Hacktoberfest 2026: le issue che i maintainer hanno segnato per ottobre, aperte e adatte ai principianti. Sfoglia le issue Hacktoberfest

Guard human-only Intent commands from agent execution

Aperta
#229 0 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Valutazione

Difficoltà
5/5
Tempo stimato
Più di una settimana
Idoneità per principianti
35/100
Tipo di issue
Funzionalità
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Stato di attività
Attiva
Stack tecnologico
typescript

Direzione di ricerca

Inizia individuando la registrazione dei comandi e la gestione esistente di IntentAudience, agent e automation-context. Associa ogni comando elencato a una classe esplicita di effetto e autorità, quindi esegui o aggiungi test mirati che coprano l’osservazione, il rifiuto delle mutazioni, le eccezioni di dry-run, l’autorizzazione di automation e la non-autorità di audience o pseudo-TTY; il lavoro è completato quando tutti i comandi registrati sono classificati e la matrice di accettazione ha esito positivo.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

enhancement

Problem

IntentAudience controls presentation and redaction only. It is not authority. A TTY proves terminal interaction, not human identity. Current hooks are soft, fail-open convenience controls, not a security boundary. An agent with unrestricted shell and repository write access can bypass CLI guards or edit files directly. OS and host permissions remain the hard boundary.

Intent needs a command effect and authority classification that is separate from audience so an agent context cannot use presentation state or a pseudo-TTY to authorize trust or delivery changes.

Intent has no skill download command today. load reads an already installed permitted skill; it does not download content.

User outcome

Humans can keep existing confirmation-based trust and delivery workflows. Agents can inspect permitted Intent state and load already installed permitted skills. Automation can run its supported paths only through an explicit automation context. Audience never grants mutation authority.

In scope

  • Introduce a command effect and authority classification separate from IntentAudience: observe, trust-mutation, delivery-mutation, source-mutation, and automation.
  • Classify these as agent-safe observation:
    • list and list --json
    • load of an already installed permitted skill
    • meta
    • exclude list
    • validate and validate --check
    • stale and stale --json
    • install --dry-run
    • install --map --dry-run
    • install --print-prompt
    • scaffold
  • Classify these as human-only trust or delivery mutations:
    • install when it writes intent.skills or guidance
    • install --map when it writes guidance
    • exclude add and exclude remove
    • hooks install
    • setup and setup-github-actions
    • any future skill acquisition or download command, if introduced
  • Classify validate --fix, validate --set-version, and edit-package-json as source mutations governed by the caller's repository-write authority, not by IntentAudience.
  • Classify validate --github-summary and supported CI workflow paths as automation-only, with explicit CI identity and token permissions.
  • Require command implementations to declare their effect and authority class at registration or through one shared command policy.
  • Deny an agent context before a human-only command can prompt, scan for selectors, write package policy, write guidance, install hooks, or install workflows.
  • Preserve explicit automation paths without treating a TTY, an environment variable, or audience as authenticated human authority.
  • Add focused tests for every command class, dry-run exception, mutation denial, automation allowance, and the rule that audience cannot grant authority.

Out of scope

  • Cryptographic proof of human identity.
  • A claim that Intent can contain an actor with unrestricted shell and repository write access.
  • New dependencies or a new skill-content download command.
  • Changes to the current Clack interactive permission setup work.
  • Amendments to #220 or #228.

Acceptance criteria

  • Every registered command action has an explicit effect and authority class.
  • Agent execution can run only classified observation paths and can load only already installed permitted skills.
  • Agent execution fails before any human-only trust or delivery mutation and before its related prompt or write path.
  • IntentAudience, TTY detection, host permissions, and CI identity have separate documented roles.
  • Existing supported automation paths remain usable only through an explicit automation context.
  • Tests cover the command matrix and prove that changing audience or using a pseudo-TTY cannot grant human mutation authority.
  • The documentation states that host permissions remain the security boundary for actors with unrestricted shell and repository write access.

Dependencies

Blocked by: None

#220 and #228 remain independent. This issue must not block or alter the current Clack work.

Lingua principale
TypeScript
Stelle
331
Fork
22
Merge medio
12h 17m
PR unite (30g)
51

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di TanStack/intent

Tutte le issue di TanStack/intent

Issue simili

Altre issue su TypeScript

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.