Allow supplying a KmsClient instance/supplier instead of only a reflectively-instantiated class name
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Idoneità per principianti
- 35/100
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia leggendo KeyToolkit.getKmsClient(...) e i percorsi di reflection esistenti di CryptoFactory, DecryptionPropertiesFactory e EncryptionPropertiesFactory. Conferma con i maintainer l’API e il meccanismo di archiviazione preferiti, quindi aggiungi la coverage per un KmsClient fornito privo di un costruttore senza argomenti, preservando la costruzione tramite reflection e il comportamento di initialize(...).
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Describe the enhancement requested
The key-tools KMS integration (org.apache.parquet.crypto.keytools) instantiates the KmsClient purely by reflection from a class name: KeyToolkit.getKmsClient(...) reads parquet.encryption.kms.client.class and calls newInstance(), requiring a public no-arg constructor, with credentials expected to arrive later via KmsClient.initialize(conf, kmsInstanceID, kmsInstanceURL, accessToken). The same reflective no-arg pattern applies to CryptoFactory / DecryptionPropertiesFactory / EncryptionPropertiesFactory via parquet.crypto.factory.class.
This works well when a KMS client is stateless and can bootstrap all of its credentials from the Configuration plus the access-token string. It does not work for clients that must be constructed with their dependencies and can't be reduced to a class name + string token, e.g.:
- clients holding a live, credential-bearing SDK handle (federated / workload-identity credentials that aren't representable as a token string);
- clients created and wired by a dependency-injection container;
- in-memory / fake KMS clients used in tests, which carry per-test state and have no meaningful no-arg form.
For these, users must build a static side-channel: register the real instance in a static map keyed by a UUID written into the Configuration, point parquet.encryption.kms.client.class at a thin reflective shim that looks the instance back up in initialize(), and override parquet.encryption.kms.instance.id per instance to avoid colliding on KeyToolkit's per-(kmsInstanceID, accessToken) client cache. That's global mutable state with its own lifecycle/leak management and a one-Configuration-per-client invariant — boilerplate every such user reinvents.
Proposal. Add an opt-in, fully backward-compatible way to supply a pre-built KmsClient (or a Supplier<KmsClient> / small factory) programmatically, which KeyToolkit.getKmsClient(...) prefers over class-name reflection when present. Reflection stays the default, so existing configs are untouched. Rough shape (names TBD):
// today (still works):
conf.set("parquet.encryption.kms.client.class", "com.example.MyKmsClient");
// proposed addition:
KeyToolkit.setKmsClientFactory(conf, () -> myPreBuiltKmsClient); // or a KmsClientFactory
initialize(...) would still be invoked on the supplied instance, so credential/token plumbing is unchanged.
Scope / non-goals. No new dependencies and no vendor-specific code — this is only about how a KmsClient is provided, not which one. PropertiesDrivenCryptoFactory, the KeyMaterial format, caching, per-column keys, and key-rotation tooling are all unchanged; this only lifts the requirement that the client be reflectively no-arg constructible.
Question for maintainers. Would a change along these lines be welcome? And do you prefer (a) a Supplier<KmsClient> set on the Configuration / read-write options, or (b) a settable KmsClientFactory on KeyToolkit? Happy to implement it and open a PR (with tests using a non-no-arg client) once there's agreement on direction.
Component(s)
Core
- Lingua principale
- Java
- Stelle
- 3.1k
- Fork
- 1.6k
- Merge medio
- 6g 16h
- PR unite (30g)
- 36
Guida per i contributori
Nessuna guida per i contributori indicizzata per questo repository
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di apache/parquet-java
-
Type: bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
apache/parquet-java#3792 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
apache/parquet-java#3767 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
apache/parquet-java#3695 · 1 commento ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
apache/parquet-java#3667 ·
-
Type: bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
apache/parquet-java#3587 ·
Tutte le issue di apache/parquet-java
Issue simili
-
documentation
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
inu-appcenter/memorIN-backend#288 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
-
frontend maui-pilot pilot-ask question
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
-
executions.Query — startDate and timeRange filters are sent with inverted comparison operators Apertaarea/plugin
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
kestra-io/plugin-kestra#190 ·