[bot] OpenAI-compatible chat completions streaming drops `reasoning_content` (affects DeepSeek and other providers using the plain OpenAI SDK)
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 3/5
- Tempo stimato
- 1-2 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 65/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Specificata chiaramente
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- javascript, typescript
- Ambito
- backend-api-design, devtools, observability-sre
Direzione di ricerca
The issue is in js/src/instrumentation/plugins/openai-plugin.ts. Start by examining the aggregateChatCompletionChunks function and the AggregatedChatChoice and toChatChoice types. Compare with the fixed implementations in groq-plugin.ts and openrouter-plugin.ts to understand the pattern for adding reasoning content aggregation. The goal is to modify the shared function to read delta.reasoning, delta.reasoning_content, or delta.reasoning_details and include them in the aggregated output. Test by simulating a streaming response from an OpenAI-compatible provider like DeepSeek.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Summary
The shared streaming aggregation function used by the plain OpenAI plugin (aggregateChatCompletionChunks in js/src/instrumentation/plugins/openai-plugin.ts) does not capture reasoning/reasoning_content/reasoning_details fields from chat-completions streaming deltas. This function is the base implementation used directly by the OpenAI chat.completions.create channel — the exact code path exercised whenever a user points the vanilla openai npm package at a custom baseURL, which is DeepSeek's own documented integration method (and a common pattern for other OpenAI-compatible inference providers/self-hosted reasoning models). Reasoning content emitted during streaming by these providers is silently dropped from spans.
This is the same class of bug already found and fixed three times in sibling/downstream plugins — Mistral (#1857, fixed), OpenRouter (#1883, fixed), and Groq (#1911, fixed) — but in each of those fixes, the shared base function itself was left untouched, so the gap persists for any consumer that reaches it directly (i.e. the plain OpenAI SDK against a third-party OpenAI-compatible endpoint).
What instrumentation is missing
Streaming aggregation never reads reasoning fields
In js/src/instrumentation/plugins/openai-plugin.ts:
AggregatedChatChoice(lines 408–420) has fields forrole,content,refusal,audio,toolCallsByIndex,logprobs, andfinish_reason— no field for reasoning content.aggregateChatCompletionChunks(lines 459 onward) readsdelta.finish_reason,delta.role,delta.content,delta.refusal, anddelta.audio(lines 505–534+) — there is no branch readingdelta.reasoningordelta.reasoning_content.toChatChoice(lines 435–452) builds the final aggregated message fromrole,content,refusal,audio,tool_callsonly.
A repo-wide check confirms this: js/src/instrumentation/plugins/openai-plugin.ts has zero occurrences of "reasoning" (case-insensitive). By contrast, js/src/instrumentation/plugins/groq-plugin.ts (lines 680–720) wraps this exact shared function with an additional aggregateGroqReasoning post-processing step specifically because the shared function doesn't handle it — direct proof the underlying gap was deliberately routed around for Groq's fix rather than fixed at the source, leaving it open for every other consumer of the shared function.
Vendor types have no typed reasoning field either
js/src/vendor-sdk-types/openai-common.ts, OpenAIChatDelta (lines 135–143):
interface OpenAIChatDelta {
role?: string;
content?: string;
refusal?: string;
audio?: OpenAIChatAudio | null;
tool_calls?: OpenAIChatToolCallDelta[];
finish_reason?: string | null;
[key: string]: unknown;
}
The [key: string]: unknown index signature means the runtime value is present on delta when a provider sends it, but the aggregation code never reads it.
Non-streaming path is unaffected
The non-streaming chatCompletionsCreate handler (openai-plugin.ts lines 89–109) uses extractOutput: (result) => result?.choices, a full passthrough — so message.reasoning_content survives for non-streaming calls. The gap is specific to streaming aggregation.
Upstream API format
DeepSeek's chat completions API (OpenAI-compatible, accessed via the plain openai SDK with a custom baseURL per DeepSeek's own quickstart) returns chain-of-thought content in thinking-enabled models via a reasoning_content field at the same level as content. In streaming responses this is delta.reasoning_content, a nullable string emitted incrementally in chat.completion.chunk objects, analogous to how delta.content streams the final answer.
- DeepSeek API reference: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/api/create-chat-completion
- DeepSeek Thinking Mode guide: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/guides/thinking_mode/
This same non-standard reasoning/reasoning_content/reasoning_details extension pattern is also what OpenRouter (#1883) and Groq (#1911) needed dedicated fixes for — it is a broadly used convention among OpenAI-compatible providers, not unique to one vendor.
Comparison with other providers in this repo
| Provider | Reasoning content captured in streaming |
|---|---|
| Anthropic | thinking_delta aggregated |
| Google GenAI | thought parts handled |
| AI SDK | reasoning-delta chunks aggregated |
| Cohere | thinking content blocks aggregated |
| Mistral | thinking chunks aggregated — fixed in #1857 |
| OpenRouter | reasoning/reasoning_content/reasoning_details aggregated — fixed in #1883 |
| Groq | reasoning aggregated via dedicated wrapper — fixed in #1911 |
OpenAI base plugin (chat.completions.create) |
Silently dropped — this issue |
Braintrust docs status
not_found — checked https://www.braintrust.dev/docs/integrations/ai-providers/openai. The page documents metrics like completion_reasoning_tokens (a token count) and covers pointing the OpenAI client at a custom API base URL/endpoint path, but does not mention reasoning_content capture or DeepSeek/OpenAI-compatible reasoning-content streaming at all.
Local files inspected
js/src/instrumentation/plugins/openai-plugin.ts(lines 89–109: non-streaming passthrough is fine; lines 408–452:AggregatedChatChoice/toChatChoicehave no reasoning field; lines 459–534+:aggregateChatCompletionChunksnever readsdelta.reasoning/delta.reasoning_content)js/src/instrumentation/plugins/openai-channels.ts(chatCompletionsCreatechannel definition)js/src/vendor-sdk-types/openai-common.ts(lines 135–143:OpenAIChatDeltahas no typed reasoning field)js/src/instrumentation/plugins/groq-plugin.ts(lines 680–720: proof pattern — Groq wraps the shared function with its ownaggregateGroqReasoningrather than the shared function being fixed)js/src/instrumentation/plugins/openrouter-plugin.ts(confirmed sibling plugin's own separateaggregateOpenRouterChatChunkshas equivalent handling, unrelated to the shared OpenAI function)
- Lingua principale
- TypeScript
- Stelle
- 27
- Fork
- 13
- Merge medio
- 2g 20h
- PR unite (30g)
- 66
Guida per i contributori
Nessuna guida per i contributori indicizzata per questo repository
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-javascript
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 56/100
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 68/100
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 58/100
-
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 25/100
-
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 28/100
Tutte le issue di braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-javascript
Issue simili
-
bug(cli): hapi doctor inline-media prints a fabricated B:\ helper-script path in packaged installs Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
-
Crush Aperta
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 85/100
catppuccin/catppuccin#3125 ·
-
Add a SECURITY.md Aperta
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 90/100
ElementsProject/cln-application#167 · 1 commento · 1 reazione ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
Quantco/pnpm-licenses#17 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100