Hacktoberfest 2026: le issue che i maintainer hanno segnato per ottobre, aperte e adatte ai principianti. Sfoglia le issue Hacktoberfest

credentials static web identity credentials not picked up without an explicit profile option

Aperta
#3,241 5 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Valutazione

Difficoltà
3/5
Tempo stimato
1-2 giorni
Idoneità per principianti
48/100
Tipo di issue
Bug
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Stato di attività
Ferma
Stack tecnologico
aws, ruby

Direzione di ricerca

Inizia da gems/aws-sdk-core/lib/aws-sdk-core/credential_provider_chain.rb e gems/aws-sdk-core/lib/aws-sdk-core/plugins/credentials_configuration.rb, quindi esamina il comportamento della configurazione condivisa descritto nella riproduzione. Usa le due chiamate a Aws::SQS::Client.new con la configurazione dell’identità web per verificare le richieste STS correnti. Il lavoro è completato quando viene usata la configurazione condivisa predefinita senza un profilo esplicito e i client creati ripetutamente non eseguono ciascuno un refresh separato.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

feature-request needs-major-version
Describe the bug

We're using STS web identity token credentials to manage AWS SDK service call authentication via SigV4 (aws-sdk-core (3.211.0), should be the relevant bit). We noticed however, during load testing, some rate limiting happening, which we narrowed down to multiple calls to the STS token refresh endpoint, exacerbated by the scaling up of certain services. After some investigation, we figured out that multiple clients (for SQS, SNS, etc) were instantiated, and the token refresh path was called for each of them. This is not ideal, as there should be a single "refresh" happening, and the token should at best be shared across the multiple clients.

In the process, we found out that the AWS SDKs already support that via "shared config", and we proceeded to change our approach using it, replacing the env var setup using AWS_WEB_IDENTITY_TOKEN_FILE and AWS_ROLE_ARN with a AWS_CONFIG_FILE pointing to a file like this:

[default]
web_identity_token_file = $AWS_WEB_IDENTITY_TOKEN_FILE
role_arn = $AWS_ROLE_ARN
Expected Behavior

This should have worked, as in, when instantiating clients multiple times, there should only be one call to STS. This can be observed using this script:

Aws.config[:http_wire_trace] = true

Aws::SQS::Client.new
# one STS request log
Aws::SQS::Client.new
# no STS request log
Current Behavior

when instantiating two client instances, two STS requests are made.

While we noticed that Aws.shared_config was correctly filled up with the expected values, unfortunately calling i.e. Aws::SQS::Client.new was still going through this strategy and generating a token + refresh loop per client, because of this clause, i.e. the routine expects a profile to be set, however it's nil as per the option setup, although the docs say it's "default".

I believe this is a bug, as if "default", this would have worked. I also tried setting the AWS_PROFILE env var, but that doesn't fill it up either.

FWIW, setting Aws.config[:profile] = "default", or explicit option set a la Aws::SQS::Client.new(profile: "default"), work as expected (shared config is picked up). However, I'm looking for a "no config code" setup that can be rolled out across multiple services.

Reproduction Steps
Aws.config[:http_wire_trace] = true

Aws::SQS::Client.new
# one STS request log
Aws::SQS::Client.new
# no STS request log
Possible Solution

Perhaps initializing the profile option to whatever AWS_PROFILE defines?

Additional Information/Context

No response

Gem name ('aws-sdk', 'aws-sdk-resources' or service gems like 'aws-sdk-s3') and its version

aws-sdk-core 3.211.0

Environment details (Version of Ruby, OS environment)

"ruby 3.3.0 (2023-12-25 revision 5124f9ac75) [x86_64-linux]"

Lingua principale
Ruby
Stelle
3.7k
Fork
1.2k
Merge medio
1g 16h
PR unite (30g)
25

Preparare l'ambiente

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di aws/aws-sdk-ruby

Tutte le issue di aws/aws-sdk-ruby

Issue simili

Altre issue su Ruby

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.