Hacktoberfest 2026: le issue che i maintainer hanno segnato per ottobre, aperte e adatte ai principianti. Sfoglia le issue Hacktoberfest

feat(review): specialized multi-agent review with parallel agentic workflow

Aperta
#63 2 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Valutazione

Difficoltà
5/5
Tempo stimato
Più di una settimana
Idoneità per principianti
35/100
Tipo di issue
Funzionalità
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Stato di attività
Tranquilla
Stack tecnologico
java
Ambito
ai, backend

Direzione di ricerca

Start by reading the existing PrReviewer, FindingDeduplicator, and FindingVerifier implementations and the project’s Quarkus native build configuration. Then check whether the configured model provider supports tool calling and review the quarkus-langchain4j-agentic module’s native compatibility. Done means parallel specialized reviews are merged and deduplicated, verified by the existing verifier, and validated in the native build.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

enhancement help wanted java
Problem Statement

The bot runs a single review pass (PrReviewer) plus a second-pass verifier. One prompt must cover correctness, security, regressions, comment consistency, and code quality at once, which dilutes focus and makes any single dimension hard to tune or extend. Specialized agents — each focused on one concern, running in parallel and merged — would improve depth and let each concern evolve independently.

Proposed Solution

Adopt the quarkus-langchain4j-agentic module and run specialized review agents (e.g. correctness, security, regression, code-quality/consistency, test-coverage) as a parallel agentic workflow, then merge and dedupe their findings (reuse FindingDeduplicator) and pass the result through the existing verifier (FindingVerifier).

  • Agents can be given @Tool methods (e.g. fetch a related file, look up a symbol) to deepen context — pairs with #55 (codebase-aware context).
  • Account for the added token cost via the per-PR spend cap (#42); allow cheaper concerns to use cheaper models via risk-based routing (#43).
  • Validate the agentic module in the GraalVM native build, and confirm the configured provider supports tool/function calling (tool use is model-dependent).
Alternatives Considered
  • Single combined prompt + verifier (current) — cheapest, but one prompt juggling all concerns limits depth and tunability.
  • Sequential agents — simpler orchestration, but higher latency than running concerns in parallel.
Priority

Important

Code of Conduct
  • I have searched for existing issues and this is not a duplicate.
Lingua principale
Java
Stelle
35
Fork
7
Merge medio
9h 23m
PR unite (30g)
154

Preparare l'ambiente

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di devops-thiago/ThrillhouseBot

Tutte le issue di devops-thiago/ThrillhouseBot

Issue simili

Altre issue su Java

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.