[Dev] One source of truth per problem, and the equality of the modelings checked by computation
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
@ocots ci sta già lavorando.
Dal 6/11/2026.
Valutazione
Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.
Descrizione
Written by Claude (Claude Code) at the request of ocots, from a design discussion with ocots.
Goal
Each problem should have one source of truth for what is shared between modelings, and an automatic check for what is written more than once. Today a problem is written once per modeling (OptimalControl @def, its scalarized variant, JuMP), plus its metadata. Nothing checks that the dynamics, costs and constraints of two modelings are the same function. #371 compares NLPs, which happens after discretization and mixes the formulation with the transcription.
What we know
- Declarative data (parameters, bounds, initial guess, reference values, names) can be shared directly: #377 (shared initial guess), #379 (declared fields), #376 (features computed from the model).
ProblemData(ext/JuMPModels/schemes/data.jl, #368, #369) already describes a problem by continuous functions(x, u, v, t), with no discretization in it. These functions are generic Julia code. They can be called with numbers, JuMP variables or symbolic variables, so the same data could feed a ModelingToolkit modeling (#308).- The
@defmodels stay hand-written. They are the showcase of OptimalControl, and two independent writings make a better oracle than one generated from the other. - Exa is the only reason OptimalControl needs
@def. The Exa model is generated from the syntax by CTParser (build_examodel). A model built from functions with the functional API of CTModels has no Exa builder. control-toolbox/CTDirect.jl#673 removes this limit: the components get a traceable form, and one transcription in CTDirect serves every modeler.
Proposal (to be discussed)
- Shared declarative data: one source per problem, read by every modeling (#377, #379).
- Equality of the functions, by computation: for every problem available in both OptimalControl and JuMP, evaluate the dynamics, the Lagrange and Mayer costs, and the path and boundary constraints of the
@defmodel and ofProblemDataat random points, and require equality. This checks the formulation before any discretization, without a hand-written list. Differences that are wanted (scaling withstate_expressions, component names) must be recognised by computation and reported. - ModelingToolkit (optional): build the MTK modeling from
ProblemDatainstead of writing it by hand (#308). - Target, after control-toolbox/CTDirect.jl#673: a
ProblemDatacould become a CTModelsModelwith its traceable form, hence solvable with Exa without@def. Its transcription by CTDirect would then be compared with the hand-written JuMP transcription (schemes/build.jl), which stays an independent oracle.
Related
#257, #284, #308, #371, #376, #377, #379; control-toolbox/CTDirect.jl#673 and control-toolbox/CTDirect.jl#674.
How to work on this theme
This is a theme issue: it describes the work to do and what is known so far, it is not meant to be closed by a single PR.
- Whoever takes it first defines the work precisely and splits it into sub-issues (they can live in any repository of the organization).
- Work proceeds through the sub-issues; tick the checklist below as they are closed.
- Close the theme when everything is done or explicitly dropped.
Sub-issues
- to be created when the theme is taken
- Lingua principale
- Julia
- Stelle
- 13
- Fork
- 1
- Merge medio
- 3h 24m
- PR unite (30g)
- 34
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di control-toolbox/OptimalControlProblems.jl
-
[Cron] cron-failureApertacron-failure
Difficoltà 4/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 25/100
control-toolbox/OptimalControlProblems.jl#381 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[Metadata] Declared fields: tags, references, Corleone, reference solutionForse già presa @ocots l’ha presa 1 giorno fa. Aperta
control-toolbox/OptimalControlProblems.jl#379 · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[Metadata] Shared initial guess in the metadata, read by every modelingForse già presa @ocots l’ha presa 1 giorno fa. Aperta
control-toolbox/OptimalControlProblems.jl#377 · 1 commento · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[Dev] Precompile the problems so that users and tests do not recompile them every timeForse già presa @ocots l’ha presa 1 giorno fa. Aperta
control-toolbox/OptimalControlProblems.jl#373 · 1 commento · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[Tests] NLP equivalence tests between JuMP, ADNLP and ExaForse già presa @ocots l’ha presa 1 giorno fa. Apertapaper
control-toolbox/OptimalControlProblems.jl#371 · 1 commento · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di control-toolbox/OptimalControlProblems.jl
Issue simili
-
Add project: Typst_jll.jlForse già presa @github-actions l’ha presa oggi. Apertaadd-project
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 76/100
YDX-2147483647/best-of-typst#590 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 74/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 74/100
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 67/100
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100