Add a skill to interpret Android runtime events in .nettrace files
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Idoneità per principianti
- 35/100
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- csharp
- Ambito
- devtools, observability-sre
Direzione di ricerca
Start by locating the repository’s skill conventions and reading the runtime’s documented event schema; use the issue’s session-local TraceEvent decoder example and original .nettrace files as investigation references. Done means a repository skill can answer focused lifetime and GC-bridge queries while explaining event loss, missing data, and uncertainty, without adding a permanent trace-reader project or product dependency.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Android framework version
net11.0-android (Preview)
Affected platform version
.NET 11 Android runtime diagnostics, covering CoreCLR and NativeAOT.
Description
Add a repository skill that accepts a local .nettrace file and interprets our custom Microsoft.Android.Runtime events. This is a follow-up to #6822 and the local experiment moving JNI global/local/weak-global reference diagnostics to EventSource.
The skill should provide cross-platform investigation on Windows, macOS, and Linux without adding a permanent trace-reader project or dependency to the Android solution/product. A small session-local decoder using Microsoft.Diagnostics.Tracing.TraceEvent is one possible implementation detail.
Suggested coverage:
- Decode event names, IDs, timestamps, keywords, levels, and typed payloads; correlate GC bridge/type-map timing with reference operations.
- Track creation, deletion, ownership release, and Java GC collection of global/local/weak-global references. Distinguish local-reference ownership release from actual JNI deletion.
- Correlate numeric handles with Java identity hashes, managed peer/type diagnostics, managed thread IDs, and bridge-operation context. Account for handle reuse and concurrent counter snapshots rather than treating the trace as one atomic history.
- Display CoreCLR EventPipe call stacks and interpret the opt-in NativeAOT
ReferenceStackTracepayloads, correlated by reference event ID, handle, and managed thread ID. - Report event loss, late attachment, abrupt-crash truncation, missing events/stacks, and uncertainty explicitly. Absence of an event is not proof an operation did not happen.
- Allow focused queries such as “what happened to handle 0x75?”, “where was this peer disposed?”, and “what happened during this GC bridge round?”.
dotnet-trace report and its Speedscope/Chromium conversions do not expose the custom event payloads needed for these investigations. Preserve and interpret the original .nettrace file.
Steps to Reproduce
- Build an Android application with
EnableDiagnostics=trueandEventSourceSupport=true; use startup suspension when a complete initial reference history is needed. - Collect global/weak-global events using
dotnet-trace collect --dsrouter android-emu --providers Microsoft.Android.Runtime:0x10:5 -o references.nettrace, or use0x30to include local references. - For NativeAOT managed stack payloads, additionally enable keyword
0x40(0x50for globals/weak-globals plus stacks;0x70to include locals). - Ask the proposed skill to analyze the original trace, identify relevant lifetimes, and explain the evidence and collection limitations.
The new reference event IDs/keywords above describe the current local experiment, not a shipped contract. The skill should follow the runtime's documented event schema as it evolves.
Did you find any workaround?
A small prototype reader was validated against real CoreCLR and NativeAOT Android emulator traces. It is being removed from the repository/solution; the following example preserves the useful decoding approach for future skill development.
Example: session-local TraceEvent decoder
Use a console project referencing Microsoft.Diagnostics.Tracing.TraceEvent (the experiment used version 3.1.21). This is an example, not a request to add a permanent tool project.
using System;
using System.Globalization;
using System.IO;
using Microsoft.Diagnostics.Tracing.Etlx;
if (args.Length != 1) {
Console.Error.WriteLine("Usage: decoder TRACE.nettrace");
return 2;
}
string convertedPath = Path.Combine (
Path.GetTempPath (), $"android-trace-{Guid.NewGuid ():N}.etlx");
try {
TraceLog.CreateFromEventPipeDataFile (args [0], convertedPath);
using var trace = new TraceLog (convertedPath);
if (trace.EventsLost != 0) {
Console.Error.WriteLine (
$"WARNING: {trace.EventsLost} events were lost; histories are incomplete.");
}
Console.Error.WriteLine (
"Operations before collection and final events at abrupt exit may be missing.");
int eventCount = 0;
foreach (var entry in trace.Events) {
if (entry.ProviderName != "Microsoft.Android.Runtime") {
continue;
}
eventCount++;
Console.Write (string.Create (CultureInfo.InvariantCulture,
$"{entry.TimeStampRelativeMSec:F3}ms thread={entry.ThreadID} {entry.EventName}"));
for (int i = 0; i < entry.PayloadNames.Length; i++) {
string name = entry.PayloadNames [i];
object value = entry.PayloadValue (i);
Console.Write ($" {name}=");
if (value is ulong handle &&
(name == "handle" || name == "sourceHandle")) {
Console.Write (string.Create (
CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, $"0x{handle:x}"));
} else {
Console.Write (Convert.ToString (value, CultureInfo.InvariantCulture));
}
}
Console.WriteLine ();
for (var stack = entry.CallStack (); stack != null; stack = stack.Caller) {
Console.WriteLine ($" at {stack.CodeAddress.FullMethodName}");
}
}
if (eventCount == 0) {
Console.Error.WriteLine ("No Microsoft.Android.Runtime events found.");
return 1;
}
return trace.EventsLost == 0 ? 0 : 1;
} finally {
if (File.Exists (convertedPath)) {
File.Delete (convertedPath);
}
}
This prints raw evidence. The skill still needs schema-aware interpretation and correlation, especially when traces are partial. NativeAOT stack strings are event payloads, not CallStack() entries.
Relevant log output
The local experiment decoded ordinary JNI reference events, peer diagnostics, local-reference releases, and Java GC collection on both runtimes. CoreCLR provided application call stacks through EventPipe. NativeAOT provided no EventPipe call stacks; the opt-in fallback produced 148 correlated managed stack events containing application frames. Ordinary NativeAOT collection with keyword mask 0x30 emitted no stack-string events.
By opening the issue you agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct.
- Lingua principale
- C#
- Stelle
- 2.1k
- Fork
- 579
- Merge medio
- 2g 3h
- PR unite (30g)
- 216
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Nessuna guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di dotnet/android
-
Area: App+Library Build
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Area: Mono.Android
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
dotnet/android#9192 · 4 commenti · 1 reazione ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
needs-triage
Difficoltà 4/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 45/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Investigate JNI reference ownership leaks and GC-bridge leak-check reliabilityForse già presa Una pull request collegata a questa issue è aperta o già unita. Apertaneeds-triage
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 50/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[skill-runner] Weekly scanApertaautomated needs-triage skill-runner
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 38/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di dotnet/android
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
activescott/lessmsi#306 ·
-
Python: Bug: split_plaintext_paragraph / split_markdown_paragraph can return a chunk larger than max_tokensForse già presa @xThreeh l’ha presa oggi. Apertapython triage
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
microsoft/semantic-kernel#14566 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 4 giorni
-
triage
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 82/100
rjmurillo/moq.analyzers#1384 ·
-
Variables passed to Compensated are not set on the routing slipForse di nuovo libera Una pull request per questa issue è stata chiusa senza essere unita. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
MassTransit/MassTransit#6249 ·
-
security
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
Sendspin/sendspin-dotnet#339 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno