Raft upgrade compatibility: member rejoining, WAL page sizes and legacy HTTP headers
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Idoneità per principianti
- 25/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- csharp
- Ambito
- api, databases, distributed-systems
Direzione di ricerca
Start with the focused upstream HTTP cluster test and the existing downstream membership test for the rejoin failure. Then inspect the WAL fixture and test referenced in PR #403, along with MoveToStandbyState, the Leader setter, UnfreezeAsync, and legacy HTTP header handling. Done means regression coverage passes for member rejoining, old and new WAL page sizes, and absent legacy headers while malformed present values remain rejected.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Two blockers encountered while validating a 6.6.0 → 6.7.2 Raft upgrade
@sakno
Downstream tracking: https://github.com/SlimPlanet/SlimFaas/issues/402. Tested on macOS ARM64 (.NET SDK 10.0.300, 16 KiB system pages), with three real Raft nodes and with focused tests against develop (f10ace6).
1. A removed live member cannot rejoin
Create a three-node HTTP Raft cluster, remove one live follower, append another entry, and add the follower again. Catch-up applies the removal before the node receives the re-addition. Subsequent AppendEntries returns HTTP 500 / QuorumUnreachableException, and the follower does not apply the re-addition.
MoveToStandbyState(resumable: false) faults the election task. The Leader setter subsequently accesses that completed task's Result without checking success. In addition, UnfreezeAsync short-circuits on the previously completed readiness probe, and the old leadership task remains faulted.
The existing downstream membership test passes on 6.6.0 and fails repeatedly on 6.7.2. A focused upstream HTTP cluster test reproduces the failure without downstream application code.
2. Existing WAL metadata pages are interpreted using a different size
WAL metadata pages created with 6.6.0 have a 4096-byte layout. Newer constructors use max(4096, Environment.SystemPageSize), which is 16384 on this host. After correctly restoring the snapshot, reopening the compacted WAL fails with:
WriteAheadLog.InternalException: WAL page 0 doesn't exist on the disk
WriteAheadLog.MetadataPageManager.GetView
WriteAheadLog.ApplyAsync
WriteAheadLog.InitializeAsync
A rolling upgrade fails at its first follower; all 180 synthetic sets were verified on every node before upgrading. The same saved snapshot/WAL restores successfully with 6.6.0. The fixture and test are in https://github.com/SlimPlanet/SlimFaas/pull/403.
The persisted page size needs to survive reopening, including logs already created with the newer larger-page layout. Invalid/mixed page sizes should fail before files are opened or resized. Private-memory buffers also need an alignment compatible with legacy pages smaller than the OS page size.
A proposed fix and tests are being prepared against develop. No causal link to the original downstream staging incident is claimed.
Additional rolling-upgrade blocker: HTTP headers
After correcting WAL restoration, the next real 6.6.0 → 6.7.2 native rolling-upgrade attempt fails because X-Raft-State-Version is required on incoming requests. Legacy nodes have no state version header (implicit version zero). Conversely, a new leader requires X-Raft-Last-Index on AppendEntries responses, which older followers do not emit. Both absent headers need legacy-compatible defaults while keeping malformed present values rejected. Three regression cases fail before this compatibility fix. Tracked with the other fixes in #300.
- Lingua principale
- C#
- Stelle
- 2k
- Fork
- 159
- Metriche di merge delle PR
- Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g
Preparare l'ambiente
Avvia il container di sviluppo del progetto nel browser, con il tuo account GitHub.
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di dotnet/dotNext
-
Lib:Threading question wontfix
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 45/100
Tutte le issue di dotnet/dotNext
Issue simili
-
documentation
Difficoltà 1/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 62/100
-
bug misleading tooling trivial
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Docs example projects pinned to a literal library version instead of 3.*Forse già presa @DaveSkender l’ha presa oggi. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
facioquo/stock-indicators-dotnet#2372 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[Docs] officecli-docx SKILL.md still describes `\n` as a soft line break after #262Forse già presa @giprime l’ha presa oggi. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 62/100
Facepunch/sbox-public#12097 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni