[Bug] The static-topic commands ignore -mf/--mapFile and silently recompute the mapping instead
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
@iloveeyjafjalla ci sta già lavorando.
Dal 12/10/2026.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 3/5
- Tempo stimato
- 1-2 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 35/100
Direzione di ricerca
Start with UpdateStaticTopicSubCommand and RemappingStaticTopicSubCommand, focusing on buildCommandlineOptions, execute, and executeFromFile; compare the registered map-file option with the key read by each command. Trace how required options are checked for file and recompute modes, then inspect the force argument passed to updateTopicConfigMappingAll. Done means both commands apply the supplied mapping, file mode accepts its documented options, and updateStaticTopic honors -fr; linked PR #11382 is already open.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Before Creating the Bug Report
- I found a bug, not just asking a question, which should be created in GitHub Discussions.
- I have searched the GitHub Issues and GitHub Discussions of this repository and believe that this is not a duplicate.
- I have confirmed that this bug belongs to the current repository, not other repositories of RocketMQ.
Runtime platform environment
OS: any (mqadmin, tools module)
RocketMQ version
branch: develop
Git commit id: 9ea2ccdc2b41445aee5e177e14e501d606f5a1ed (verified against this base; the files are unchanged on develop@b76420599)
JDK Version
Compiler: Temurin 1.8.0_504 (target 1.8, same as CI)
Describe the Bug
The map-file mode of the two static-topic commands is unreachable, and the documented invocation silently does something else.
Both commands register the option under the key mf and then read a different key:
// UpdateStaticTopicSubCommand / RemappingStaticTopicSubCommand, buildCommandlineOptions
opt = new Option("mf", "mapFile", true, "The mapping data file name");
...
// execute(...)
if (commandLine.hasOption("f")) { // "f" is registered nowhere
executeFromFile(commandLine, options, rpcHook);
return;
}
...
// executeFromFile(...)
String mapFileName = commandLine.getOptionValue('f').trim(); // null -> NPE if ever reached
So mqadmin updateStaticTopic -t T -b brokerA -qn 8 -mf plan.json parses (the help text advertises
-mf,--mapFile <arg>), never reads plan.json, and takes the recompute path instead — the command rewrites the static
topic mapping computed from the cluster's current state rather than applying the mapping the operator supplied. The only
way to reach the file mode is to pass -f, which the parser rejects with Unrecognized option: -f.
In addition, the file mode cannot even be invoked the way it is meant to be, because the parser demands options that mode
does not use:
OptionGroup("-b", "-c")issetRequired(true);UpdateStaticTopicSubCommandalso marks-qn/--totalQueueNumrequired;
so mqadmin updateStaticTopic -t T -mf plan.json (the target brokers and the queue count come from the file) fails to
parse; ServerUtil.parseCmdLine then prints the help and calls System.exit(1). Both recompute paths already validate
these options themselves (if (!hasOption("b") && !hasOption("c") || !hasOption("qn")) { printCommandLineHelp(...); return; }).
Finally, once the file mode is reachable, UpdateStaticTopicSubCommand ignores -fr/--forceReplace:
force is parsed and then MQAdminUtils.updateTopicConfigMappingAll(..., false) is called with a literal.
Steps to Reproduce
mqadmin updateStaticTopic -t T -b brokerA -qn 8 -mf plan.jsonwith a plan file whose mapping differs from the current
cluster state → the file is not read; a recomputed mapping is written instead.mqadmin updateStaticTopic -t T -mf plan.json→Missing required option, help, exit code 1.mqadmin remappingStaticTopic -t T -mf plan.json→ same as 2 (-b|-crequired).
Expected behavior
The documented -mf/--mapFile invocation reads the mapping from the named file and applies it (honoring -fr), and the
from-file mode does not require the target brokers or the queue count, which the file carries.
Actual behavior
The map file is ignored and the mapping is recomputed; without -b|-c (and -qn) the invocation does not even parse; -fr
is discarded in updateStaticTopic.
Additional context
Fix: read the option key the commands register, stop requiring -b|-c|-qn in the from-file mode (the recompute mode still
validates them), and pass the parsed force through.
- Lingua principale
- Java
- Stelle
- 22.7k
- Fork
- 12k
- Merge medio
- 3g 18h
- PR unite (30g)
- 17
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di apache/rocketmq
-
[Bug] RemotingHelper.connect swaps the socket send and receive buffer configurationForse già presa @amalsaidov l’ha presa oggi. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
CompressionType.of fails under the Turkish localeForse già presa @sharanggupta l’ha presa oggi. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 83/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[rocketmq-client-python] TransactionMQProducer allocates an unused producer during initializationAperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[Bug] notifyMasterOnline aborts the long-polling wake-up with a NullPointerException when an arrival drains a bucket firstForse già presa @iloveeyjafjalla l’ha presa 29 giorni fa. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
apache/rocketmq#11441 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[Enhancement] FilterFactory duplicate-registration and unregister semantics lack testsForse già presa @chennaji9 l’ha presa 34 giorni fa. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 84/100
apache/rocketmq#11340 · 2 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di apache/rocketmq
Issue simili
-
bug emitter:client:csharp
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 84/100
microsoft/typespec#12572 · 1 commento · 1 reazione ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
GCC 15.2: -Wcast-qual warning - cast discards const qualifier from pointer target type (H5trace.c)Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 73/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
needs-area-label
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
area/ai area/backend component/zeebe kind/task
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
spAnser/reacharound#38 ·