Hacktoberfest 2026: le issue che i maintainer hanno segnato per ottobre, aperte e adatte ai principianti. Sfoglia le issue Hacktoberfest

[TS PBT] Reuse bounded command models and state invariants in hybrid search

Aperta
#402 0 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Valutazione

Difficoltà
5/5
Tempo stimato
Più di una settimana
Idoneità per principianti
35/100
Tipo di issue
Funzionalità
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Stato di attività
Attiva
Stack tecnologico
kotlin

Direzione di ricerca

Read the core assessment in #405 and the related contracts in #395, #353/#354, #396/#398, and #384 before designing the extension; coordinate dependent sequence generation with #400. Run focused checks for reset, within-sequence mutation, guards, replay, and shrinking. Done means a bounded stateful model reproduces a sequence-dependent fault through the original command model and publishes its bounds, commands, and evaluation results.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

Part of the full #345 delivery. Builds on #395, #353/#354, and #396/#398. Coordinate with #400 for dependent sequence generation without making the two implementations cyclic.

Delivery stage

This is a stage-two extension of #345. Complete and record the core assessment in #405 before accepting this extension's end-to-end integration and results. Literature, interface design and focused experiments may start earlier; the extension never blocks #355 or #405.

Reuse the completed core contracts. This issue owns any extension-specific changes to observation, binding, scheduling, replay, shrinking and feedback integration, with focused follow-up PRs; do not retroactively broaden #351/#352 or require already completed core issues to reopen. A negative or inconclusive pilot is recorded honestly and informs design; it does not silently cancel this full-roadmap obligation.

Publish a separately identifiable extension configuration and evaluate it against the same original oracle with the extension disabled. Its final held-out evaluation belongs to #357 and is reported separately from the development pilot.

Goal

Reuse PBT model-based command sequences, guards and postconditions to find stateful faults across a bounded sequence of operations.

Scope

  • Support a bounded synchronous command model with an explicit initial model/SUT state, command identity/arguments, pure admissibility guard and concrete postcondition/invariant. The sequence is one property invocation.
  • Reset model/SUT state between samples, replay and shrink attempts; preserve intended state and aliases between commands in the same sequence. This extends #384 explicitly without introducing persistent cross-sample module state.
  • Begin with a concrete collection/cache-like model and bounded command count. Use supported primitive/tuple arguments and explicit lowering/unrolling rather than requiring arbitrary object graphs or concurrency.
  • Preserve the user's reference model and original command checks as the concrete oracle. Record per-step observations and hypothesis contexts keyed by command/state features.
  • Let USVM select arguments and/or a bounded continuation of a concrete prefix. Reconstruct/reexecute the prefix faithfully; do not assert a sampled heap as a universally reachable symbolic state.
  • Share the common total deadline and target/result/replay contracts. Track sequence bounds, unsupported commands, divergence and model errors separately.
  • Minimize command sequences and arguments with backend support, preserving executable guards and the same failure. Deleting a setup command must not turn a failure into an invalid sequence.
  • No async scheduling, distributed state, uncontrolled I/O or arbitrary environment snapshotting is required.

Definition of Done

  • A real or representative stateful API has a confirmed sequence-dependent fault that is not exposed by isolated calls from the initial state.
  • PBT state/command observations guide a bounded symbolic continuation, which reproduces through the full original command model.
  • Cross-sample reset, within-sequence mutation, invalid guards, prefix replay and sequence shrinking have focused tests.
  • The model, author effort, bounds and supported commands are published. #357 compares the same stateful oracle with and without feedback and with PBT-only generation.
Lingua principale
Kotlin
Stelle
33
Fork
27
Merge medio
2g 20h
PR unite (30g)
10

Preparare l'ambiente

Questo progetto non fornisce container di sviluppo, Dockerfile né guida per i contributori, quindi l'ambiente è a tuo carico: parti dal suo README e consulta la nostra guida al primo contributo per i passaggi generali.

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di UnitTestBot/usvm

Tutte le issue di UnitTestBot/usvm

Issue simili

Altre issue su Kotlin

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.