Hacktoberfest 2026: le issue che i maintainer hanno segnato per ottobre, aperte e adatte ai principianti. Sfoglia le issue Hacktoberfest

[IPC][ZSTD] Compressed buffer prefix can be written as 0 while ZSTD frame has non-zero content size

Aperta
#1,116 1 commento 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Valutazione

Difficoltà
4/5
Tempo stimato
3-5 giorni
Idoneità per principianti
38/100
Tipo di issue
Bug
Chiarezza
Da chiarire
Stato di attività
Tranquilla
Stack tecnologico
java

Direzione di ricerca

Inizia tracciando il percorso di compressione attraverso AbstractCompressionCodec.compress() e ZstdCompressionCodec.doCompress(), usando la configurazione di ArrowStreamWriter indicata e scritture ripetute di VectorSchemaRoot. L’issue non ha un reproducer deterministico né un file di test denominato, quindi isola innanzitutto il caso di uno schema ampio con timestamp nullable tutti null. Il lavoro è completato quando un test di regressione dimostra che il prefisso Arrow corrisponde alla content size di ZSTD e che i reader possono caricare il batch.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

Type: bug
Describe the bug, including details regarding any error messages, version, and platform.
Describe the bug

We observed Arrow IPC streams written by Arrow Java where a ZSTD-compressed buffer has an invalid 8-byte uncompressed-length prefix.

The compressed payload itself appears to be a valid ZSTD frame, but the Arrow IPC prefix is 0, while the ZSTD frame reports a non-zero decompressed content size.

This makes downstream readers fail. In our case ClickHouse 26.1 fails with:

Error while reading batch of Arrow data:
IOError: ZSTD decompression failed: Destination buffer is too small

The same file also fails when loaded with Arrow Java ArrowStreamReader.

This has been observed with both:

  • Arrow Java 18.3.0 + zstd-jni 1.5.7-6
  • Arrow Java 19.0.0 + zstd-jni 1.5.7-7
Environment

Observed with both dependency sets:

  1. Original environment

    • Apache Arrow Java: 18.3.0
    • org.apache.arrow:arrow-vector:18.3.0
    • org.apache.arrow:arrow-memory-netty:18.3.0
    • org.apache.arrow:arrow-compression:18.3.0
    • com.github.luben:zstd-jni:1.5.7-6
  2. Also reproduced with

    • Apache Arrow Java: 19.0.0
    • org.apache.arrow:arrow-vector:19.0.0
    • org.apache.arrow:arrow-memory-netty:19.0.0
    • org.apache.arrow:arrow-compression:19.0.0
    • com.github.luben:zstd-jni:1.5.7-7

Other context:

  • Java: 17
  • Writer API:
    • ArrowStreamWriter
    • CommonsCompressionFactory.INSTANCE
    • CompressionUtil.CodecType.ZSTD

Writer creation:

new ArrowStreamWriter(
    root,
    null,
    channel,
    IpcOption.DEFAULT,
    CommonsCompressionFactory.INSTANCE,
    CompressionUtil.CodecType.ZSTD
);
What happened

One generated Arrow IPC stream contains 44 record batches and a valid end marker. The total row count from record batch metadata matches the sidecar count file.

However, batch 21 fails to load.

Inspection results:

file size: 26090728 bytes
schema fields: 504
record batches: 44
batch metadata row sum: 92936
sidecar count: 92936

The failure occurs on batch 21.

batch=21
rows=3469
field[446]=update_date type=Timestamp(MILLISECOND, null)
node length=3469
node nullCount=3469

For this Timestamp(MILLISECOND) vector, the data buffer should decompress to:

3469 rows * 8 bytes = 27752 bytes

But the compressed buffer contains:

buffer[1264]
compressedBytes=27
declaredUncompressed=0
zstdContentSize=27752

So the Arrow IPC compressed buffer prefix says the uncompressed length is 0, but the ZSTD frame itself reports 27752.

Neighboring batches for the same buffer look correct:

batch=20 buffer[1264]
declaredUncompressed=22552
zstdContentSize=22552

batch=22 buffer[1264]
declaredUncompressed=20672
zstdContentSize=20672
Expected behavior

The 8-byte Arrow IPC compressed buffer prefix should match the uncompressed length of the compressed payload.

For the failing buffer, it should have been:

declaredUncompressed=27752
Actual behavior

The prefix is written as:

declaredUncompressed=0

while the ZSTD frame content size is:

zstdContentSize=27752

This causes readers to allocate a zero-sized or too-small destination buffer, then fail during ZSTD decompression.

Arrow Java reader failure

Loading the file with Arrow Java fails at batch 21:

failedAfterBatches=20
rowsBeforeFailure=39866
bytesReadBeforeFailure=12083504

java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException:
index: 0, length: 512 (expected: range(0, 504))
    at org.apache.arrow.memory.ArrowBuf.checkIndex(ArrowBuf.java:690)
    at org.apache.arrow.memory.ArrowBuf.setBytes(ArrowBuf.java:942)
    at org.apache.arrow.vector.BaseFixedWidthVector.reAlloc(BaseFixedWidthVector.java:443)
    at org.apache.arrow.vector.BaseFixedWidthVector.setValueCount(BaseFixedWidthVector.java:764)
    at org.apache.arrow.vector.VectorSchemaRoot.setRowCount(VectorSchemaRoot.java:247)
    at org.apache.arrow.vector.VectorLoader.load(VectorLoader.java:90)
    at org.apache.arrow.vector.ipc.ArrowReader.loadRecordBatch(ArrowReader.java:213)
    at org.apache.arrow.vector.ipc.ArrowStreamReader.loadNextBatch(ArrowStreamReader.java:161)
ClickHouse reader failure

ClickHouse fails on the same Arrow stream:

Code: 33. DB::Exception:
Error while reading batch of Arrow data:
IOError: ZSTD decompression failed: Destination buffer is too small:
While executing WaitForAsyncInsert. (CANNOT_READ_ALL_DATA)
Diagnostic code used

The following kind of check was used to inspect the failing compressed buffer:

long declared = ByteBuffer.wrap(bytes, 0, 8)
    .order(ByteOrder.LITTLE_ENDIAN)
    .getLong();

byte[] frame = Arrays.copyOfRange(bytes, 8, len);
long zstdContentSize = Zstd.decompressedSize(frame);

System.out.println("declaredUncompressed=" + declared);
System.out.println("zstdContentSize=" + zstdContentSize);

For the failing buffer:

declaredUncompressed=0
zstdContentSize=27752
Notes

We have not yet produced a small deterministic reproducer. The issue was found in production-generated Arrow IPC streams with a wide schema and repeated batch writes using the same VectorSchemaRoot.

The writer pattern is:

for each batch:
    root.clear();
    for (FieldVector vector : root.getFieldVectors()) {
        vector.allocateNew();
    }
    root.setRowCount(batchSize);

    // populate vectors

    for (FieldVector vector : vectors) {
        vector.setValueCount(batchSize);
    }

    writer.writeBatch();

The failing column is a nullable Timestamp(MILLISECOND) vector where the entire failing batch has nulls for that column.

A minimal test with only one nullable timestamp column and all-null values did not reproduce the issue, so this may require a wider schema, vector reuse, or a particular buffer lifecycle pattern.

Additional reproduction note

We also tested with Apache Arrow Java 19.0.0 and zstd-jni 1.5.7-7, and the same class of corruption still occurs: the ZSTD frame has a non-zero decompressed content size, but the Arrow IPC compressed buffer prefix is written as 0.

This suggests the issue is not limited to Arrow Java 18.3.0 or zstd-jni 1.5.7-6.

Workaround

We worked around this locally by replacing the default ZSTD codec with a custom codec that captures input.writerIndex() before compression, writes that value into the first 8 bytes of the compressed buffer, and verifies the prefix immediately after writing.

This avoids producing a buffer where the ZSTD frame content size and Arrow IPC declared uncompressed length diverge.

Questions
  • Is this a known issue in Arrow Java IPC ZSTD compression around AbstractCompressionCodec.compress() / ZstdCompressionCodec.doCompress()?
  • Could uncompressedBuffer.writerIndex() become stale or zero between doCompress() and writeUncompressedLength() in the parent codec?
  • Are there known issues with reusing VectorSchemaRoot across many compressed IPC batches in Arrow Java 18.3.0 or 19.0.0?
Lingua principale
Java
Stelle
95
Fork
154
Merge medio
2g 10h
PR unite (30g)
11

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di apache/arrow-java

Tutte le issue di apache/arrow-java

Issue simili

Altre issue su Java

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.