Proposal: branch protection ruleset + review/merge process for `main`
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 35/100
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- github
- Ambito
- devops
Direzione di ricerca
Start by reviewing the proposed main branch ruleset changes and the .github/CODEOWNERS expansion referenced in Issue #848. Resolve the open questions about existing individual permissions and team access, and get confirmation from @NSoiffer before enabling changes. Done means the proposal is approved and the agreed ruleset and team structure are in place.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Following up on our Oct 5 call about PR approvals, here's a written proposal for the process and the GitHub configuration to support it.
Current state: there's an existing active ruleset on main, but it only blocks branch deletion and force-pushes. Nothing yet requires PRs, reviews, or restricts who can merge.
Proposed process for getting changes into main:
- Draft a PR into
mainand confirm the status checks pass - Submit the PR
- An appropriate Code Owner reviews and approves
- Once approved, any member of the MathCAT-Maintainers team merges into
main
Proposed CODEOWNERS expansion (Issue #848):
.github/CODEOWNERS is a file that maps parts of the repo (by directory or path) to specific people or teams. On its own, it's just documentation. But once "Require review from Code Owners" is turned on in the main branch ruleset, GitHub will use this mapping to automatically:
- request the right reviewer(s) for each PR, based on which files it touches
- block merging until one of them approves.
For example, a PR touching /Rules/Languages/ would need approval from the translators team, while a PR touching /src/ would need Neil's approval.
Proposed ruleset additions for main:
- Require a pull request before merging, with required approvals and require review from Code Owners (scopes review to the right people per file path, via CODEOWNERS)
- Require status checks to pass, and require branches to be up to date before merging
- Require conversation resolution before merging
- Squash merge only
Proposed team structure:
| Team | Purpose | Recommended access |
|---|---|---|
| Full admin control (settings, rulesets, team management) | admin on all 5 MathCAT repos |
|
| MathCAT-Maintainers | Regular hands-on contributors — review, merge via PR, day-to-day maintenance | write on all 5 MathCAT repos |
| MathCAT-Translators | Language/localization contributors | read on MathCAT repo |
Open items:
- Should existing individually-granted permissions on MathCAT be reconciled into the new team structure (i.e., migrate people onto the team and remove the standalone grants), or left as-is alongside it?
- Are we comfortable updating the
MathCAT-AdminMathCAT-Repo-Admins, MathCAT-Maintainers, and MathCAT-Translators team access to align with this proposal? - Review and confirm this whole proposal with @NSoiffer before any ruleset changes are turned on.
Please feel free to share any comments, questions, or proposed revisions!
@aimalz @moritz-gross @Johannes-spsm @MartheGjelstad @GeorgeKerscher @Jeffrey-Kuan
- Lingua principale
- Rust
- Stelle
- 130
- Fork
- 96
- Merge medio
- 1g 1h
- PR unite (30g)
- 84
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di daisy/MathCAT
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 88/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
daisy/MathCAT#946 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
discussion
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
discussion translation
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
daisy/MathCAT#675 · 4 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di daisy/MathCAT
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 88/100
software-mansion/pathfinder#3620 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 88/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug priority: low
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 90/100
storytold/wordcraft#6211 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
backlog multiple issues priority: low
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
storytold/pdfcraft#6911 · 2 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
DGNIMPORT: "The DGN model has nothing that can be imported" when the first element streams are emptyAperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
HakanSeven12/OpenCADStudio#2820 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno