bug(select): exit fade resets opacity before deferred panel removal with legacy animations
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 56/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- angular, typescript
- Ambito
- frontend
Direzione di ricerca
Start with the supplied isolated reproduction and inspect the Material select exit animation styles and the detachment methods mentioned in the issue. Run the Chromium reproduction with and without the legacy trigger, then verify that the panel retains its transparent final state until DOM removal without regressing the exit fade.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Is this a regression?
- Yes, this behavior used to work in the previous version
Unknown. It was noticed recently, but I have not established the first affected Angular/Material or Chromium version.
Description
A mat-select panel can become opaque again after its closing fade has finished, before Angular actually removes its DOM node. The transient panel is visible as a flash in Chromium.
A reduced example uses only Angular, Material's prebuilt azure-blue theme, a standalone select, zoneless change detection, and provideAnimationsAsync(). Binding an empty legacy animation trigger on the root component activates the legacy animation renderer and reproduces the delayed removal / opacity rebound. There is no application filter logic, routing, custom select animation, or overlay configuration in this reduced case.
Reproduction
Complete isolated source and one-click StackBlitz launcher: https://gist.github.com/EthanSK/056299e55311004487e48e0a6f66b203
REPL link limitation: The official StackBlitz SDK launcher opens the complete project, but its anonymous generated URL is session-scoped until saved to an account, so the gist is the persistent entry point. I verified that the launcher opens the expected project files and begins dependency installation; remote dependency installation and browser preview have not completed in this test. CodeSandbox’s angular-cli preset unconditionally requires zone.js even though this reproduction is zoneless, and its generic Node sandbox did not start an Angular CLI preview. I did not add Zone.js because that would change the relevant configuration. The same component/providers were actually run and measured in a local Angular CLI build using the tested package versions.
- Run the supplied example in Chromium 153. Tested with 153.0.8010.48 on macOS 26.6.2.
- Open Choice, let the opening animation finish, then press Escape without changing the value. Repeat, leaving the page otherwise idle.
- For measurements, enable the optional diagnostics described in the reproduction. They sample
animationend, its microtask, a zero-delay timer, and actual DOM disconnection. They do not run a continuousrequestAnimationFrameloop. - Compare with the empty
animations: [trigger(...)]declaration and matching template binding removed, keepingprovideAnimationsAsync()configured. - Restore the trigger and add only the exit
animation-fill-mode: forwardsrule below.
Minimal component/provider configuration:
@Component({
selector: 'app-root',
imports: [MatFormFieldModule, MatSelectModule],
animations: [trigger('activateLegacyRenderer', [])],
template: `
<h1 @activateLegacyRenderer>Material select close reproduction</h1>
<mat-form-field>
<mat-label>Choice</mat-label>
<mat-select value="one">
<mat-option value="one">One</mat-option>
<mat-option value="two">Two</mat-option>
<mat-option value="three">Three</mat-option>
</mat-select>
</mat-form-field>
`,
})
class SelectReproductionComponent {}
bootstrapApplication(SelectReproductionComponent, {
providers: [provideZonelessChangeDetection(), provideAnimationsAsync()],
});
Expected Behavior
The select remains transparent after its exit fade completes and until its DOM is removed.
Actual Behavior
The exit animation has fill mode none. When it finishes, computed opacity returns to 1 while the panel is still connected. The legacy animation renderer defers actual node removal, leaving an opportunity for the opaque panel to be painted.
Repeated measurements of the reduced example:
| Configuration | Result at the zero-delay callback after animationend |
|---|---|
| Zoneless + activated legacy renderer + default CDK overlay | 10/10 still connected, opacity 1 |
Same, with usePopover: false |
10/10 still connected, opacity 1 |
| Remove the bound legacy trigger, retain async animation provider | 10/10 already disconnected |
| Restore trigger and apply forwards fill | 10/10 still connected, opacity 0 |
The baseline default-overlay animationend-to-removal interval was approximately 0.9–2.4 ms. Timing instrumentation can perturb scheduling; these measurements are not a frequency estimate of visible flashes. In the original application, consecutive browser screenshots captured a nearly transparent panel, then a fully opaque panel, then its removal. The reduced example reproduces the same connected/opaque state without application UI or styles.
A narrow workaround that preserves the fade and removal timing:
.mat-mdc-select-panel.mat-select-panel-animations-enabled.mat-select-panel-exit {
animation-fill-mode: forwards;
}
This also prevented the measured rebound in 23/23 matched filter closes in the original application, and restoring the original CSS restored the rebound in 10/10 closes. Material menus already retain their final fade state and did not show this rebound in six control closes.
Environment
- Angular core / animations / platform-browser: 21.2.10
- CDK / Material: 21.2.8
- Angular CLI / build: 21.2.8
- TypeScript: 5.9.3
- RxJS: 7.8.2
- Browser directly instrumented: Chromium 153.0.8010.48 (embedded browser)
- Also observed manually: Google Chrome 153.0.8010.52, including incognito
- Operating system: macOS 26.6.2
- Zoneless with
provideAnimationsAsync()and an active legacy animation trigger
Related issues and scope
- https://github.com/angular/components/pull/30456 addressed a related select-detachment problem. Its
markForCheck()change is already present in the tested version. - https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/58075 concerns zoneless / legacy-animation overlay cleanup and was closed by an earlier fix.
- Source inspection of Material 21.2.14 and 22.1.7 still shows the same no-fill exit and relevant detachment methods. Those newer versions have not been runtime-tested here.
Chromium 153 has animation scheduling changes, but a browser feature toggle / version bisect has not been performed. I am not claiming that Chrome 153 introduced the bug or that it is a Chromium standards violation. Filing here because the select exit loses its final opacity before removal; please redirect to Angular core if the deferred cleanup is the preferred place to address it.
- Lingua principale
- TypeScript
- Stelle
- 25k
- Fork
- 6.8k
- Merge medio
- 1g 1h
- PR unite (30g)
- 84
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di angular/components
-
area: material/tree docs gemini-triaged needs triage
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
angular/components#33832 ·
-
area: material/datepicker gemini-triaged P4
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
angular/components#33763 · 2 commenti · 3 reazioni ·
-
area: material/table gemini-triaged P4
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 88/100
angular/components#33709 · 1 commento ·
-
area: material/table docs gemini-triaged P4
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
angular/components#33455 ·
-
area: material/core gemini-triaged P3
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 78/100
angular/components#33059 · 2 commenti ·
Tutte le issue di angular/components
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
mksglu/context-mode#1200 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
jaegertracing/jaeger-ui#4506 ·
-
area:desktop area:ui bug platform:macos
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
anthropics/claude-code#96687 ·
-
good first issue
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 95/100
AOSSIE-Org/DebateAI#582 · 2 commenti ·