Windows: OMO helper node processes accumulate far beyond active conversation count
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 45/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- node.js, typescript
- Ambito
- cli, devtools, operating-systems
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia riproducendo l’accumulo di processi Windows con Get-CimInstance Win32_Process, quindi leggi components/codegraph/src/hook.ts, components/bootstrap/src/hook.ts e i percorsi di spawning di components/lsp-daemon/. Confronta il numero di helper tra sessioni sequenziali e verifica che il teardown o il riutilizzo mantengano i conteggi entro limiti, mentre CodeGraph, git-bash-mcp e lsp-daemon continuano a funzionare nelle conversazioni attive.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Summary
On Windows, OMO helper Node processes accumulate far beyond the number of active conversations when running Codex Desktop with the bundled OMO plugin. With only 3 active conversations, I observed 27 repeated helper bundles (codegraph, git-bash-mcp, lsp-daemon) still resident for hours, causing heavy memory usage and UI lag.
Environment
- LazyCodex / OMO plugin version:
sisyphuslabs/omo 4.19.0from the local Codex plugin cache - Codex version:
codex-cli 0.145.0 - OS: Windows
- Install method: Codex Desktop with marketplace/plugin cache under
C:\Users\Rusz\.codex\plugins\cache\sisyphuslabs\omo\4.19.0 - Relevant config: OMO enabled; only 3 active conversations during observation
Repository Decision
- Target repository:
code-yeongyu/lazycodex - Why this belongs there: the repeated helper trees originate from OMO plugin components, not only from generic Codex processes.
- LazyCodex evidence (runtime + local installed source):
- Repeated command lines all point into
C:\Users\Rusz\.codex\plugins\cache\sisyphuslabs\omo\4.19.0\... - Observed repeats:
27 x components/codegraph/dist/serve.js27 x components/git-bash-mcp/dist/cli.js mcp27 x components/lsp-daemon/dist/cli.js mcp27 x codegraph npm-shim27 x codegraph-win32-x64 ... serve --mcp
components/codegraph/src/hook.tsspawns a detached background worker on every eligibleSessionStart.components/bootstrap/src/hook.tsalso spawns a detached background worker.components/lsp-daemon/dist/ensure-daemon.js/dist/cli.jsspawn a detached daemon process.
- Repeated command lines all point into
- Upstream Codex evidence:
openai/codexalready has similar Windows MCP leak issues open, including #28361, #30408, #31499, #32797, #34614, #34704.- That suggests a nearby ownership boundary, but this specific helper bundle is OMO-owned because the repeated commands and paths are all under the OMO plugin cache.
Reproduction
- Run Codex Desktop on Windows with the bundled OMO plugin enabled.
- Open and use a few conversations over time. In my case there were only 3 active conversations.
- Inspect running processes in Task Manager or with
Get-CimInstance Win32_Process. - Group by command line and observe repeated OMO helper bundles remaining resident long after the conversations that likely spawned them.
Expected Behavior
Helper processes should be shared where possible and should be reaped when the owning conversation or session ends. Process count should stay roughly proportional to active work.
Actual Behavior
Helper bundles accumulate over time and remain resident well beyond the active conversation count. The machine becomes noticeably laggy, and dozens of node.exe processes remain alive.
Evidence
- Runtime grouping from
Get-CimInstance Win32_Process | Group-Object CommandLine:27 x codegraph/dist/serve.js27 x git-bash-mcp/dist/cli.js mcp27 x lsp-daemon/dist/cli.js mcp
- Old roots still resident:
opencode.exe pid=25024started2026-07-25 16:16:43opencode.exe pid=35736started2026-07-25 16:18:43
- Codex root also retained many historical children under
codex.exe pid=22096, with child start times spanning2026-07-24 23:55to2026-07-25 17:42 - Repeated helper chain shape:
node.exe codegraph/dist/serve.jsnpm-shim.js serve --mcpcodegraph-win32-x64 ... serve --mcpwatchdog node.exe -e "..."- sibling
git-bash-mcp - sibling
lsp-daemon
- Listener footprint was small, which suggests these are mostly lingering stdio/helper workers rather than legitimate long-lived listening services:
- only one obvious node listener was observed:
127.0.0.1:19825fromopencli daemon.js
- only one obvious node listener was observed:
Root Cause
The strongest current evidence is a lifecycle gap in OMO-managed helper processes on Windows:
components/codegraph/src/hook.tsusesspawn(..., { detached: true, stdio: "ignore" })pluschild.unref()for theSessionStartworker.components/bootstrap/src/hook.tsdoes the same for bootstrap work.lsp-daemonalso uses detached daemon spawning.
That pattern is valid for background work, but with only 3 active conversations it should not leave 27 repeated helper bundles alive for hours. The observed process trees suggest one of these is happening:
- helper trees are not being reaped after the owning session ends
- helper suites are started per historical session instead of being reused/shared
- Windows termination does not reach the full helper subtree consistently
Proposed Fix
- Audit helper lifecycle ownership for:
components/codegraph/src/hook.tscomponents/bootstrap/src/hook.tscomponents/lsp-daemon/*
- Add explicit ownership and teardown for Windows helper trees, instead of relying on detached background workers to disappear naturally.
- Consider a shared process model for
git-bash-mcp,lsp-daemon, and CodeGraph MCP helpers so they are reused across sessions instead of spawned per session. - Add regression coverage that opens multiple sessions sequentially and asserts helper count remains bounded after session close.
Verification Plan
- Reproduce on Windows with 3 active conversations and record helper counts by command line before the fix.
- Apply the lifecycle fix and repeat the same workflow.
- Confirm that historical helper bundles are reaped after session end or reused instead of duplicated.
- Confirm that CodeGraph,
git-bash-mcp, andlsp-daemonstill function normally in active conversations.
This issue or PR was generated by LazyCodex.
Tag: lazycodex-generated
- Lingua principale
- TypeScript
- Stelle
- 3.8k
- Fork
- 246
- Metriche di merge delle PR
- Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g
Preparare l'ambiente
Questo progetto non fornisce container di sviluppo, Dockerfile né guida per i contributori, quindi l'ambiente è a tuo carico: parti dal suo README e consulta la nostra guida al primo contributo per i passaggi generali.
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di code-yeongyu/lazycodex
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
code-yeongyu/lazycodex#170 ·
-
Fix Codex browser QA routing before standalone PlaywrightForse già presa @berkshirehathaways l’ha presa 84 giorni fa. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 72/100
code-yeongyu/lazycodex#148 ·
-
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 35/100
code-yeongyu/lazycodex#172 ·
-
[5.0.0-beta.78] High cost and rapid quota consumption: use role-appropriate agent model defaultsAperta
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 48/100
code-yeongyu/lazycodex#166 ·
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 35/100
code-yeongyu/lazycodex#163 ·
Tutte le issue di code-yeongyu/lazycodex
Issue simili
-
freshness freshness:observed-only
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
thoroc/context-radar#282 ·
-
bug P2 rust
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
area: web
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 85/100
gabe-santana/arkdraw#25 ·
-
bug require-triage
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
expressjs/expressjs.com#2549 · 1 reazione ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug good first issue hacktoberfest
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 88/100
codercops/discord-bot#101 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno