flake: TestTasksCreate (multiple variants)
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 2/5
- Tempo stimato
- 1-3 ore
- Idoneità per principianti
- 72/100
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia in coderd/aitasks_test.go, in TestTasksCreate, soprattutto con il setup e le chiamate a CreateTask intorno alle righe 1719-2130. Esegui go test ./coderd -run '^TestTasksCreate$' -count=100, idealmente su Windows o con contention aggiunta, e verifica che tutte le varianti completino l'esecuzione senza errori di context deadline, mentre le asserzioni esistenti continuano a passare.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
CI failure
- CI run: https://github.com/coder/coder/actions/runs/30976975074
- Failing job: https://github.com/coder/coder/actions/runs/30976975074/job/92212913393 (
test-go-pg (windows-2022)) - Failure date: 2026-08-05 05:15 UTC; job completed at 05:21 UTC, before the 05:29 Slack alert
- Run attempt: 1
- Commit:
7a4ae2649eb592b961c142caf43dbe064a15a308 - Commit author: Jake Howell
The complete 4,462-line Windows job log was available and reviewed. The macOS matrix job was canceled only after this Windows job failed; this is not a matrix-cancellation artifact.
Failure evidence
Seven TestTasksCreate variants failed at the same API call with the same expired request context:
=== FAIL: coderd TestTasksCreate/TaskTableCreatedAndLinked (17.07s)
aitasks_test.go:1968:
Post "http://127.0.0.1:52750/api/v2/tasks/me": context deadline exceeded
=== FAIL: coderd TestTasksCreate/OK (17.13s)
aitasks_test.go:1751:
Post "http://127.0.0.1:52230/api/v2/tasks/me": context deadline exceeded
=== FAIL: coderd TestTasksCreate/MultipleTasksForSameUser (17.08s)
aitasks_test.go:2060:
Post "http://127.0.0.1:52756/api/v2/tasks/me": context deadline exceeded
=== FAIL: coderd TestTasksCreate/FailsOnInvalidTemplate (17.07s)
aitasks_test.go:1936:
expected: *codersdk.Error
in chain: Post "http://127.0.0.1:52831/api/v2/tasks/me": context deadline exceeded
=== FAIL: coderd TestTasksCreate/TaskWithCustomName (17.08s)
aitasks_test.go:2026:
Post "http://127.0.0.1:52697/api/v2/tasks/me": context deadline exceeded
=== FAIL: coderd TestTasksCreate/TaskLinkedToCorrectTemplateVersion (17.13s)
aitasks_test.go:2122:
Post "http://127.0.0.1:52747/api/v2/tasks/me": context deadline exceeded
=== FAIL: coderd TestTasksCreate/FailsOnNonTaskTemplate (17.26s)
aitasks_test.go:1906:
expected: *codersdk.Error
in chain: Post "http://127.0.0.1:52830/api/v2/tasks/me": context deadline exceeded
All template-version build jobs completed successfully immediately before the failing CreateTask requests. This is one synchronized test-family timeout, not seven independent product failures.
Root cause assessment
Classification: flaky test / timing-dependent deadline exhaustion on Windows.
Each failing subtest creates a 10-second context at the beginning of the test body:
ctx := testutil.Context(t, testutil.WaitShort) // WaitShort = 10s
It then performs expensive setup with that deadline already ticking:
- starts an in-process coderd and provisioner daemon;
- creates/logs in the first user;
- uploads a template version;
- waits for the provisioner import job;
- creates a template;
- only then calls
client.CreateTask(ctx, ...).
Under full-suite Windows load, setup consumed essentially the entire 10-second budget. The seven parallel variants consequently reached POST /api/v2/tasks/me with expired or nearly expired contexts and failed together after roughly 17.1 seconds of reported subtest time. Server logs show setup and template imports succeeding; there is no database outage or product panic.
A deterministic fix is to create a fresh request context immediately before CreateTask (and fresh contexts for later assertions), or use WaitLong for end-to-end variants whose setup is intentionally included in the deadline. The context should not be started before server/template setup.
Race, panic, OOM, and resource checks
The full job log contains no WARNING: DATA RACE, race detected during execution of test, panic/runtime-error trace, OOM, killed process, allocation failure, disk exhaustion, or file-descriptor exhaustion indicator. This was a normal assertion failure, not a process crash.
Assignment analysis
Ownership/history targets:
git blame -L 1719,2130 coderd/aitasks_test.go
git log --oneline -10 --follow coderd/aitasks_test.go
The most recent non-trivial modifier of TestTasksCreate itself is 30112075 (feat: add display name field for tasks, PR coder/coder#20856) by ssncferreira. That change substantially expanded the CustomNames portion of this exact function and retained the same early WaitShort context pattern. Later file changes either modify separate task tests or unrelated areas.
Assigning ssncferreira based on the failing test-function history, not the author of the CI commit.
Duplicate search
Searched open and closed coder/internal issues, including issues closed in the last 30 days, for:
TestTasksCreate,TasksCreate, and individual failing variants;api/v2/tasks/me+context deadline exceeded;aitasks_test.go, Windows task timeouts, andWaitShort;- database/timing errors, process crashes, panic/OOM/unknown failures, and race signatures.
No issue describes this exact test family and deadline-exhaustion mode.
Related but not duplicate:
- https://github.com/coder/internal/issues/1561 — CLI golden tests with broad slow-CI context deadlines, different package/test and setup path.
- https://github.com/coder/internal/issues/1600 — race-detector fallout involving
TestTasks/UpdateInput, different test and root cause. - https://github.com/coder/internal/issues/1320 — old
TestTasksrace-job report without thisTestTasksCreatesignature.
Reproduction
Most likely on Windows under full-suite parallel load:
go test ./coderd -run '^TestTasksCreate$' -count=100
To amplify locally, add delay or CPU/DB contention before CreateTask; the current context begins before all server and template setup.
- Lingua principale
- Nessun dato sulla lingua
- Stelle
- 3
- Fork
- 0
- Metriche di merge delle PR
- Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g
Guida per i contributori
Nessuna guida per i contributori indicizzata per questo repository
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di coder/internal
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 45/100
-
flake
-
flake
-
flake
Tutte le issue di coder/internal
Issue simili
-
area:spec bug good first issue ready-for-agent
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
-
low smart-contract Stellar Wave testing
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
Web3Novalabs/Nevo#1376 · 3 commenti ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 60/100
github/gh-aw-mcpg#13748 ·