.dockerignore matching ignores filename case on Linux
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 4 giorni
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 2/5
- Tempo stimato
- 1-3 ore
- Idoneità per principianti
- 82/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Specificata chiaramente
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- docker, python
- Ambito
- build-system
Direzione di ricerca
Parti da docker.utils.tar e dal codice di pattern matching che invoca (docker/utils/build.py, gli helper exclude) per capire perché README.md corrisponde anche a readme.md su Linux mentre BuildKit lo conserva. Lo script reproduce-case.py dell'issue fornisce un modo per verificare il comportamento senza daemon; adattalo come test accanto ai test build/tar esistenti in tests/unit/utils_test.py. Completato significa esclusione case-sensitive su Linux, con il reproducer che mostra che readme.md viene conservato.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
🤖 this issue description was generated by an LLM. i reviewed it before submitting. 🤖
I used Codex for the investigation, reproduction scripts, and this draft.
When I generate a build context with docker.utils.tar, the pattern README.md removes both README.md and readme.md on Linux. Docker's BuildKit keeps readme.md with the same input. The SDK therefore removes a file that the Dockerfile could otherwise copy.
Reproduction
Save this script as reproduce-case.py:
import tarfile
from pathlib import Path
from tempfile import TemporaryDirectory
import docker
from docker.utils import tar
patterns = ['README.md']
files = ['README.md', 'readme.md']
with TemporaryDirectory() as directory:
root = Path(directory)
(root / 'Dockerfile').write_text('FROM scratch\nCOPY . /\n')
(root / '.dockerignore').write_text('\n'.join(patterns) + '\n')
for relative in files:
path = root / relative
path.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
path.write_text(relative)
with tar(str(root), exclude=patterns.copy()) as context:
with tarfile.open(fileobj=context) as archive:
actual = sorted(name for name in archive.getnames() if name in files)
print('docker:', docker.__version__)
print('patterns:', patterns)
print('SDK context files:', actual)
I ran it in an isolated uv environment, using commit 56343ddf8f0c44281e151c2dad016c16cdb8393d:
uv run --isolated --no-project --no-config --no-cache \
--python /home/jyn/.local/share/mise/installs/python/3.14.7/bin/python3 \
--with 'docker @ git+https://github.com/docker/docker-py@56343ddf8f0c44281e151c2dad016c16cdb8393d' \
python reproduce-case.py
The --python path selects my tested Python installation; use the path to your Python executable on another machine. The pinned requirement selects the upstream SDK rather than an installed copy. I did not modify the SDK or replace its modules with mocks. This reproducer creates disposable files and examines the SDK's context tar without contacting a Docker daemon.
Expected behavior
The SDK should exclude README.md and retain readme.md on Linux. I built the same two files with FROM scratch and COPY . / using BuildKit, and its local output retained readme.md.
Actual output
docker: 7.2.1.dev26+g56343ddf8
patterns: ['README.md']
SDK context files: []
BuildKit control
I ran the following standalone control with Docker's active lima context and lima builder. It creates the same input files, runs docker buildx build with a local filesystem export, and enumerates every exported regular file before removing the temporary directories. The command uses the active Docker context and builder; another machine can use its own working configuration.
Buildx command and exported-file inspection
Save this script as buildkit-control-case.py:
import subprocess
from pathlib import Path
from tempfile import TemporaryDirectory
patterns = ['README.md']
files = ['README.md', 'readme.md']
with TemporaryDirectory() as directory:
context = Path(directory) / 'input'
context.mkdir()
output = Path(directory) / 'output'
(context / 'Dockerfile').write_text('FROM scratch\nCOPY . /\n')
(context / '.dockerignore').write_text('\n'.join(patterns) + '\n')
for relative in files:
path = context / relative
path.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
path.write_text(relative)
subprocess.run([
'docker', 'buildx', 'build',
'--progress=plain', '--provenance=false',
'--output', f'type=local,dest={output}', str(context),
], check=True)
print('BuildKit output files:', sorted(
path.relative_to(output).as_posix()
for path in output.rglob('*') if path.is_file()
))
Run it with:
python3 buildkit-control-case.py
I got this stdout; Buildx wrote its progress log to stderr and exited successfully:
BuildKit output files: ['.dockerignore', 'Dockerfile', 'readme.md']
Environment
- Docker SDK for Python:
7.2.1.dev26+g56343ddf8, using upstream commit56343ddf8f0c44281e151c2dad016c16cdb8393d. - Python:
3.14.7 (main, Sep 29 2026, 15:01:40) [Clang 22.1.3 ]. - OS/distribution: CachyOS Linux, rolling release (
BUILD_ID=rolling;/etc/os-releasedoes not defineVERSION_ID). - Kernel/platform:
Linux-7.2.9-1-cachyos-x86_64-with-glibc2.44. - Docker CLI:
29.8.2; Docker Engine:29.8.0(linux/amd64). - Buildx:
github.com/docker/buildx 0.37.2 2d379c0c3f22da0d2759d132a0ec81ca949098f0. - The SDK tar reproducer requires no engine connection; the separate BuildKit comparison used the versions above.
- Lingua principale
- Python
- Stelle
- 7.2k
- Fork
- 1.7k
- Merge medio
- 3g 19h
- PR unite (30g)
- 1
Preparare l'ambiente
- Include un Dockerfile o un file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di docker/docker-py
-
Add `pull` to the list of kwargs to pass to create and runForse già presa @zainnadeem786 l’ha presa 129 giorni fa. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
docker/docker-py#3369 · 2 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 4 giorni
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 68/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 4 giorni
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
docker/docker-py#2457 · 4 reazioni ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 4 giorni
-
Difficoltà 3/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 74/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 4 giorni
-
Difficoltà 3/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 80/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 4 giorni
Tutte le issue di docker/docker-py
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 92/100
-
Harmony OPeNDAP SubSetter (HOSS) Geographic LARC_CLOUD PREFIRE_SAT2_AUX-SAT R01 production
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
nasa/harmony-autotester#245 ·
-
[FEATURE] - Add UTVD supportApertaenhancement
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
Deltares/imod-python#1928 ·
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 88/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
feature
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 66/100