Cleanup: identify and fix users affected by the id_token email-claim regression
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 30/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Specificata chiaramente
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Ambito
- authentication, database
Direzione di ricerca
Start by reading the issue's described fallback in lib/omniauth/strategies/codebar.rb and the listed cleanup queries; run the scans only after codebar/auth#83 is deployed. Keep emails and auth IDs in private ops notes, reporting counts and member IDs in the issue. Done means affected records are safely merged or re-keyed, members 31450 and 31452 are gone, no matching garbage records remain, and a magic-link sign-in resolves to the correct member.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
The fix in codebar/auth#87 (PR codebar/auth#83) makes every id_token carry the user-record email and name claims. After it merges and deploys, the data damage from the regression still needs cleanup.
While the regression was live (auth release v64, 2026-10-02 10:01-16:34 UTC), a magic-link sign-in produced an id_token without an email claim. The codebar OmniAuth strategy fell back to sub (email = payload['email'] || payload['sub'] in lib/omniauth/strategies/codebar.rb) and created a planner member whose email and name were the better-auth user id: an empty account with no subscriptions or roles. Two such members are known: 31450 and 31452. Their users were dropped into the new-member flow as if they had never signed up. The rollback (v65) restored correct behaviour immediately: member 17284 has confirmed that sign-in works normally again. The window is therefore closed at 2026-10-02 16:34 UTC, and what remains is data cleanup.
1. Identify any affected users
- Find planner members whose
emailis a better-auth user id: members created in the window whoseemailmatches a 32-character opaque id, or whoseemailequals an auth user id directly. - Cross-check
auth_servicerows with providercodebarcreated in the window: a row whoseuidhas that same 32-character shape points at a garbage member. detect_duplicate_membersdoes not find these: the garbage member's email and name share nothing with the real member. Use the queries above, not the duplicate detector.- Keep the resulting user list out of this issue (emails and ids go in the private ops notes); report only counts and member ids here. Expected result: exactly 31450 and 31452 — earlier dump scans found no members of this shape before v64. The scan's real job is to confirm that and to catch anything the users created while stuck in the new-member flow.
2. Fix the identified users
For each affected user:
- If a real member exists (the usual case): merge anything the garbage member picked up (the user may have completed the new-member flow) into the real member, then delete the garbage member and its
auth_servicerow. 17284 is confirmed already: their real member is intact and in use, so only the garbage member (31452) goes. - If no real member exists (a genuinely new user who signed up during the window): re-key the member to the user's real email and name instead of deleting it.
- Confirm the user's next magic-link sign-in resolves to the same member. GitHub sign-ins already resolve via
github_idand are unaffected.
Verification before closing
- One magic-link sign-in resolves the real member on the fixed build (1.7.7 + explicit claims — different code path from the rollback that 17284 confirmed; member 17284 is the known case).
- No member has an email equal to a better-auth user id, and no
auth_servicerow has acodebaruid of that shape. - Members 31450 and 31452 are gone.
Timing: run this after codebar/auth#83 is deployed. Sign-ins after the fix can no longer create members of this shape.
- Lingua principale
- Ruby
- Stelle
- 105
- Fork
- 206
- Merge medio
- 1g 3h
- PR unite (30g)
- 74
Preparare l'ambiente
- Include un Dockerfile o un file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di codebar/planner
-
DashboardQuery eager-loads workshop_host with :sponsors in one join (same host-loss trap as #2975)Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
enhancement
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 3/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 45/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 42/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di codebar/planner
Issue simili
-
area: cli enhancement
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
mail processing verified
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 88/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 7 giorni
-
L: github:actions L: php:composer
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 88/100
dependabot/dependabot-core#16493 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper-openid_connect#409 · 1 commento ·
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 64/100
puppetlabs/pdk-templates#676 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno