Saving a custom provider does not set Goose's default provider/model, leaving Goose unavailable
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 2/5
- Tempo stimato
- 1-3 ore
- Idoneità per principianti
- 76/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Specificata chiaramente
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- typescript
- Ambito
- desktop
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia da src/features/providers/hooks/useCustomProviders.ts e confronta il relativo flusso di configurazione riuscito con useCredentials.ts, che chiama saveDefaultProviderSelection. Leggi src/features/providers/defaultProviderConfig.ts per capire come vengono aggiornati i valori predefiniti e lo stato di disponibilità. Il lavoro è completato quando un provider personalizzato appena salvato seleziona un modello solo quando non esistono valori predefiniti, rende persistenti entrambi i valori predefiniti di Goose e diventa selezionabile dopo il ricaricamento senza sostituire i valori predefiniti esistenti.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Before filing
- I searched open and closed issues for duplicates.
- I reproduced this on the latest release.
- This is one bug, not several bundled together.
Closest existing issue
none found
What's broken
Saving a valid custom OpenAI-compatible provider writes the provider JSON and stores its credential, but it does not persist Goose's active provider and model. Goose remains not_ready and cannot be selected in a chat, even after restarting Berd. In this case it was Opencode Zen.
Steps to reproduce
- Start with a Goose profile that has no saved default provider or model, then launch Berd.
- Open Settings and use the provider connection dialog to create a custom OpenAI-compatible provider.
- Configure the provider with:
- Name:
OpenCode Zen - API URL:
https://opencode.ai - Base path:
/zen/v1/responses - Authentication: enabled, with a valid OpenCode Zen API key
- Model list including
gpt-5.6-luna
- Name:
- Save the provider. The resulting custom-provider file is valid and contains the expected base URL, base path, and model list.
- Return to either a new chat or an existing chat with prior history and open the agent/model picker.
- Observe that Goose is unavailable and reports
not_ready. - Quit and relaunch Berd.
- Observe that Goose is still unavailable.
What you expected to happen
After Berd successfully saves and verifies the custom provider, it should save that provider and one of its models as Goose's active defaults when Goose has no defaults yet. Goose should become selectable without editing Goose configuration files manually.
What actually happened
Berd created this provider configuration successfully:
{
"name": "custom_opencode_zen",
"engine": "openai",
"base_url": "https://opencode.ai",
"base_path": "/zen/v1/responses",
"requires_auth": true
}
However, ~/.config/goose/config.yaml still had no GOOSE_PROVIDER or GOOSE_MODEL entry. The bundled Goose diagnostic reported that no provider was configured, so Berd continued to classify the Goose harness as not_ready. Restarting Berd did not change that state.
The workaround was to add these entries manually:
GOOSE_PROVIDER: custom_opencode_zen
GOOSE_MODEL: gpt-5.6-luna
After reloading Berd's Goose process, the same provider passed its authentication and connection checks and Goose became selectable.
How often does it happen?
Every time — reliably reproducible
Berd version
0.6.2, the latest release at the time of reporting
Operating system
macOS (Apple Silicon)
Model and provider
Opencode Zen, all models
Relevant log output
The app log repeatedly classified the harness as not ready before the workaround:
[2026-08-20][01:17:41][tauri_plugin_berdctl::server][INFO] [berdctl] /v1/call command=info result=harness_not_ready duration_ms=580
[2026-08-20][01:26:06][tauri_plugin_berdctl::server][INFO] [berdctl] /v1/call command=info result=harness_not_ready duration_ms=1
[2026-08-20][01:27:17][tauri_plugin_berdctl::server][INFO] [berdctl] /v1/call command=info result=harness_not_ready duration_ms=1
Before the workaround, the bundled Goose diagnostic returned:
Provider Check:
Provider: not configured: Configuration value not found: GOOSE_PROVIDER
After adding the two missing default entries and reloading Goose, the diagnostic returned:
Provider Check:
Provider: custom_opencode_zen
Model: gpt-5.6-luna
Auth: ok
Connection: ok
Screenshots, recordings, or other context
I did not patch the Berd application or its bundled Goose binary. The only persistent manual change was adding GOOSE_PROVIDER and GOOSE_MODEL to ~/.config/goose/config.yaml; I then reloaded the Goose process.
A read-only inspection of current main suggests that custom-provider creation and update refresh the provider catalog and model cache, but do not call the existing default-selection helper:
useCustomProviders.tssaves the custom provider and refreshes its models.useCredentials.tscallssaveDefaultProviderSelection(providerId)for configured built-in providers when readiness isneeds_setup.defaultProviderConfig.tsalready persists both defaults and refreshes the readiness store.
The likely fix is to give successful custom-provider setup the same conditional default-selection behavior, without replacing an existing default provider.
This report is only about the missing Goose defaults and readiness state. Endpoint path composition is a separate concern and is not included here.
Bug identified and fixed by GPT 5.6 Sol from a Berd chat, this report was generated by 5.6 Sol in Berd as well.
- Lingua principale
- TypeScript
- Stelle
- 928
- Fork
- 121
- Merge medio
- 1g 11h
- PR unite (30g)
- 71
Preparare l'ambiente
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di block/berd
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 88/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 88/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 91/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Issue simili
-
priority: P2
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
prime-radiant-inc/evener#3291 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
accessibility bug revealjs
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 84/100
quarto-dev/quarto-cli#14961 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 90/100
supabase/agent-skills#614 ·
-
Content
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
RunestoneInteractive/rs#1559 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni