Muon Optimizer Integration
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Idoneità per principianti
- 8/100
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Ferma
- Ambito
- ai, machine-learning
Direzione di ricerca
This is a staged design plan for adding the Muon optimizer alongside AdamW, with no concrete file or test named in the payload. Start by locating where the optimizer is constructed in the training code, but expect the work to need the maintainers' input on the abstraction and ZeRO interaction before any patch. Done would mean a Muon-vs-AdamW comparison and configurable selection, which is well beyond a first contribution.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
🎯 Goal (What & Why)
Integrate the Muon optimizer into Fast-LLM to improve computational efficiency and downstream model performance.
Muon offers ~2x computational efficiency over AdamW and demonstrated strong performance in math and code benchmarks, see https://github.com/MoonshotAI/Moonlight/blob/master/Moonlight.pdf. The switch aims to reduce training FLOPs while maintaining or enhancing model quality.
The effort to integrate Muon involves significant work. However, the potential gains in computational efficiency and performance may justify this investment. Below is a staged approach from PoC to full integration ensures that we will only execute in full if tangible benefits are demonstrated early.
🚀 Execution Plan
Step 1: Proof of Concept (PoC)
- Approach: Implement the Muon optimizer in a minimalistic and hacky way:
- Use as much code from https://github.com/NVIDIA/Megatron-LM/pull/1428 and https://github.com/KellerJordan/Muon/tree/master as possible.
- Avoid abstracting the optimizer choice initially to speed up validation.
- Hard-code Muon as the sole optimizer in Fast-LLM, removing AdamW temporarily.
- Hard-code optimizer configurations (e.g., learning rate, weight decay) if necessary to speed up iteration.
- Focus on validating Muon's performance on our data and model architectures.
- Validation: Run a controlled experiment comparing Muon to AdamW on existing benchmarks.
- Success Criteria: Demonstrate comparable or superior performance with reduced compute cost.
Step 2: Proper Integration
- Refactoring:
- Introduce an abstraction layer for optimizers in Fast-LLM.
- Make optimizer choice configurable, allowing both Muon and AdamW.
- Implement configuration-driven optimizer selection and setup.
- Testing:
- Ensure that both Muon and AdamW can be used interchangeably.
- Maintain existing test coverage and add new tests for Muon integration.
- Interaction with ZeRO:
- Evaluate the integration with ZeRO, especially for distributed training.
- Implement necessary changes to handle the Muon optimizer in a distributed setup.
- Test for stability and performance in multi-node configurations.
Step 3: Long-Term Optimizations
- Advanced Features:
- Investigate Triton kernel development to optimize Muon further.
- Explore advanced configurations and hyper-parameter tuning for Muon.
- Documentation & Maintenance:
- Write documentation for the new optimizer integration.
- Ensure that future maintainers can understand and extend the integration.
📌 Acceptance Criteria (Must-Haves for Completion)
- The Muon optimizer is functional and tested in both standalone and distributed modes.
- The implementation includes documentation on optimizer selection and configuration.
- The PR includes a performance/impact summary comparing Muon vs. AdamW on relevant benchmarks.
- Refactoring is limited to what is necessary for integrating Muon and allowing optimizer configurability.
🛠️ Project Management
- Assign the project to the Fast-LLM project.
- Set the
Estimatefield (in days) in the GitHub project. - Use the
Sizefield to categorize the PR size (Large). - Assign an owner when opening the issue.
- Lingua principale
- Python
- Stelle
- 337
- Fork
- 52
- Metriche di merge delle PR
- Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g
Preparare l'ambiente
- Include un Dockerfile o un file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di ServiceNow/Fast-LLM
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 25/100
ServiceNow/Fast-LLM#556 ·
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 30/100
ServiceNow/Fast-LLM#538 ·
-
enhancement
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 12/100
ServiceNow/Fast-LLM#533 ·
-
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 15/100
ServiceNow/Fast-LLM#510 · 1 commento ·
-
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 12/100
ServiceNow/Fast-LLM#507 ·
Tutte le issue di ServiceNow/Fast-LLM
Issue simili
-
DBFS append mode silently overwrites existing filesForse già presa @IlyaKhalafi l’ha presa oggi. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 77/100
fsspec/filesystem_spec#2429 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[Bug]: Retrieval rerank fallback statistics stay zero after provider failureForse già presa Una pull request collegata a questa issue è aperta o già unita. Apertabug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
volcengine/OpenViking#7014 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
fedora-copr/copr#4600 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
ansys/pydpf-core#3620 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno