Unexpected results from rule matching

Hi,
I have standalone apps and APIs in my environment. But, it seems like the SamplingRule.match() always return the highest priority rule as the result for all standalone apps. Currently, all the rules are in the cloud.

My use case is to have a blanket rule to ignore a certain endpoint from multiple APIs and still be able to tweak sampling rules for standalone apps and/or APIs.

Here's my sample test:

import time
import pytest

from aws_xray_sdk.core.sampling.sampling_rule import SamplingRule
from aws_xray_sdk.core.sampling.rule_cache import RuleCache
from aws_xray_sdk.core.sampling.reservoir import Reservoir

rule_ignore = SamplingRule(name='ignore', priority=10, rate=0,
                      reservoir_size=0, host='*', method='*',
                      path='/ignore_endpoint', service='*',
                      service_type='*')
rule_std_app1 = SamplingRule(name='std_app1', priority=20, rate=0.5,
                      reservoir_size=10, host='*', method='*',
                      path='*', service='std_app1',
                      service_type='*')
rule_api1 = SamplingRule(name='api1', priority=20, rate=0.5,
                      reservoir_size=10, host='*', method='*',
                      path='*', service='api1',
                      service_type='*')
rule_default = SamplingRule(name='Default', priority=1000, rate=0.1,
                            reservoir_size=1)

def test_rule_matching():
    cache = RuleCache()
    now = int(time.time())
    cache.load_rules([rule_ignore, rule_std_app1, rule_api1, rule_default])
    cache.last_updated = now
    
    print("\n")

    sampling_req = {'path':'/ignore_endpoint'}
    rule = cache.get_matched_rule(sampling_req, now)
    print(f"\nsampling_req: {sampling_req}\nExpected: ignore, Matched: {rule.name}")
    print(f"{rule.name} == 'ignore'? {rule.name == 'ignore'}")
    # assert rule.name == 'ignore'

    sampling_req = {'service':'std_app1'}
    rule = cache.get_matched_rule(sampling_req, now)
    print(f"\nsampling_req: {sampling_req}\nExpected: std_app1, Matched: {rule.name}")
    print(f"{rule.name} == 'std_app1'? {rule.name == 'std_app1'}")
    # assert rule.name == 'std_app1'

    sampling_req = {'service':'std_app2'}
    rule = cache.get_matched_rule(sampling_req, now)
    print(f"\nsampling_req: {sampling_req}\nExpected: Default, Matched: {rule.name}")
    print(f"{rule.name} == 'Default'? {rule.is_default()}")
    # assert rule.is_default()

    sampling_req = {'service':'api1', 'path':'/test'}
    rule = cache.get_matched_rule(sampling_req, now)
    print(f"\nsampling_req: {sampling_req}\nExpected: api1, Matched: {rule.name}")
    print(f"{rule.name} == 'api1'? {rule.name == 'api1'}")
    # assert rule.name == 'api1'

Here's the debug output for the print statements

sampling_req: {'path': '/ignore_endpoint'}
Expected: ignore, Matched: ignore
ignore == 'ignore'? True

sampling_req: {'service': 'std_app1'}
Expected: std_app1, Matched: ignore
ignore == 'std_app1'? False

sampling_req: {'service': 'std_app2'}
Expected: Default, Matched: ignore
ignore == 'Default'? False

sampling_req: {'service': 'api1', 'path': '/test'}
Expected: api1, Matched: api1
api1 == 'api1'? True

As you can see, the standalone apps (std_app1 and std_app2) resulted with ignore rule instead of the expected rule.

Please confirm if this is an expected behavior or a bug?