Re-implement and enhance `check-formatting.yml` Github Actions workflow as a Node script
@miorel ci sta già lavorando.
Dal 17/8/2024.
Valutazione
Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.
Descrizione
The workflow introduced in #225 is currently powered by a shell command, namely yarn format && git status --porcelain piped through some not very easy to maintain inline Perl.
Let's rewrite this as a Node script that's more maintainable. This is also an opportunity to address the other TODO in the workflow file, and have it output a summary as described at https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-commands-for-github-actions#adding-a-job-summary
The general behavior of the workflow should be:
- Run
yarn formatto rewrite any files that are not correctly formatted. This part can still happen outside Node, so for example the command we run becomes something likeyarn format && node some-script.js. - The script basically replaces the
git status --porcelainpart and the subsequent Perl expression it's piped into. The script should therefore still rungit status --porcelainfrom within Node and capture the output. - For each line in the output of
git status --porcelain, the script should remove the first 3 characters (see explanation of the format at https://git-scm.com/docs/git-status#_porcelain_format_version_1 to understand why) to get only the filename. It should then output an error message (using the format described at https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-commands-for-github-actions#setting-an-error-message) to indicate that the file in question doesn't respect the repository's formatting rules. - For bonus points (this part can be done as a separate PR) output a markdown summary at the end.
- If there were any files that were improperly formatted, the script should exit with a non-zero exit code so that the check fails and draws the attention of the author and reviewers.
- Lingua principale
- TypeScript
- Stelle
- 20
- Fork
- 12
- Metriche di merge delle PR
- Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di code-chronicles-code/leetcode-curriculum
-
enhancement kotlin
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
-
good first issue tests
Difficoltà 1/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
-
Add tests for `swap` utility Apertagood first issue tests
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 64/100
-
good first issue tests
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
-
bug
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 30/100
code-chronicles-code/leetcode-curriculum#418 · 1 commento ·
Tutte le issue di code-chronicles-code/leetcode-curriculum
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
mksglu/context-mode#1200 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
jaegertracing/jaeger-ui#4506 ·
-
area:desktop area:ui bug platform:macos
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
anthropics/claude-code#96687 ·
-
good first issue
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 95/100
AOSSIE-Org/DebateAI#582 · 2 commenti ·