importing a cached module re-reads its files once per import path (very slow on Windows / in the LSP)Forse già presa @bfren l’ha presa oggi. Apertastatus:needs-triage
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
nushell/nushell#19226 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 72/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
type/automation type/performance
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Permissioned transactions fetch each entity once per tx-step, producing huge permission-check queriesForse già presa @verveguy l’ha presa 1 giorno fa. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 74/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno